kognosko
Price: £32.77
In stock

10 used & new from £3.31

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
How We Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science
 
 

How We Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science (Hardcover)

by Michael Shermer (Author) "In my senior year of high school I accepted Jesus as my savior and became a born-again Christian ..." (more)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


3 new from £32.77 7 used from £3.31

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)
   Searching for God opens new browser window
www.themissinginnocence.com  -  Understanding who you are, where you are from & where you are going 
   Thoughts about God opens new browser window
www.thoughts-about-god.com  -  Christian meditations, reflections, devotions, stories and more. 
   Prove God Exists opens new browser window
CosmicFingerprints.com  -  Systematic Proof of Intelligence And a New Theory of Evolution 
  
 

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

The Science of Good and Evil: Why People Cheat, Gossip, Care, Share, and Follow the Golden Rule

The Science of Good and Evil: Why People Cheat, Gossip, Care, Share, and Follow the Golden Rule

by Michael Shermer
£9.81
Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time

Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time

by Michael Shermer
3.5 out of 5 stars (22)  £8.58
The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason

The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason

by Sam Harris
3.5 out of 5 stars (69)  £4.99
The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense

by Michael Shermer
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £16.15
Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism

Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism

by David Mills
4.4 out of 5 stars (9)  £6.99
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 302 pages
  • Publisher: W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd (13 Jan 2000)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 071673561X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0716735618
  • Product Dimensions: 23.6 x 16.3 x 2.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 821,032 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Product Description

This text explores what drives us to believe, to have faith, and to create and flock to religions the world over. Throughout, Michael Shermer is interested in the how and why rather than the right or wrong, proving or disproving. This analysis is designed for anyone, whether devout believer or devoted agnostic, spiritual searcher or armchair anthropologist.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
In my senior year of high school I accepted Jesus as my savior and became a born-again Christian. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
science
religion
philosophy
michael shermer
atheist
the religion meme
skeptic

Your tags: Add your first tag
 


 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Explaining the We'uns, 25 Jun 2007
By Stephen A. Haines (Ottawa, Ontario Canada) - See all my reviews
(TOP 10 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
When hosting the announcement of the draft map of the human genome, US President Bill Clinton casually discarded over 500 years of human endeavour. Ignoring the fact that since Copernicus the role of divinities in the life has become irrelevant, Clinton dragged a god into the ceremony. The past half millenia has revealed a wealth of information from galactic spectra to the operating details of life itself. But the work was done by people, not some ghost. Mark Twain railed at `god coming in to claim the credit' after human effort produced cures for yellow fever and other ills. Clinton must have made the spirit of Twain gyrate furiously when he credited [g]od with creation, and by default, the cause of the structure of DNA. With so much knowledge of a god's irrelevance confronting him, why did Clinton fall into the trap of giving credit to the supernatural?

Michael Shermer has made a significant effort to detail the background thinking [or lack of it] that sustains the concept of The Desert Deity so firmly in the American psyche. How does the idea of a divine creator persist when the logic supporting it weakens with every forward stride of knowledge? Why do so many Americans, supposedly the most literate nation on earth, retain such adherence to superstition? Who are the believers and why do they believe?

Half a century ago, Robert Nathan wrote a delightful social satire, DIGGING THE WEANS. Archeologists from a future Africa crossed the seas to learn about the extinct people known as the US. In particular, they sought answers to why the US seemed so different from other people. One wonders what Nathan might think today. Since his time `globalization' has become a smokescreen term for Americanization. How these new imperialists think is a compelling issue. Shermer's book has provided insight to one facet of that thinking. It's of particular meaning to those of us living elsewhere. If there's a serious flaw in this book, it's a failure to make some valid comparisons with other people and their faiths.

Still, Shermer tries valiantly to fulfill the mandate he's given himself. How Americans believe is depicted by numerous quantitative studies. How many PhDs, bank managers or trash collectors, burdened with fears of the afterlife [or lack thereof] cling to the image of The Sprite? Shermer can't truly extract which of these is hopeful of something better on The Other Side, or simply fleeing an envisioned post-perish punishment. We can't blame him for this, since the faithful probably can't say, either.

Shermer's attempts to provide insight into WHY so many Americans are so persistent in their piety fall rather flat. The studies quoted seemed rather simplistic, but the question can only be, do you believe in The Sprite, or not. The discussions about agnosticism, non-theist or theist are engaging, but don't address the difficult question: why does the nation with the most Nobel winners remain the most superstitious? Perhaps Shermer would have done better to simply beg off attempting the question as too difficult. At least in only 290 pages. Yet, the question arises repeatedly. It titles the fourth chapter and an appendix and is the theme of Chapter 5. He uses it as a subtopic and for table headings, but we never find out why such a powerful people need to escape reality for the elusive solace of neo-Christianity.

The cure for yellow fever [and smallpox and polio] came from science workers, not faith[ful] healers. Twain wanted priority recognition for those researchers and instead watched the credit go to a god. With such a high proportion of Americans expressing faith, it's inevitable that even scientists will find themselves in different camps. In one of the strangest sections in this book, Shermer launches an assault on Daniel C. Dennett's critique of Steven J. Gould. Gould, co-author of the `punctuated equilibria' mechanism of evolution, is particularly deft at mental gymnastics in proffering his ideas. In this context, he sells Shermer on eschewing the term `random' in favour of `contingency' in describing evolution's process. Dennett, following Richard Dawkins, rightly sees Gould introducing `skyhooks' in his attempts to modify Darwin's natural selection. Shermer is clearly unhappy at this tarnishing of his hero, firmly chastising Dennett for `protesting overmuch'.

Why does Shermer take off on Dennett so strongly? Is it merely because Gould forwarded his last book? Shermer awards Gould too much credit for giving `contingency' a deep philosophical meaning in contrast to `random', a quirky and apparently less definable term. Gould rises in his own defence of contingency, wrapping the evidence in the term `sequence' in his definition of evolution's modus operandi. This seems to give `contingency' a respectability lacking in `random'. The presentation is convoluted and the evidence misleading, however. Random necessarily avoids sequence; otherwise it's no longer random. Nor is contingency sequential - unless, as in this case, evolution makes it so. As for Dennett `doth protest overmuch', Shermer ignores the stature of Gould as America's best-known science writer. If Gould gets it wrong, the impact will be widespread. And he got it wrong. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.