or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
42 used & new from £2.00

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime?
 
See larger image
 

Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime? (Hardcover)

by A.C. Grayling (Author)
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
RRP: £20.00
Price: £13.00 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £7.00 (35%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Only 4 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want guaranteed delivery by Wednesday, November 11? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
21 new from £2.00 21 used from £2.00

Frequently Bought Together

Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime? + Just War: The Just War Tradition: Ethics in Modern Warfare + The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World
Price For All Three: £26.75

Show availability and shipping details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Just War: The Just War Tradition: Ethics in Modern Warfare

Just War: The Just War Tradition: Ethics in Modern Warfare

by Charles Guthrie
3.8 out of 5 stars (4)  £6.08
The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World

The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World

by Rupert Smith
4.8 out of 5 stars (6)  £7.67
The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World

The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World

by Rupert Smith
Royal Air Force Handbook: The Definitive Guide by the MoD

Royal Air Force Handbook: The Definitive Guide by the MoD

by Great Britain. Ministry of Defence
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £11.49
Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden 1945

Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden 1945

by Paul Addison
£5.60
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC (20 Feb 2006)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0747576718
  • ISBN-13: 978-0747576716
  • Product Dimensions: 23.8 x 16.4 x 4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 69,947 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Product Description

Review

Praise for A.C. Grayling 'Grayling is particularly good at illuminating the knottiness of moral discourse' Sunday Times 'Grayling writes with clarity, elegance and the occasional aphoristic twist, conscious of standing in that long essayistic tradition that runs from Montaigne and Bacon to Emerson and Thoreau' Noel Malcolm, Daily Telegraph


Glasgow Herald

`A challenging, thought-provoking book that forces us to confront
some uncomfortable home truths' --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime?
72% buy the item featured on this page:
Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime? 4.2 out of 5 stars (6)
£13.00
The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World
15% buy
The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World 4.8 out of 5 stars (6)
£7.67
Just War: The Just War Tradition: Ethics in Modern Warfare
8% buy
Just War: The Just War Tradition: Ethics in Modern Warfare 3.8 out of 5 stars (4)
£6.08
The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940-1945
2% buy
The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940-1945 3.8 out of 5 stars (8)
£21.25

 

Customer Reviews

6 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.2 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Allied WWII air warfare reconsidered from post 9-11 point of view, 14 Jul 2007
By Dominic Berlemann "luhdieu72" (Outpost of Progress) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
It's almost impossible to reevaluate the most decisive events of WWII without getting emotionally overexcited in one way or the other. The issues at stake are complex and demand the ability to observe developments from several perspectives simultaneously.

Grayling's book is refreshingly clear and he doesn't resort to the outbursts of rage shown partucularly by people such as German historian Joerg Friedrich. The message is: although the Allied bombing campaigns against the civilian population of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were juridically no war crimes and took place in the wider context of a just war against Hitler's bestial tyranny and Japan's cruel expansionism, they were morally inacceptable since they amounted to sheer instruments of terror with little (if any) real military effect.

Grayling especially condemns Bomber Command's nighttime area bombing of German cities in the final stages of the war when, according to Grayling, the outcome of this uniquely brutal global conflict was no longer in doubt. Yet he also makes crystal-clear that he doesn't want to diminish Allied aircrews' massive and brave contribution to overthrowing fascism. The alternative for Bomber Harris' strategy of bombing entire cities to rubble no matter how many civilian lives would be lost would have been to follow the American example of attacking infrastructure serving a highly military purpose (which the USAAF did in day-time raids predominantly). This approach, Grayling argues, would not only have exerted the same strain on Nazi Germany's Luftwaffe to align many of its resources to defending the Reich as the actual campaign did, but it would have also accelerated the downfall of the military-industrial complex providing the Wehrmacht and Goering's Luftwaffe with the means of waging war. Therefore, the war could have been shortened significantly and many lives on all sides could have been saved - and some rather unique architecture as well.

