Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
The Uses of Argument
 
 
Share your own customer images
Search inside another edition of this book

The Uses of Argument (Paperback)

by Stephen Edelston Toulmin (Author) "A man who makes an assertion puts forward a claim-a claim on our attention and to our belief ..." (more)
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


6 used from £7.00
Other Editions: RRP: Our Price: Other Offers:
Hardcover (2) £53.00 £50.35 10 used & new from £44.90
Paperback (Updated edition) £16.99 £13.24 38 used & new from £10.88
Unknown Binding Order it used

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Critical Reasoning and Argumentation)

Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Critical Reasoning and Argumentation)

by Douglas Walton
£16.19
Return to Reason

Return to Reason

by Stephen Edelston Toulmin
£15.15
Rulebook for Arguments

Rulebook for Arguments

by Anthony Weston
4.8 out of 5 stars (6)  £4.25
Research Design in Social Research

Research Design in Social Research

by Professor David de Vaus
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £18.59
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach

by Frans H. van Eemeren
£17.09
› Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press (1 Jan 1958)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0521092302
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521092302
  • Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.2 x 1.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 494,889 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Review

‘An interesting and provocative discussion of the philosophical issues about the nature of logic.’ Nature

‘A book designed to awaken philosophers out of a nightmare - the nightmare brought on by an over-rich banquet upon logico-mathematical ideals.’ The Humanist


Product Description

Traditionally, logic has been claimed to be ‘the science of rational argument’, but the relevance to our everyday disputes of the formal logician’s results has remained unclear. The abstract character of traditional logic cuts the subject off from practical considerations; Mr Toulmin enquires why this is so, and shows how an alternative conception can be of more general value. Starting from an examination of the actual procedures in different fields of argument - the practice, as opposed to the theory, of logic - he discloses a richer variety than is allowed for by any available system. He argues that jurisprudence rather than mathematics should be the logician’s model in analysing rational procedures, and that logic should be a comparative and not a purely formal study. These suggestions lead to conclusions which many will consider controversial; though they will also be widely recognized as interesting and illuminating. This book extends into general philosophy lines of enquiry already sketched by Mr Toulmin in his earlier books on ethics and the philosophy of science. The ordinary reader will find in it the same clarity and intelligibility; and the professional philosopher will acknowledge the same power to break new ground (and circumvent old difficulties) by posing fresh and stimulating questions.
Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
A man who makes an assertion puts forward a claim-a claim on our attention and to our belief. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
practical reasoning
stephen e toulmin
quality arguments
logic
grey fox
great used copy
applied reasoning

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

The Uses of Argument
85% buy the item featured on this page:
The Uses of Argument 5.0 out of 5 stars (1)
The New Rhetoric: Treatise on Argumentation
4% buy
The New Rhetoric: Treatise on Argumentation
£22.75
Rulebook for Arguments
4% buy
Rulebook for Arguments 4.8 out of 5 stars (6)
£4.25
Argumentation Schemes
3% buy
Argumentation Schemes
£18.04
Explore similar items
 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
5.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A very insightful read, 17 Jul 2007
By C. Bergenholtz (Aarhus, Denmark) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Uses of Argument (Paperback)
This is a fantastic book. I am a philosophy graduate and ph.d. student - to my knowledge this is the best book on arguing and reasoning ever written. The book is thus worth reading for several purposes; if you just want to be better at understanding and providing arguments in life in general, or if you are a student and want to write better essays and papers. It provides practical examples, and a model for understanding arguments. The model is simple and straightforward, simply because it accurately describes what a good argument is in the western world.

Toulmin critizes the analytical tradition. As Toulmin says, there are very few genuinely pure analytical arguments in real life; it is much more messy. The analytical standard (pure logic) is thus often meaningless. An analytical based doubt does not necessarily make sense. As Aristotle once wrote (could have been Toulmins words):

...it is a mark of the trained mind never to expect more precision in the treatment of any subject than the nature of that subject permits; for demanding logical demonstrations from a teacher of rhetoric is clearly about as reasonable as accepting mere plausibility from a mathematician...

The basic relevant terms (when it comes to arguments and reasoning), according to Toulmin are: Claims, qualifiers, warrants, backing and rebuttal. You make CLAIMS based on DATA that involve some kind of QUALIFER (always, sometimes, hardly etc.), but in order to be credible you have to be able to provide WARRANTS for your claim. And you might have to provide BACKING for your warrant. For instance: Peter is born on the Faroe Islands (data). Since a person born there is usually is a danish citizen given the danish laws (warrant), then, presumably (qualifier), unless his parents are foreigners or Peter has changed citizenship (rebuttals), Peter will be a danish citizen (claim / conclusion). Thus, the claim can be questioned both by questioning the data or the warrant.

Another interesting example relates to the term "can not". Toulmin shows that it can mean so many different things: a) You can not lift this object, it is too heavy. b) You can not talk about a fox's tail, it is a linguistic error. c) You can not refer to a male sister, it does not make sense. d) You can not smoke in here, it is forbidden. e) You can not just turn your back on your son, it is morally wrong. f) You can not calculate the exact square root of 2, it is mathematically impossible. g) You can not ask for the weight of fire, it is a conceptual contradiction. The "can nots" refer to many different things. For instance, you actually could smoke where it is forbidden, while you never could provide the square root of two. The criteria are thus very different, from context to context.

I could provie quite a few further interesting analysis and examples fromt he book. My claim would be that a regular student could improve him/herself one grade by reading and understanding this book.

PS: Toulmin thus explains the following problem, that is stated in Lewis Caroll's "What the Tortoise said to Achilles":

The Tortoise says:
(A) Things that are equal to the same are equal to each other.
(B) The two sides of this triangle are things that are equal to the same.
(C) If A and B are true, Z must be true.
(Z) The two sides of this Triangle are equal to each other.
"You should call it D, not Z," said Achilles. "It comes next to the other three. If you accept A and B and C, you must accept Z."
"And why must I?"
"Because it follows logically from them. If A and B and C are true, Z must be true. You don't dispute that, I imagine?"
"If A and B and C are true, Z must be true," the Tortoise thoughtfully repeated. "That's another hypothetical, isn't it? And, if I failed to see its truth, I might accept A and B and C, and still not accept Z, mightn't I?
"You might," the candid hero admitted...(1895)
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category

Look for similar items by subject










i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.