|
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Waste of a good subject, 19 April 2003
By A Customer
The Coens are among my favourite filmmakers and I was looking forward to learning a lot more about their films. Boy was I disappointed with this feeble book.Bergan makes light of responses from the Coens that they would not be able to spend much time co-operating with him on this project. His jokey manner may have been an attempt at a double-bluff to conceal the fact that he simply didn't have the access required to produce a decent biography. It becomes rapidly evident that the vast majority of the book is culled from previous interviews and secondary sources. The result is patchy and superficial. Ironically, the constantly self-regarding Bergan includes one section about how he was in a private bar with the Coens and that he would have tried harder to interview them if he'd known he was going to write this book. Aside from containing no information of any real interest (it's presumably there to indicate to the reader how important the author is), it also accidentally highlights the complete inadequacy of Bergan's research. Alas, Bergan tries to make up for the lack of material by attempting the occasional analysis of the Coens' films, motivations and influences - a job for which he proves himself woefully inadequate. Most of the time his assertions are risibly contrived. Often, incapable of coming up with any cohesive idea, he resorts to unconvincing and highly tenous comparisons with other movies, seeming to be more interested in showing off his own film knowledge than in casting any light on the Coens' work. One gets the impression that Bergan doesn't actually understand the movies at all. As if this wasn't bad enough, this is all presented with a fifth-form writing style that resorts all too often to peurile puns. Bergan is also fond of throwing in savage adjectives - for example, a director's work is described as *mindless* mainstream movies. While such editorialising might be forgiven if it added depth to what the author was saying, that certainly isn't the case here. More often than not, such dismissive terms are entirely gratuitous, having no relevance to what is being said. One suspects they are in there simply to indicate how brilliant Bergan thinks he is. Indeed, the whole book has a rather patronising tone. What a waste.
|