Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
50 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Choose your translation with care, 18 Jan 2005
By A Customer
Notes from Underground is a brilliant, flowing, idiosyncratic novel. It is partly an impassioned rant against certain groups in Russian society, partly a moving tragedy set in the 1840s. The underground man, who throughout speaks directly to the reader, is an ordinary man who is an extraordinary literary creation. Dostoevsky's ability to subtly craft complete, complex and stunningly real characters is a mark of all his novels, and it is demonstrated superbly in Notes from Underground. It is only "Notes" (it runs to only 130 pages), and it is very short on Dostoevsky's skilfully crafted dialogue, but nonetheless this novel makes an excellent introduction to Dostoevsky. You may have noticed that there are different editions of this book. Prices range from 79p to £8. You're probably thinking "why on Earth should I buy the £8 copy?" The reason is that Pevear and Volokhonsky's translation is the only translation that counts. They are the only translators who succeed in making Dostoevsky accessible to a 21st century audience, thanks to their ruthless attention to detail at the expense of alterations which can dilute Dostoevsky's unique and flowing style of writing. No 19th century author I have ever come across writes more intelligently or conveys ideas more clearly. The great appeal this book retains even today is in part due to Pevear and Volokhonsky, as well as to Dostoevsky himself. Furthermore, Richard Pevear's substantial introduction is essential reading. It explains the purpose of the book and the historical significance of its ideas. Dostoevsky was writing at a time when Russia had reason to be optimistic, but the warning signs in his fiction perhaps leave us clues as to why Russia still has social problems today - and why, less than 40 years after Dostoevsky's death, Russia embraced Communism and destroyed the society in which Dostoevsky had lived.
|
|
|
22 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
"Which is better - cheap happiness or exalted suffering?", 14 Mar 2006
‘Notes From The Underground’ is a formidable work of philosophy and of psychology, not to mention its worth as a novel. In the space of around one hundred pages, Dostoyevsky manages to expound theories on reason, alienation, suffering, and human inaction. The book’s importance and influence on generations of writers cannot be over-emphasised; Sartre and Camus are only two examples of people who have been directly influenced by this book.The book is presented in two parts. Part one ‘Underground’ is written in the form of the nameless narrator’s rambling thoughts on reason and his claim that throughout history, human actions have been anything but influenced by reason. Underground Man’s charge is that man values most the freedom to choose to act in opposition to reason’s dictates. Dostoyevsky’s critique of reason then, although it demands attention and is somewhat difficult to follow, sets the philosophical foundations for the rest of the book. Part two ‘A Propos of the Wet Snow’ is much easier to read, as the narrator recounts three episodes which happened when he was fifteen years younger and working as a civil servant in St. Petersburg. The first considers an incident in which an army officer insults him and goes on to detail Underground Man’s subsequent internal anguish at his inability to commit an act of retribution. The second episode takes place at a farewell dinner for an acquaintance named Zverkov. The narrator is utterly disgusted with the company in which he finds himself but despite this, he is unable – even though he desires it - to make them realise this. The third episode details Underground Man’s brief, painful and emotional relationship with a prostitute. Dostoyevsky is refreshing in this book thanks not only to his incredibly powerful prose, but also for the intense but subtle way in which the stories reflect and indeed embody his philosophical theories. This dark and pessimistic portrayal of the nature of man may not sit very comfortably with many readers, however the ideas expressed in ‘Notes From The Underground’ are as relevant and worthy of deliberation now as I am sure they were in 1864.
|
|
|
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A sneak preview of what was to come, 7 Feb 2004
I am a big fan of Dostoyevsky, especially 'Crime and Punishment' and 'The Brothers Karamazov'. This book was one of the first he wrote after his release from prison and it lays out the philosophical position that was to underpin those later books. His whole later career was concerned with the question of morality, of whether it was possible, or desirable, to develop a moral code that differs from that of the surrounding society, particularly when you believe that you are somehow superior to that society. 'Notes...' is split into two parts. The first is a series of short essays written by a profoundly alienated individual in which he discusses his relationship with and views on the people who surround him, and about his difficulty in empathising with or being understood by them. This section really sets out the ideas that were to guide the rest of his career. Unfortunately, I feel that Dostoyevsky is at his best when weaving those ideas into a narrative, and the very explicit way he sets them down here isn't, I think, where his strengths lie. Despite this section being relatively short, I struggled to get into it, and found it fairly turgid to wade through. The second section is a short story which illustrates his skill as an author much better. It describes a meeting with some people from his past (whom he despises and who despise him), and his inability to 'play the game' with them, to pretend that he cares about the (trivial) concerns they have. It also concerns his relationship with a prostitute who he both feels pity for and is pitied by, but who he cannot help but despise. This is much more in keeping with the style which captivated me in the other books of his I have read, and contains many of the scenarios and motifs that appear in them. It is undoubtedly well written, but still doesn't have the impact of 'Crime and Punishment', and I would suggest that anyone wanting to read Dostoyevsky tries that first. Perhaps three stars is a little harsh, because I am comparing it to some of my favourite books written by the same author. It is perhaps important to read this to understand how his thoughts grew after his release from prison, but all in all it goes to the bottom of my pile as far as Dostoyevsky is concerned. It is only a very short book, so can be read fairly quickly by anyone wanting to give it a go, but I would recommend reading other of his books first.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|