Grayling's book is an interesting and compelling read, his sense of fairness is almost proverbially English and the central thesis of the book certainly deserves closer inspection, especially in light of the current debate on the war on terror (which itself generates terror amongst ordinary people whose involvement in terrorism is at least uncertain). However, he will certainly not convince all the experts, escpecially the military historians, who tend to reduce historic events just to the actual battle action.
Comment Comments (5) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
15 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars balanced and fair, 12 April 2006
By Barton Keyes "barton keyes" (England) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
By and large this is a balanced and measured account of the cases for and against deciding whether the allied bombing of targets in Germany during the second world war -- under the 'area bombing' policy -- was a legitimate or an illegal act of war. It has very obvious parallels in illuminating the legality or otherwise of recent acts of policy in regard to the Balkans and the Gulf.

From the outset Grayling is at pains in his argument to distinguish between the (unlawful as he regards them) acts of bombing and the courage of the crews of the bombers -- in the Allied campaigns at least. Only at the end of the book does this distinction begin to fray when he states that the Allied airmen should have refused to obey orders to bomb (known) civilian targets and thereby distance themselves from the taint of illegal acts. Here Grayling appears to be indulging in ex post facto rationalisation -- why should have the airmen objected on legal grounds to something that was not then specifically illegal (if of dubious legality)? Only after the Second World War was area bombing specifically made illegal by new codicils to the Geneva Conventions -- until then (largely by manoeuvrings of Britain and the USA admittedly) the situation was murky. The Allies had the moral courage to resolve the ambiguity of the argument in favour of the 'moralist' stance -- even if their nuclear warfare policies did not reflect the apparent resolution.

Grayling's argument effectively reduces to "if area bombing had been specifically illegal then, Britain and the USA would have been guilty of war crimes in pursuing it, as a policy of war -- even against the evil represented by Nazism". On moral grounds as opposed to legal ones his position is indisputably stronger -- as were those of the objectors of the time.

However, after the detailed building of the cases for and against the ending appears slightly rushed and the attempt to link the Allied obliteration of German cities during a war for the saving of civilisation, with the destruction of the Twin Towers is a tendentious piece of argument that does not advance Grayling's case at all.

But these essentially minor points should not detract from the book's overall appeal. Grayling is extremely good on the history and has produced a flowing, lucid narrative that ought to make readers reflect both on what was done then in the eradication of an evil and is still being done in their names -- in pursuit of lesser evils, perhaps?



(One further and minor point of correction: the photograph on the cover of the bookshows B-24 Liberators bombing by daylight and not RAF Lancasters as the photo credit claims)
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
17 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent on ethics but short on history, 22 April 2006
By qpippin (Devon) - See all my reviews
Grayling provides an unanswerable case that area bombing was a moral crime, and he should be read for this alone.
But his account of RAF history is inaccurate, distorted and incomplete.
The tone is set by the cover where B24 Liberators are identified as Lancasters. Grayling claims that deficiencies in its Blenheims, Whitleys, Hampdens, Wellingtons and Battles was the reason for Bomber Command's adoption of night bombing, which ignores the fact that GAF experience was identical. Coventry, Luebeck and Exeter were destroyed by the same means. The GAF had the important tactical role of supporting the Heer while the RAF effectively abandoned the British Army. Modern research shows that 2 TAF was an inaccurate waste of time. Grayling accepts Butcher Harris' claim that bombing saved soldiers' lives but fails to examine the consequences of Bomber Command's squandering half of the entire British war budget. This left nothing with which to equip the British army with a tank immune to the 88-mm dual purpose gun. The result was stalemate in Normandy and the Reichswald with the war extended by at least six months during which the war cemeteries filled up with dead British and Canadian soldiers. There is much more that could be said on the subject of Grayling's acceptance of RAF propaganda expounded by historians such as Richard Overy and John Terraine. But on the ethics of area bombing Grayling is brilliant.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Thought provoking
This book is an essay which sets out to answer the question posed in the subtitle: "Is the targeting of civilians in war ever justified?". Read more
Published 1 month ago by NEP

5.0 out of 5 stars War is HELL & Hindsight Proves Just That Fact...
One needs no further proof that we live in a free and democratic society than the fact that books such as this one are readily available. Read more
Published 14 months ago by GRH "Ex WHA Jet"

2.0 out of 5 stars Not the book it claims to be...
Grayling presents this book as a necessary corrective to apparent moral complacency in Britain and the USA regarding the bombing of Germany during the second world war. Read more
Published on 12 April 2006 by General Reader

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.