17 used & new from £5.00

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations: A Story of Economic Discovery
 
 

Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations: A Story of Economic Discovery (Hardcover)

by D Warsh (Author)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


5 new from £18.53 12 used from £5.00

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics

The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics

by Eric Beinhocker
4.3 out of 5 stars (9)  £7.66
This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly

This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly

by Carmen M. Reinhart
5.0 out of 5 stars (4)  £13.16
The (Mis)Behaviour of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin and Reward

The (Mis)Behaviour of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin and Reward

by Benoit B. Mandelbrot
3.9 out of 5 stars (14)  £5.95
The Road to Serfdom (Routledge Classics)

The Road to Serfdom (Routledge Classics)

by F.A. Hayek
4.3 out of 5 stars (36)  £9.56
Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism

Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism

by George A. Akerlof
4.1 out of 5 stars (14)  £9.41
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 320 pages
  • Publisher: W. W. Norton & Co.; illustrated edition edition (16 Jun 2006)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0393059960
  • ISBN-13: 978-0393059960
  • Product Dimensions: 23.6 x 16.8 x 3.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 511,711 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Product Description

Product Description

"Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations" is a stimulating and inviting tour of modern economics centred on the story of one of its most important breakthroughs. In 1980, graduate student Paul Romer tackled one of the oldest puzzles in economics. Eight years later, he solved it. This book tells the story of what has come to be called the new growth theory: the paradox identified by Adam Smith, its disappearance and occasional resurfacing in the nineteenth century, the development of new technical tools in the twentieth century, and finally the student who could see further than his teachers. New growth theory helps to explain dominant first-mover firms like IBM or Microsoft, underscores the value of intellectual property and provides essential advice to those concerned with the expansion of the economy. This revealing book takes us to the front lines of scientific research, giving us a fascinating glimpse of the essential science of economics.

About the Author

Former Boston Globe columnist DAVID WARSH writes the online newsletter Economic Principals and is presently a fellow of the American Academy in Berlin.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
economics
innovation
economic history
knowledge
worldview
looks interesting
intellectualcap ital
globalization
education

Your tags: Add your first tag
 


 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent coverage, a bit more depth and better language would make it a book to keep coming back to, 1 Nov 2006
As someone with only a basic background in Micro- and Macro- Economics (towards which I had a rather cavalier attitude during b-school), I found this history extremely illuminating. The author tracks the central ideas in economics through Adam Smith to 2006 - telling the history of how Economics has historically treated the puzzle of growth (i.e., increasing returns) through technological change. Along the way, you get to meet a whole host of brilliant economists and come to appreciate the nuances of what gets them excited.
I also began to appreciate that the common refrain against serious economic discussion "...but it is just common sense" not only indicates our deep ignorance about the topic, but that it is only by understanding (and, further, learning to measure) the economic changes that one can begin hope to benefit from it. For example, it is intuitively well understood that technological innovation makes for good economics - but it seems a terribly difficult question to answer "how and how much?"! If governments and businesses knew "how and how much" on more economic concepts, we'd be rid of a lot of random policies based on seemingly sound common sense but bad economics.
The reasons this doesn't get 5 stars are:
(a) typos abound in the book - surprising from someone who has written 3 books and perhaps many columns (the author doesn't furnish his educational background though!)
(b) Hilarious 'Americanisms' through the book. Sample: "visit with" (which seems to be the preserve of public speakers in the US) and "Many various things..." (!!!). I wish a serious book hoping to go down as a definitive history on growth economics used better language - this is like elegant suits with cheap lining which don't last.
(c) In an effort to simplify and entertain, the thread of actual economics keeps being lost or muddeled while you read about the various characters and digressions. The style is great to give you a good feel of what it means to do Economics, but the actual content needs deeper treatment. For example, the chapter about Romer's paper actually talks more about other people and topics than the key topic this book is about! I understand this is a fine line to tread for an author, but I'd learn from Simon Singh (Fermat's last theorem, Code book), Gary Zukav (Dancing Wu-Li Masters), or Richard Rhodes (Making of the atomic bomb) and make the assumption that someone who buys a book about economic theory would be looking for a serious treatment of the content. This book won't be read by your typical business traveller or the Oprah's book club, so the trap of mass appeal is just not worth it.
Having said this, this book is still a great exposition of economic history - had I read it before my b-school courses, perhaps I'd have had the sense to learn (and get better grades too) and appreciate that Economics is closer to our lives than we think. For those with no background in economics and just a passing interest (but not enough to learn the concepts), this is still an interesting and very contemporary introduction.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Economic History for the Gossip Column, 30 April 2007
By Steve Keen "therealus" (Herts, UK) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)   
David Warsh's book about how Paul Romer cracked the question of the economics of knowledge came highly recommended. As a knowledge worker with an appreciation of books that explain, and help me explain, the world, it seemed like a book I needed to read.

