Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
Thrilling end-of-the-world saga of the phone hordes versus the last few normies!?!, 6 Jun 2006
Ever since George A. Romero set the world alight with `Night of the Living Dead' in 1968, screen writers and novel writers alike, have tried to match the originality and brilliance of that story. Some have come close, but no-one has ever matched it. (Even George A. Romero has tried and despite some excellent attempts, he has failed.) The Cell is Stephen King's attempt and again it fails to hit the mark.
It's a brilliant premise - something as ubiquitous as a cell phone, being used by an unknown enemy, to turn the population into frenzied, inane, killers. Think about it - everyone has a cell phone, from your eleven year old cousin to your eighty year old grandmother - they are everywhere! So, if they were ever were to turn against us, we would be in trouble!
Unfortunately, the brilliance ends with the initial premise and does not radiate throughout the book. King's ideas are original; all the usual zombie clichés are missing, there are no gung-ho ex marines ready to kill anything that moves and in King's book when you die, you die, you are not resurrected as a flesh eating, groaning, monster. Even though this is true, I kinda miss these old unoriginal cliché's!
'The Cell', unfortunately, never seems to warm up, firstly, it jumps straight into it. The first zombie appears on the fourth page, giving the reader no time to get to know the characters. (Surely, we have to learn a bit about the characters in order to decide if we want them to get killed in grotesquely horrible ways, or we want them to survive to the end?) But Clayton is the only character we are introduced to before the book launches into the action and we only get to know him in the books dangerous and stressful situation. (I realise that books these days have to capture the reader from the first page, but King, is such a popular writer that surely he can afford to spend a few pages letting us get to know his characters.)
King does have interesting ideas, the zombies or the `phone hordes' are all guided by some higher intelligence and communicate telepathically or through dreams, they are not the brainless, flesh-eating zombies we have come to expect from this genre, but like the premise, he never seems to capitalise on these good ideas. The book is definitely worth a read, if you are a massive King fan you will probably love it and any book that contains the line "Homeland Security's been cancelled due to a lack of sanity" has got to be worth consideration. However, this reader prefers, some of Stephen King's other work, like Shawshank or the Shining, both of these are as near perfection as a novel can be!!!
I have no doubt Stephen King will return to form and impress us all again! After all, he is the brain behind such classics as Carrie and The Stand. So I am disappointed for the moment, but I am eagerly awaiting his next book, hoping it will match the novels previously mentioned.
|
|
|
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
Cell, 31 Mar 2007
I have to start by saying I tend to feel this is a return to form for King. If you look at this against his complete body of work, it isn't the greatest, but taken in it's own right (which we should really do) this is a good story that should keep you hooked and turning those pages. I find it frustrating he uses the same metaphors from book to book (who recognises the 'nerves like over tightened guitar strings' phrase yet again?) but I guess after 40 books I can forgive him. I found the story to be downright chilling in places and reminiscent of 'The Stand' (still his greatest ever book!) due to it's end of the world survival themes. The idea is original and this book has a good ending which leaves you feeling satisfied. It's also good to see an old-fashioned Zombie story again. Compared to the lack lustre affairs of his last few books, this is great horror reading and King doing what he does best.
|
|
|
37 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
Stephen King is back, 3 Feb 2006
Stephen King is back and I, for one, am glad King is still writing--even if I was nervous about picking up my cell phone for a couple of days!
The editorial reviews tell you everything you need to know about the plot, so I won't repeat it here.
When I read this book I saw comparisons to two novels; one of those books is Dean Koontz's "The Taking." Although the plots are superficially the same--a trip through a nightmare world--the books are very different in style, in tone, and in the "whys" underlying them. [Depending on your point of view, by the way, you'll find King's explanation either inspired or exasperating.]
The comparisons to the zombies movies are fairly obvious, but the descriptions of human life after the Pulse, for Clay and his band of struggling "normies," and of non-human life.
And that plausibility carries through to the ending. It's difficult to write an ending for a book like this one, but King managed to write one that makes sense without false optimism (as the book's prologue notes, most of America is dead by the time the book ends) *or* unnecessary pathos.
All in all, King fans will be thrilled by this book; and if this is your first King Novel it will leave you drooling for King's next novel.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
(84)
£4.07
(4)
£4.03
(36)
£4.99
(11)
£3.47
See all Product Description
(169 customer reviews)
