or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
37 used & new from £20.59

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience
 
 

Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Paperback)

by M. R. Bennett (Author), P. M. S. Hacker (Author) "Aristotle's conception of the psuche Aristotle is the first great biologist whose treatises and observational data survive ..." (more)
4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
RRP: £26.99
Price: £22.44 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £4.55 (17%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Want guaranteed delivery by Wednesday, November 11? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
31 new from £20.59 6 used from £21.02

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language by M Bennett

Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience + Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language
Price For Both: £31.96

Show availability and shipping details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language

Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language

by M Bennett
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £9.52
The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science

The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science

by Shaun Gallagher
£15.21
Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain

by Antonio Damasio
5.0 out of 5 stars (4)  £6.72
Brain-wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy (Bradford Books)

Brain-wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy (Bradford Books)

by PS Churchland
5.0 out of 5 stars (2)  £22.75
Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World

Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World

by Chris Frith
4.6 out of 5 stars (7)  £13.62
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 480 pages
  • Publisher: WileyBlackwell (25 Mar 2003)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 140510838X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1405108386
  • Product Dimensions: 24.4 x 17.2 x 3.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 76,657 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in these categories:

    #20 in  Books > Scientific, Technical & Medical > Biology > Neuroscience
    #20 in  Books > Science & Nature > Biological Sciences > Human Biology > Neuroscience
    #40 in  Books > Science & Nature > Popular Science > Human Biology > The Brain
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)
   MSc Clinical Neuroscience opens new browser window
www.roehampton.ac.uk  -  Postgraduate course at Roehampton University in south west London. 
   Foundations Philosophy 32 opens new browser window
winbuyer.co.uk  -  Compare & Save on Cosmetics Foundations Philosophy from 32 
  
 

Product Description

Review

“This remarkable book, the product of a collaboration between a philosopher and neuroscientist, shows that the claims made on behalf of cognitive science are ill–founded. The book will certainly arouse opposition... but if it causes controversy, it is controversy that is long overdue.” Sir Anthony Kenny, President of the British Academy, 1989–93 <!––end––>


“This book was simply waiting to be written.” Denis Noble, Oxford University


“Contemporary scientists and philosophers may not like Bennett and Hacker′s conclusions, but they will hardly be able to ignore them. The work is a formidable achievement.” John Cottingham, Professor of Philosophy, Reading University


“Neuroscientists, psychologists and philosophers will be challenged – and educated – by this sustained and well–informed critique.” Paul Harris, Professor, Human Development and Psychology, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University

"This book is a joy to read. It is the fruit of collaboration across disciplines and continents between a neurophysiologist and a philosopher. They have written a polemical work that is a model of clarity and directness. Distiniguished neurophysiologist M.R. Bennett of the University of Sydney, and eminent Oxford philosopher P.M.S. Hacker have produced that rarity of scholarship, a genuinely interdisciplinary work that succeeds. ... This is a wonderful book that will illuminate, provoke and delight professional scientists, philosophers and general readers alike." Australian Book Review

"Bennett and Hacker have identified [conceptual confusions] with clinical precision and relentless good sense.... rich with philosophical insights ... thoughtful and wonderfully useful treatise ..." Philosophy

"careful application in a host of cases ...is precisely what Bennett and Hacker provide in devastating critiques of psychologists and neuroscientists such as Blakemore, Crick, Damasio, Edelman, Gazzaniga, Kandel, Kosslyn, LeDoux, Penrose and Weiskrantz; and they also raise equally disturbing questions for philosophers such as Dennett, the Churchlands, Chalmers, Nagel and Searle. Whether this book leads to a reconfiguring of contemporary neuroscience and the philosophy associated with it will tell us much about the dynamics of contemporary intellectual life." Philosophy

"The vast spectrum of material in philosophy and neuroscience that Bennett and Hacker consider is impressive and their discussion is thorough and illuminating." Human Nature Review


1. ‘[It] will certainly, for a long time to come, be the most important contribution to the mind–body problem which there is.’ G. H. von Wright


2. ‘everyone who thinks about the mind and consciousness should study Philosophical Foundations of Neurtoscience. ... it will ultimately contribute to a far better understanding of mind and consciousness within scientific thought as well as a better understanding of the limits of empirical investigation’, Arthur Collins, The Philosophical Quarterly, 2004