Though I don't have any formal economics qualification I learned just enough when at college to be able to teach the basics, and covered Economics in my MBA. I've read plenty of the primary texts - Smith, Marx, Schumpeter, Keynes, Hayek, Coase - plenty of "pop" economics - Galbraith, Kay, Krugman, Seabright - and a few textbooks - I was in the middle of Samuelson and Nordhaus's when I ordered this book.

What I was expecting was probably somewhere between David Landes's The Wealth And Poverty Of Nations, another book with a clear Adam Smith allusion, and Why Globalisation Works by Martin Wolf, a journalist as is David Warsh, but though Warsh's book has its merits it measures up to neither of these works.

The author commences more or less with an overview of the politics of the closed world of economics academe. It proceeds with a chatty, sometimes quite interesting but ultimately overlong History of Economics, given the book's central purpose. JK Galbraith's book of that name is more comprehensive and more entertaining for the author's undisguised viewpoints and prejudices. Although Warsh uses this section for context it is overdone, and ends up as a very long aside.

There are some diverting biographical notes for the uninitiated on Smith, Ricardo, Marx, Mill, Marshall and Keynes amongst the more well-known economists. Some less well-known characters from Economics are also profiled, together with the origins of some key economic concepts such as The Invisible Hand, Comparative Advantage, Supply and Demand, and Externalities. There are also some interesting historical perspectives, such as the founding of the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts and, shortly after, of Harvard University, and tales such as Harvard's (lost) battle with MIT to recruit Kenneth Arrow. Equally interesting are some of his excursions into analogy and illustration, such as William Henry's bloodflow model, the invention of the bra, and why Brits are called limeys.

But much of the background information is so tangential and lengthy that you have to keep reminding yourself what the book is supposed to be about. While Romer's domestic arrangements will doubtless be fascinating in his biography, here they are a distraction here. And the news that James Buchanan's "career makes an interesting story" evoked a sigh of long-suffering as I anticipated yet another excursion away from the point. I don't need to know if these guys take milk in their coffee!

It's not until about page 150 that the book really gets to the point. I was hoping this would be a pivotal moment, and that from here on we'd stop wandering off, but that doesn't happen.

Warsh is also sometimes a little off-beam in his thinking. He suggests, for example that Game Theory should be known as Strategic Thought. Actually, Game Theory is a part of Strategic Thought. Avinash Dixit (who gets a number of namechecks) and Susan Skeath refer to Games Of Strategy in the title of their excellent book on the subject, but still talk about Game Theory.

Also irritating is the poor proofreading, as evidenced by all sorts of typos like "he didn't try explain it" (p66), " a man who had receive every honour" (p124), "Nowegian" (p127) and the almost-sentence "The trip to the store one had to make in order to buy a candy bar as an armful of groceries" (p114). Eh? And what exactly does "thereafter everything would be jake" mean (p64)? Even "Samuelson" is spelt incorrectly at one point. Clusters of these are scattered throughout (I marked about 26 errors, but I don't think I marked them all), suggesting the proofreader sampled the text rather than checked it thoroughly.

There is some annoying repetition (he explains twice what stochastic shocks are, for example). And given Warsh's erudition, why is there no bibliography? There is plenty of evidence that he has actually read the primary texts, not cribbed the basics from Economics for Idiots, so it would have been really useful to have had a reference point for how to get more detail.

Despite my criticisms, this is a good, entertaining read. Warsh is at his most impressive when he is piecing together the various strands to the story. This is remarkably complex, with a cast of players worthy of a Cecil B DeMille production, but Warsh makes it look easy.

However, it's not what I'd term an "economics book", insofar as it rarely goes into any subject in any real depth. Not economics for the tabloids, but maybe economics for the Tatler.

And given the number of flaws, I couldn't see how I could give it more than three stars. With better proofreading and a bibliography it would have been four.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


 
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Glorious nerds, 30 Jun 2007
By Jason Rossiter (Manchester) - See all my reviews
If you're looking for the next "Freakonomics" or "Undercover Economist", this isn't quite it. But if you are looking for a riveting intellectual history from a journalist who has been following the profession for decades, look no further. I really adored this book - ostensibly about the importance of knowledge for economic growth, but really a jumping-off point for a carefully-reported history of economic thought for the last hundred years. And although serious, it's also written with a light touch and lots of fascinating anecdotes.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews  
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

   


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.