Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
One of the best novels written about British politics, 29 Jul 2001
By A Customer
Roger Quaife, not long Parliament, becomes one of the first of the last intake of Tory MPs to make the cabinet, in his case as Secretary of State for Defence. He seems perfect for the job, being knowledgable, capable, well-liked and well connected. Roger's political life is made difficult by two factors: a long-running affair which and his conversion to the belief that Britain's nuclear deterrent is useless. As the story evolves both his private and political lives become more complicated, with Roger playing for the highest stakes. This is an absorbing novel written by someone who knows government from the inside (Snow was himself a minister in Harold Wilson's government). It's a world away from the high dramas of Jeffrey Archer or Michael Dobbs. Manoevering is subtle, often unintelligible to those outside Whitehall. MPs and civil servants are depicted as real people, with consciences as wel as ambition, personal lives as well as political identities. Even if the scenario of a Tory minister turning against having a nuclear deterrent now seems abusurd (although this may not have been the case when the book was written), this novel remains one of the few convincing portayals of the nitty-gritty of British politics.
|
|
|
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Superb account of post war politics, less compelling as fiction, 31 Mar 2009
"The Corridors of Power" is such as well-worn cliché that it seems surprising that someone once made it up. But it was, and the person who did was CP Snow - as he explains in the introduction - and this book quite exactly lays down the meaning of the concept, with those who are 'in' exerting enormous influence, whether they have been elected to anything or not.
As a picture of how pre-Thatcher government worked, this book is hard to beat. CP Snow knew it from the inside, both as a civil servant and a minister. It rings with the same authenticity as a John LeCarré.
Snow is great at creating engaging characters that we want to care about. But he is not so good at sustaining them. Half way through, I lose my admiration for Roger Quaife: a man who deceives his wife and yet simultaneously wants to lead the nation through high moral principles lacks the inner consistency to be a hero. Of course, many real life politicians have walked down this path, but most of them have also lost our admiration sooner or later.
To me, The Corridors of Power works as a fictionalised manual of politics. Outdated it may be, but plenty of the lessons still apply. Yet, even in that, the book begins to grate. Up to half way, Snow's distribution of the world into men of action and men of reflection, and his sharp observations on love, conscience, and how deals are done, are new and refreshing - at least to me. But after a while, these observations, which repeat, are simply more of the same.
Beginning novelists are often advised to write about what they know. Snow, with eight previous Strangers and Brothers novels under his belt, was no new novelist. But perhaps he would have been better to have written more about what he imagined than about what he knew. As it is, he tries to describe the entire world of Westminster in a single book. This is more entertaining than Politico's Guide to Parliament, and, in its own way, more authoritative. Nonetheless, the book does not sustain as fiction, thereby failing in the most basic attribute of the novel: once we lose admiration for Quaife, knowing what _did_ happen in real life, we lose interest in his story.
Somehow, I feel forced to compare this to CS Lewis's That Hideous Strength and John LeCarré's The Honourable Schoolboy. Both books are closely concerned with detailed political manoeuvrings, but each - at the point that Snow loses my interest - take off into something other: Lewis into high fantasy, and LeCarré into world-trotting espionage.
Three stars, I feel. Snow's writing is beautiful and engaging, but even that, coupled with his masterful use of the political landscape, in insufficient to make this a book you will want to re-read, or possibly even finish.
|
|
|
|