|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great book. If you liked the HBR article, you'll love this!, 31 Mar 1999
By A Customer
Frequently organizations face the challange of what not to do. They tend to believe in the person presenting the idea, rather then creating a rigorous process for evaluating the options before them. Companies adopting best practices in managing their investment options realize substantial gains in their long term bottem line. This book quantifies this performance difference, and what the best practices are across a range of industries.Why aren't organizations more rigorous in selecting projects? The book outlines several barriers which are extremely relevent: · It will make a popular champion look bad, · Organizational resistance to change, or cannibalization of an existing business for a new opportunity, · We confuse the urgent with the important, · Its hard to agree on measures and success criteria · People are afraid of making the wrong prediction, so they don't make any, · Its hard to normalize results from different contributors, · Business plans are not integrated with new project activity, · Power and politics, a methodical evaluation leaves no room for interpretation and "behind the scenes" trade offs between groups and individuals, · Lack of strategy. The best practices outlined in this book are backed by substantial research. I would have like to have seen a few additional chapters on application of best practices in real companies ... a case study of a turn around.
|