This item is not eligible for Amazon Prime, but millions of other items are. Join Amazon Prime today. Already a member? Sign in.

26 used & new from £0.94
See All Buying Options

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Tell a Friend
White Mars
 
See larger image
 
White Mars (Hardcover)
by Roger Penrose (Author), Brian W. Aldiss (Author)
2.3 out of 5 stars  (3 customer reviews)

Availability: Available from these sellers.

26 used & new available from £0.94
Other Editions: RRP: Our Price: Other Offers:
Hardcover 10 used & new from £0.33
Paperback (New Ed) £7.99 £7.59 29 used & new from £0.01
 
   

Product details

  • Hardcover: 336 pages
  • Publisher: Little, Brown (25 Nov 1999)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0316852430
  • ISBN-13: 978-0316852432
  • Average Customer Review: 2.3 out of 5 stars  (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 1,292,085 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category:

    #99 in  Books > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Authors, A-Z > A > Aldiss, Brian

    (Publishers and authors: Improve Your Sales)
  • Other Editions: Hardcover  |  Paperback (New Ed) |  All Editions


Product Description

Amazon.co.uk Review
White Mars is, as its title implies, Brian Aldiss's considered reply to the novels--Red Mars, Green Mars and Blue Mars--in which Kim Stanley Robinson portrayed the terraforming of our neighbour planet and the creation of a utopian society there. Aldiss disapproves of the whole idea of meddling with another world in the first place, and also, more genially, of the melodrama surrounding the creation of Robinson's utopia. Where Robinson's Martians get their chance after near-genocidal warfare on Mars, and environmental disaster on Earth, Aldiss's get theirs as the result of a corruption and scandal-fuelled recession in which supplies for the Martian colony are a victim of cuts. This is, unusually for the shrewd and sometimes cynical Aldiss, a novel with a hero--Tom Jeffreys, the Thomas Jefferson of this Martian revolution:

"His manner was less severe than well controlled. He showed great determination for the cause in which he believed, yet softened it with humour, which sprang from an innate modesty. He was not above self-mockery. In his speech he adopted the manner of a plain man, yet what he said was often unexpected."

This is a very English, and a very urbane book, in which there is an awful lot of talk--about utopia, about consciousness, about sub-atomic particles; Aldiss collaborated on parts of the book with mathematician and physicist Roger Penrose--this is a wise book and also a knowledgeable one. --Roz Kaveney

IAIN BANKS
'Brian Aldiss is one of the most influential and one of the best SF writers Britain has ever produced.'

See all Product Description


Tag this product

 ( What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
Search Products Tagged with
 

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star: 33%  (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star: 66%  (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Challenging and thought provoking, 6 Mar 2000
By A Customer
In contrast to the above review I really enjoyed White Mars, almost for the same reasons that the previous review disliked. Firstly, I can honestly say that the central idea of this book, viz. what we do with Mars when we get there is powerfully realised.

While reading Robinson "Red Mars" I couldn't really identify with the "Reds", or the eco-terrosists. They reminded me of old-fashioned environmentalism, and "Greenpeace" type pretentiousness. I don't believe you need to be a hippie, extreme nature lover, mystical "mother godess" or just anti-authority and "anti-western" type to want to protect a natural environment. This is a stereotype that needs to be put to rest.

However, the appeal for a "White Mars" along the lines of the Antartic Treaty ( an Ayers Rock in the sky- to quote the book) I found persuasive and quite moving. This book change my point of view in the way that Robinsons "Reds" never could. In White Mars it is democracy that is the force behind the planets protection. I believe this is a point that is worth noting. " ecotage" is not required.

Secondly, I quite liked the characters in this novel, especially Jeffries. The character is well realised, and when you learn his motivations you like him even more. Aldiss brings a great sense of compassion and humanity (and humility) to this character. This alone makes White Mars a much more pleasurable experience then Red Mars. Who can say they really liked any of the characters in Red Mars? It is that novels weakness.

Thirdly, the science in this novel is top rate. I come from a scientific background and few SciFi novles challenge me as much as this one. Penrose's influence shines through. Alot of the ideas a very original, especially on the biological side. For example, I have never read a novel where the whole biosphere on a harsh planet learns to survive by continued co-operation and symbiosis. This is a nice evolutionary thesis that I'm sure will be copied.I've argued with friends that no large scale intelligent life could live on Mars for the same Darwinian reasons reasons that Aldiss characters use. Yet as we all know, natural selection though the most dominant mechanism for evolution ( on Earth at least.) it is not the only one. The physics is alos very interesting as is another reason why I'll be coming back to this novel.

Lastly, the Utopia which the first reviewer took such a large issue with. Quite frankly I didn't have any problem with it. Yet again I found I could identify with it alot more than in the "Mars" books. I don't see how it could be "chilling". Though I realise that a "utopia" based on science and reason is probably not fashionable, as opposed to old fashioned. It probably has more to do with HG Wells (Shape of things to come, etc) than anything else. Obviously, the 60's and 70's killed these visions off. Now, they all become horrible dystopias where everyone loses their freedom and humanity. Still, runnig around naked in the forest, singing with the birds, while taking tonns of drugs and engaging in love ceremonies will probably see