|
|
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Superb expose of the EU's dangers, 18 Jul 2001
Adrian Hilton has written this fascinating and deeply researched book from a religious standpoint: it is a kind of liberation theology for Britain. It examines sovereignty, the EU's threat to the Constitution, the divided loyalties caused by dual citizenship, the Pope's political role, EMU's consequences, the EU propaganda offensive and broadcasting bias, and the implications of the European Army.Hilton defends the 1701 Act of Settlement, which completed the 1688 Revolution, whereby the people of England deposed the Catholic King James II. He argues that it is right to bar a Roman Catholic, or a monarch married to a Roman Catholic, from the throne, because Catholicism would oblige such a monarch to subordinate Britain's interests to those of a rival political authority, the Papacy. He compiles the evidence proving that the EU's aim is becoming a single state. In 1960 the Lord Chancellor advised Edward Heath that entering the EEC "is the first step on the road which leads ... to the fully federal state." But Heath told us, "there are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe, we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty. These fears I need hardly say are completely unjustified." Yet when asked later if he wanted "a United States of Europe", he replied, "Of course, yes." Blair told the House of Commons in February 1999, "The euro project is of course an intensely political act. The euro cannot be conceived of except politically." Ken Clarke boasted that he had never read the Maastricht Treaty, but he got its gist: "I look forward to the day when the Westminster Parliament is just a Council Chamber in Europe." In February 2000, Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission, said, "European government is a clear expression I still use. You need time, but step by step the European Commission takes a political decision and behaves like a growing government...
|