or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
60 used & new from £0.06
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
What is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable
 
 
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book

What is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable (Paperback)

by John Brockman (Editor)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
RRP: £8.99
Price: £5.27 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £3.72 (41%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Want guaranteed delivery by Tuesday, November 24? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
37 new from £1.62 23 used from £0.06
Other Editions: RRP: Our Price: Other Offers:
Hardcover 13 used & new from £0.02

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty by John Brockman

What is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable + What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty
Price For Both: £10.77

Show availability and delivery details

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty

What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty

by John Brockman
4.0 out of 5 stars (8)  £5.50
What are You Optimistic About?

What are You Optimistic About?

by John Brockman
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £6.46
What Have You Changed Your Mind About?: Today's Leading Minds Rethink Everything

What Have You Changed Your Mind About?: Today's Leading Minds Rethink Everything

by John Brockman
£7.44
The Next Fifty Years: Science in the First Half of the Twenty-First Century

The Next Fifty Years: Science in the First Half of the Twenty-First Century

by John Brockman
3.8 out of 5 stars (4)  £8.09
Science at the Edge: Conversations with the Leading Scientific Thinkers of Today

Science at the Edge: Conversations with the Leading Scientific Thinkers of Today

by John Brockman
£10.95
› Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Pocket Books; New edition edition (2 Jul 2007)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 1416526854
  • ISBN-13: 978-1416526858
  • Product Dimensions: 19.3 x 13 x 2.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 231,811 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

Product Description

Product Description

The history of science is replete with ideas that were considered socially, morally or emotionally dangerous in their time. The Copernican and Darwinian revolutions are obvious examples -- radical, brilliant insights that did not so much push the envelope as rip it into shreds. These ideas were dangerous because they challenged our comfort zone. But what are the dangerous ideas of the twenty-first century? Which theories do the world's leading thinkers and scientists regard as too hot to handle -- not because the idea might be false, but because it might turn out to be true? Collecting together the very best contributions to the renowned Edge.org question from the most eminent respondents, WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA? is another endlessly fascinating and provocative insight into the bleeding-edge of intellectual endeavour.


About the Author

John Brockman is a writer, agent and publisher of the 'Third Culture' website www.edge.org, the forum for leading scientists and thinkers to share their research with the general public. He is the author of THE THIRD CULTURE and the editor of several anthologies including WHAT WE BELIEVE BUT CANNOT PROVE and WHAT IS YOUR DANGEROUS IDEA?. He lives in New York.
Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(2)
(1)
(1)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

What is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable
73% buy the item featured on this page:
What is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable 4.0 out of 5 stars (6)
£5.27
What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty
13% buy
What We Believe But Cannot Prove: Today's Leading Thinkers on Science in the Age of Certainty 4.0 out of 5 stars (8)
£5.50
What are You Optimistic About?
6% buy
What are You Optimistic About? 4.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£6.46
Bad Science
4% buy
Bad Science 4.5 out of 5 stars (205)
£3.57
Explore similar items
 

Customer Reviews

6 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting ideas but more detail wanted, 8 Jul 2008
By Adam Graham Malster (Taiwan) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This book is at once very interesting and unrewarding. The idea is that lots of leading scientists have answered the question "What is your dangerous idea". There are 108 contributions from various kinds of scientists and thinkers plus an introduction by Steven Pinker and an afterward by Richard Dawkins (two authors I find to be highly readable). If you've read anything similar edited by John Brockman such as The Next Fifty Years or What we believe but cannot prove then you'll know what to expect.

The book is extremely interesting due to the sheer range of subjects covered. Brockman has also rather cleverly grouped the essays together in themes that flow together and take you through the book. We start off reading about genetics moving to our place in the universe, on then to ecology and the future of the planet to psychology...you get the idea. In fact the range of opinions is quite bewildering and it's tempting to brush over some of the authors' thoughts by reading too many of the essays at one time.

This temptation is in part encouraged by the aspect of the book which makes it a frustrating read. The essays are just far too short. Often you are no sooner intrigued by one of the ideas than you're off onto the next one. It really takes some discipline to try to give each the reflection that it deserves.

And there are some really corking ideas. Some stuff to make you ponder indeed, like Daniel C. Dennett's musings that there aren't enough minds on the planet to house the population of memes. Some of course are just utter tosh such as Roger C. Shank's idea that schools are a useless way to educate children.

All in all a good platform from which to leap into the more detailed ideas of the writers here but rather unsatisfying in itself.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A treasure of ideas from 108 of our most creative minds, 11 May 2008
By Dennis Littrell (SoCal) - See all my reviews
(TOP 50 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
(Plus Richard Dawkins, who writes an Afterword.)

I'll give you some dangerous ideas. Take steps to reduce the human population worldwide to around a billion people and keep it there. Take the biological desire of people to play house and be mothers and fathers, and redirect it into responsible stewardship of the planet.

Don't like that one? Seems too draconian? How about this? End all tax exempt status for churches, mosques, etc. (Resounding voice coming onstage: "Only when they tear my cold, dead fingers from the collection plate!")

