I Wish I'd Made You Angry Earlier: Essays on Science, Scientists and Humanity by M.F. Perutz  (1)
£8.99
|
The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA by James D. Watson (3)
£6.74
|
Oxygen: The Molecule That Made the World (Popular Science) by Nick Lane  (6)
£6.74
|
This item is not eligible for Amazon Prime, but millions of other items are. Join Amazon Prime today. Already a member? Sign in.
|
|||||||||
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Product details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
See all customer reviews...
Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links(What is this?) |
Headline Printers, Hants
HeadlinePrinters.com
Fast Full Colour Litho Printers NCR-Cards-Leaflets-Stationery-More
Product Description
Amazon.co.uk Review
We live in grim times, Robin Baker recognises in Fragile Science. When sunshine gives you cancer and the butter on your toast clogs your arteries, is it any wonder that clinical depression is sweeping the Western world like a veritable plague? But is sunshine the carcinogen we take it to be? Is cholesterol really bad for us? And how exactly do we know that depression is on the increase? The media interprets science in a way that best serves the public appetite for sensation, for causes--ultimately, for reassurance. The essays in Fragile Science show how you could use the same data to draw very different conclusions: for instance, that it's sun cream that's causing skin cancer; that cholesterol actually binds and mends damaged blood vessels; that GM foods are safer than so-called "natural" foods; and--in a macabre reversal of the accepted account--that it was the rendered tissue of people that first infected cows with BSE. The point is, nothing in biology is certain: biological truth is always manufactured for a political purpose. What's iconoclasm and what's orthodoxy is, of course, largely a matter of perspective. In his final essay, Baker (author of Sperm Wars, a modern classic of social biology) celebrates the way iconoclastic biologists have dented our complacent ideas about free will. But to a new generation (see Lesley Rogers' excellent Sexing the Brain), this sort of genetic determinism is already orthodox, and ripe for demolition. Biology, Baker says, is politically useless. One can't resist asking: where does this leave Baker? --Simon Ings
Review
Science, particularly as portrayed in the media, has an image as a dispassionate, logical and reason-based procedure whose conclusions, when they achieve majority approval, offer us a sure foundation to help us with decisions in our daily lives. Here Robin Baker does what few of us have the resources or time to do: he looks behind this common perception at some of the questions to which we assume science already has given the definite answer. Does cholesterol cause heart problems? Did feeding infected sheeps'
We live in grim times, Robin Baker recognises in Fragile Science. When sunshine gives you cancer and the butter on your toast clogs your arteries, is it any wonder that clinical depression is sweeping the Western world like a veritable plague? But is sunshine the carcinogen we take it to be? Is cholesterol really bad for us? And how exactly do we know that depression is on the increase? The media interprets science in a way that best serves the public appetite for sensation, for causes--ultimately, for reassurance. The essays in Fragile Science show how you could use the same data to draw very different conclusions: for instance, that it's sun cream that's causing skin cancer; that cholesterol actually binds and mends damaged blood vessels; that GM foods are safer than so-called "natural" foods; and--in a macabre reversal of the accepted account--that it was the rendered tissue of people that first infected cows with BSE. The point is, nothing in biology is certain: biological truth is always manufactured for a political purpose. What's iconoclasm and what's orthodoxy is, of course, largely a matter of perspective. In his final essay, Baker (author of Sperm Wars, a modern classic of social biology) celebrates the way iconoclastic biologists have dented our complacent ideas about free will. But to a new generation (see Lesley Rogers' excellent Sexing the Brain), this sort of genetic determinism is already orthodox, and ripe for demolition. Biology, Baker says, is politically useless. One can't resist asking: where does this leave Baker? --Simon Ings
Review
Science, particularly as portrayed in the media, has an image as a dispassionate, logical and reason-based procedure whose conclusions, when they achieve majority approval, offer us a sure foundation to help us with decisions in our daily lives. Here Robin Baker does what few of us have the resources or time to do: he looks behind this common perception at some of the questions to which we assume science already has given the definite answer. Does cholesterol cause heart problems? Did feeding infected sheeps'