These Our Actors (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) (Paperback)

"These Our Actors" is one of those plays where we alternate chapters between the past and the present (and if the two authors each took one time line my guess would be McConnell did the story set in the past concerning Spike and Koogler did the tale set in the present with Willow and her drama class). Although I have to profess that I am getting a bit tired of blasts from the past showing up in seemingly every "BtVS" novel, the parallel story lines work well here for the most part. The story of Spike in the past also deals with what happened right before and after Drusilla turned William the Bloody (Bad Poet) into a vampire, an event that was covered in flashback in the episode "Fool for Love." Of course, this finally gives us an opportunity to get around to the obvious scene that was missing from that episode, namely how Spike got his name, as the new vampire takes his revenge on those who taunted them. Under the story telling principle that it is a small world after all, Cecily, the object of William's affection who taunted and humiliated him, is the daughter of Addams. For me the highpoint of the novel was when Spike--albeit it with help from Drusilla, Angelus and Darla--take his revenge on Addams and his daughter. It is really evil, wicked, bad, mean and nasty. I think I actually shuddered when it became clear what was going to happen.

Overall, "These Our Actors" does a nice job of capturing the character of Spike, especially in the story line dealing with the time he became a vampire. I am not exactly sure when the story takes place in the show's chronology, but apparently it was a time when Buffy was still taking classes or at least considering doing so, but also when Willow is comfortable going public with her relationship with Tara. That suggests early (?) in season 6. This only matters because I think the characterization of Willow skews too much towards the "old" Willow who tended to lack self-confidence as a Wicca. But then I usually find that most writers of these original novels based on the hit TV series created by Joss Whedon are so enraptured with the "original" Willow that they resist recognizing her growth and maturity on the series. Drusilla, Angelus and Darla are more central to the story than Buffy, which is fine for this tale, and I especially like the way Dru is depicted in the novel. There is also a treat for students of drama as memorable lines from great plays are sprinkled throughout the book, testing your knowledge of who said what when (e.g., "Attention must be paid").

Finally, I have to take issue with something that was tossed off in this novel. No, it is not the question of how a vampire survives on an ice flow for a month without the sun getting to them or whether Medea the princess of Colchis was ever properly considered a queen when she lived in Greece with Jason, but rather the extremely disparaging remarks Giles makes about Anoulih's version of "Antigone." I do not think the French dramatist can be faulted for using the ancient Greek myth about the ill-fated daughter of Oedipus as a text from which to construct a morality play that would speak to the situation of France under the German occupation during World War II. But more to the point, Anoulih's modern version has the virtue of making the title character the main character of the play. When I teach my students about the key concepts of a Greek tragedy they read "Antigone" and almost always immediately point out that it is Creon, not Antigone, who is the tragic figure in the play. After all, Antigone is executed for obeying the laws of the god and burying her brother (if a handful of dirt on the face can be called burying), but Creon ends up losing his wife and son because of his actions. There are plenty of plays to ridicule, but Anoulih's "Antigone" is not one of them and Giles should have known better.

While not a great "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" novel, "These Our Actors" is certainly well above average without any major faults that make you want to demand a rewrite. The climax is a pretty good payoff for the set up, which is always a good sign in these books. The parallel stories work pretty well, although that usually means you are more interested in one of the two at any given time. But the Spike in the past story line can stand on its own and for that matter so does the Willow in the present once you know how Adams and Spike know (and hate) each other.

~Amelia~