Here's another: realize that to know all is to forgive all, and that we are all just biological automations acting out our genetic drives and have no more free will than an ant on the pheromone trail. Deal with people acting in antisocial ways by (1) curing them with psychopharmacology, surgery, retraining, or (2) euthanasia.

Decriminalize street drug use. Allow Phillip Morris to get into the cannabis business and Merck to process opium into heroin. If some people become dysfunctional, see previous dangerous idea and employ it.

Well, none of John Brockman's esteemed contributors came up with anything quite THAT dangerous, probably because the danger of such ideas is most immediately to the person who would advance them! Psychiatrist Randolph M. Nesse gives us some guidance on why such ideas are not being advanced in this book in his modest essay on "Unspeakable Ideas." (pp. 193-195) Here's one: "when your business group is trying to deal with a savvy competitor, say, `It seems to me that their product is superior, because they are smarter than we are.'" Also unspeakable is, "I will only do what benefits me." Nesse writes that saying something like that is akin to committing "social suicide."

David Lykken thinks that parents ought to be required to get licenses to parent and prove they are twenty-one years old, married, and self-supporting. (pp. 175-176)

Jordan Pollack urges us (tongue in cheek, I presume) to embrace "faith-based science." He writes, "physics could sing the psalm that perpetual motion would solve the energy crisis..." with God "on our side to repeal the second law of thermodynamics!" "Astronomy could embrace astrology and do grassroots PR with daily horoscopes to gain mass support for a new space program." (pp. 156-158)

John Allen Paulos joins the Buddha and David Hume and presents the self as "an ever-changing collection of beliefs, perceptions, and attitudes, that is not an essential and persistent entity but a conceptual chimera." (p. 152)

Some of the other "dangerous ideas" concern such things as science versus religion (e.g., Sam Harris's "Science Must Destroy Religion" and Philip W. Anderson's "The Posterior Probability of Any Particular God Is Pretty Small"); exciting speculations (Terrence Sejnowski's "When Will the Internet Become Aware of Itself?"), cosmological conjectures (Brian Greene's "The Multiverse," and Leonard Susskind's "The `Landscape'").

Some of the ideas are not dangerous at all of course, and some are only dangerous to certain segments of society. The idea that the Christian God does not exist is no skin off my teeth and no Buddhist feels threatened by it, but television evangelicals find it downright scary. Judith Rich Harris advances the idea that parents really don't shape their children's morays (their peers and the larger society does). This idea isn't threatening at all unless you are a Pygmalion sort of parent infused with a weighty sense of responsibility, and in that case, her idea can help you to chill out.

Some other ideas may or may not be seen as dangerous. Karl Sabbagh suggests that "The Human Brain Will Never Understand the Universe," and Lawrence M. Krauss wants us to know that "The World May Be Fundamentally Inexplicable." Personally I think they're both right, but that shouldn't keep us from trying to expand the range of our knowledge and understanding. Seth Lloyd even goes so far as to suggest that one of our ideas "is likely to have the unintended consequence of destroying everything we know." He adds that "we cannot stop creating and exploring new ideas. The genie of ingenuity is out of the bottle. To suppress the power of ideas will hasten catastrophe, not avert it." (p. 101)

There are several essays on how drugs might, can, and will affect us (e.g., "Drugs May Change the Patterns of Human Love" by Helen Fisher, and "Using Medications to Change Personality" by Samuel Barondes). There are essays on politics and economics (e.g., Michael Shermer's ode to fiscal conservative and social liberalism, "Where Goods Cross Frontiers, Armies Won't" and Matt Ridley's "Government Is the Problem, Not the Solution"), and on the dangers and promises of futuristic technologies by Ray Kurzweil, Freeman J. Dyson and others. In fact there is so much in this book that a reader could study the ideas for decades--seriously--and hardly scratch the surface of what is implied, hoped for, dreamed of, and feared. It is a great collection of ideas, a masterful work of compilation and editing by science's most talented and creative editor, John Brockman. Don't miss this book. It's even better than Brockman's previous collection "What We Believe But Cannot Prove."

Let me throw in one more dangerous idea not in the book (lest I wax too sanguine): suppose that by bioengineering violent aggression out of the human genome (which seems like a good idea) we end up with something like H.G. Wells' Eloi? Can it be true that humans must be violently aggressive, and if not, will become stagnant and exploitable? One might argue that there would then be no exploiter, but should one appear what would--could--we do?
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
3 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars really good read, 18 Aug 2007
By Joe (United Kingdom) - See all my reviews
ever wanted to eavesdrop on some of the thoughts of the great scientists of today? great for broadening your horizons.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars Dangerous? Not that much
I bought into the promise of the title, and like some of the other reviewers was a bit disappointed. Read more
Published 7 months ago by Avid Reader

5.0 out of 5 stars Challenging assumptions to expand your brain
What is Your Dangerous Idea?

This is a book that has to be read twice to properly appreciate the depth and subtlety of the vast range of bright ideas. Read more
Published 12 months ago by Geoffrey Bond

3.0 out of 5 stars Not quite
I found the book less interesting and 'dangerous' than I thought I would. The ideas are split up into many small chapters, and are linked by similar ideas. Read more
Published 14 months ago by LukeB

Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category

Look for similar items by subject








i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.