|
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Extraordinary vision and a disturbing analysis, 18 April 2005
First published in 1959, "Starship Troopers" is a fine example of the writing of Robert Heinlein, and one of the classics of science fiction despite its being written at the cusp of the author's political change.Heinlein's creative vision is extraordinary - his apparent ability to become an observer of a real world, not a fictional one, his use of detail and skill at building a setting make him a first class exponent of the genre. Heinlein's vision of future war, and in particular of the frontline superman soldier, has been a major influence on militaristic SF ever since, and has impacted on the model soldier and wargaming world, and perhaps even on the thinking of the US military as well. He offers a graphic description of military training and fighting, a future war in which the human soldier becomes one with a powerful armoured suit ... a knight of the future, a knight no longer operating independently but as part of a trained, disciplined force, with a rigid command structure and loyalty to a cause. History and moral philosophy are taught by army veterans. Only soldiers have the right to vote, only those who are prepared to die for their society achieve full citizenship. Heinlein writes with compassion and tolerance, and he takes risks - you discover things about the hero at the end which surprise you ... and challenge the picture you painted of him throughout the novel. But "Starship Troopers" is one of the first pieces of evidence of Heinlein's drift into right-wing ranting and political extremism. This is a unified world, a disciplined world ... modelled on the USA. It is a world of the superman. Heinlein had a seminal influence on SF - he created, deconstructed, then recreated some of the major themes in science fiction writing, and has an astonishing ability to build fantastic worlds and breathe life into them. But in "Starship Troopers" we have a flirtation with the centralisation of the Fascist State - the adolescent is saved from teenage irresponsibility by becoming a man, brainwashed into the automaton status of a robotic fighting machine. The suit of armour is vital to the trooper's military effectiveness - man becomes machine, machine man. Morality and philosophy (and hence politics) take on a deterministic dynamic - reason and logic can be followed with robotic precision, decisions made about society are logical rather than emotional. The values of society are obvious, they are taught, and right-thinking people, the sort who elect to become soldiers, cannot help but recognise their validity. The soldier is the moral basis of society - prepared to sacrifice his life to uphold its values and protect the human race. The sacrifice of the soldiers is on a par with the sacrifice of soldier ants and the bugs the hero is fighting. Throughout, there is this ironic comparison of blind obedience and blind reason with the hive-like mentality of the alien creatures. Heinlein gives us the universal society and the globalisation of mind. His soldiers obey because obedience is just, logical, and reasoned. It's a disturbing vision. On the surface, we have a gung-ho military romp - and credit Heinlein with devoting so much time to describing the training and indoctrination of the recruit (a theme which has been oft repeated since then in novels and the cinema), rather than just leaping in to the 'glamour' and 'excitement' of combat. But it's also a novel whose undercurrents explore the nature of the relationship between man and machine - and the potential implications for man in the dependency on a technology which can reshape philosophy as well as warfare. This is a superbly crafted novel, well-paced, engaging, as entertaining as it is disturbing. It is a must-read for anyone interested in science fiction, regardless of political outlook. Posing as a shoot-'em-up entertainment for teenagers, it has an intellectual depth and quality which should leave you asking questions ... important questions ... about the world in which we live.
|