3. ‘Sweeping, argumentative and brilliant, this book will provoke widespread discussion among philosophers and neuroscientists alike’, Dennis Patterson, Notre Dame Philosophical Review, 2003


4. ‘...devastating critiques of psychologists and neuroscientists ... Whether this book leads to a reconfiguring of contemporary neuroscience and the philosophy associated with it will tell us much about the dynamics of contemporary intellectual life’, Anthony O’Hear, Philosophy 2003


5. ‘This book is a joy to read. ... a model of clarity and directedness... [Bennett and Hacker] have produced that rarity of scholarship, a genuinely interdisciplinary work that succeeds. ... This is a wonderful book that will illuminate, provoke and delight professional scientists, philosophers and general readers alike.’, Damian Grace, Australian Book Review, 2003


6. ‘clinical precision and ... relentless good sense ... [a] thoughtful and wonderfully useful treatise’, Daniel N. Robinson, Philosophical Quarterly, 2004


7. ‘mandatory reading for anybody interested in neuroscience and consciousness research. The vast spectrum of material in philosophy and neuroscience that Bennett and Hacker consider is impressive and their discussion is thorough and illuminating.’ Axel Kohler, Human Nature Review, 2003


8. ‘a delicious cake of a book in which Bennett and Hacker guide the reader through a conceptual minefield of confusions repeatedly made by neuroscientists and philosophers alike.’ Constantine Sandis, Metapsychology 2003


9. ‘Anyone who has ever framed a theory or explained one should read this book ‑ at the risk of forever falling silent.’, The Rector, University of Sydney, Obiter Dicta 2003


10. ‘... impressively lucid ... Bennett and Hacker unquestionably succeed in making us challenge our own concepts, examine them for dross, and strive to home in on fundamentals.’ Neil Spurway, Journal of the European Soc for Study of Science and Theology.


11. ‘...the fruit of a unique cooperation between a neuroscientist and a philosopher ... an excellent book that should be read by all philosophers of cognition and all researchers in the cognitive neurosciences.’ Herman Philipse, ABG #2, De Academische Boekengids 2003

12. `...there are, I think, grounds for hope that this book will do an enormous amount of good, both in correcting philosophical confusion within neuroscience and in promoting a new style of dialogue between neuroscience and philosophy′ David Cockburn, Philosophical Investigations, 2005



John Cottingham, Professor of Philosophy, Reading University

The work is a formidable achievement. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
Aristotle's conception of the psuche Aristotle is the first great biologist whose treatises and observational data survive. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

5 Reviews
5 star:
 (4)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.6 out of 5 stars (5 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Contemporary critique of cognitive neuroscience, 6 Jan 2004
By Dr. Matthew Broome "matthewbroome" (London, UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)      
This is an excellent and important read. The authors (a philosopher and a neuroscientist) discuss cognitive neuroscience. The authors commence with a genealogy of our concepts before moving onto conceptual problems in various areas of the neuroscientific study of psychology. Such areas include emotion, consciousness and volition. The work is commendable as it engages both with contemporary neuroscience (LeDoux, Damasio and many others)as well as contemporary philosophers (Dennett, Searle).

This is essential reading for any experimental cognitive neuroscientists as it helps both study design and what research may achieve but also how we should interpret any data thus obtained into a wider psychology. In addition, the book is of interest to clinicians such as neurologists and psychiatrists who perhaps are vulnerable to incorporating the findings of neuroscience uncritically into their own disciplines. Lastly, there is a tendency of scientism in analytic philosophy and an unfortunate conflation of cognitive neuroscience with philosophy of psychology to which this book is a remedy.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
25 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Superb attack on importing Idealism into science, 2 Feb 2005
By William Podmore (London United Kingdom) - See all my reviews
(TOP 100 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
What are you, a ghost in a machine or a living human being? In this excellent book, the authors, a neuroscientist and a philosopher, answer the question.

They say that Rene Descartes' ideas still cause many muddles. He thought that we were all ghosts in machines, two things in one. This was because he believed that there were two basic kinds of thing, mind and matter (a theory called dualism), and that what we are depends on what our minds do (idealism).

The authors show that commonsense clears up the muddles. We are all living human beings. "The person ... is a psychophysical entity, not a duality of two conjoined substances, a mind and a body."

The authors show that dualism - the ghost in the machine - can never explain how our minds relate to our bodies. Our minds are not things, so they cannot cause changes by acting on our brains.

Often neuroscientists wrongly ascribe to our brains the activities that Descartes and his followers like John Locke ascribed to our minds. But human beings - not our brains or minds - think, see, decide and feel. "The brain and its activities make it possible for us - not for it - to perceive and think, to feel emotions, and to form and pursue projects."
Too many neuroscientists trap themselves in idealism. For example, Francis Crick wrote, "What we see appears to be located outside our body. ... What you see is not what is really there. ... In fact we have no direct knowledge of the objects in the world."

But the authors reply, "What we see does not appear to be located outside us. What we see is necessarily located outside our body, unless we are looking at ourselves in a mirror, or at our limbs or thorax." We see what is really there, the real world, and we directly know objects in the world, which exist whether we see them or not.

This is materialism, which "In its simplest and warranted form amounts to a denial that there are mental or spiritual substances." Materialism does not mean that our minds are our brains. It does not mean that we explain things, even material things, by studying the matter of which they are made. Materialism does not reduce everything to physics, or reduce our minds to our nervous systems.

Colin Blakemore was wrong to write, "We are machines", Crick wrong to write, "You ... are in fact no more than the behaviour of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules." Our goals, motives and reasons - not our cells or molecules - explain our behaviour.

The authors show that scientists and philosophers do two different, useful jobs. Scientists analyse what's true and what's false. They create theories to explain and hypotheses to predict.

Philosophers analyse concepts and the rules for the use of words. They clarify what makes sense and what does not. And these authors have done this job superbly.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars did philosophy end in 1953?, 17 Sep 2006
Wittgenstein's book, Philosophical Investigations, is one of the high points of philosophy. I'd recommend it to anyone. If you think that Philosophical Investigations is still the most -almost the only - important book ever published, you will enjoy reading Bennett and Hacker's analysis, and will be inclined to give the work 5 stars, and can stop reading this review now. If you think that the authors deliberately pick the softest available targets in "conceptually confused neuroscience" for their attacks, and are guilty of preaching a "mantra" of "analyse the sentence to display the conceptual confusion, conceptual confusion, conceptual confusion.." then, like me, you'll award the book maybe 3 stars.

The plus point in this book is the obvious erudition of the authors, in particular displayed via a solid analysis of Aristotle's philosophy. It's also fair enough to criticise the Crickian Anti-philosophy-Philosophy in all it's naïve yet misguided splendour.

The main minus point is the unwillingness to deviate a fraction from a "Wittgenstein was right" worldview, this results in repetitive "we will remove the conceptual confusion" statements followed by the mundane explanations of the meanings of words as we normally use them. Also in the irritating category: the almost jealous-sounding criticism of Dennett, for daring to claim that his work has been influenced by Wittgenstein. Whatever you think about Dan Dennett, surely he's allowed to evaluate the influence of others on his own work, even if he doesn't belong to the "Church of Wittgenstein"?

Another significant minus point is the lack of commentary on neuroscience which does not fit the "picture-theory" or "cartesian-mistake" targets, and we can be sure there is such neuroscience. See for example some of the work on neural network representation, or on the vectorial theories of colour space, or even on modern phenomenology. (cf Petitot, Varela, Evan Thompson, Sejnowski & the Churchlands, Noë, O'Regan).

Bennett and Hacker's book isn't rubbish, and is readable. But hopefully readers will be more open-minded to the possibility that some neuroscience isn't just a sub-task for Wittgensteinian analysis, neither is it being carried out solely by naïve scientists with "delusions of philosophical adequacy".
Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent deconstruction of "nothing butery"
This is a fine and detailed book. Takes a lot of reading, and thinking.

It's a necessary book at this time, and it takes on those people who think that thoughts are... Read more
Published 23 months ago by Dr. Nicholas P. G. Davies

5.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant, yet question-begging
Although this is an extremely well put together critique, I can't help the feeling that there is something not quite right about it. Read more
Published on 24 Jan 2005 by dlaver20

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.