Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent narrative on Ancient war and politics, 3 Jan 2007
Adrian Goldsworthy has combined ancient sources and modern interpretations to give us a breathtaking account of the three wars which raged between Rome and its Mediterranean rival, Carthage over the course of a century. One of his strengths is his ability to describe the complex logistics and manoeuvres of the significant battles of this era. He also gives perceptive accounts of the political machinations which brought about the policies, alliances and betrayals of the period.
The most successful and effective general of the entire tale, is Hannibal, one of the Barca family, and Goldsworthy gives him his due, describing the tactics by which he invaded Rome from Spain, and humiliated legion after Roman legion. However the narrative is clear that Hannibal's invasion was a gamble - he ditched his heavier equipment in order to speed the crossing of the Alps, and arrived in Rome without the ability or inclination to capture population centres. It is here that Goldsworthy's admiration of the sheer obduracy of the Romans shines through. Hannibal, with Italy at his feet, after destroying many legions, sent negotiators to treat with Rome. To his astonishment, the negotiators were sent away, unheard. The Romans simply would not be defeated, Hannibal was impotent to take the city, and though he roamed undefeated in the Italian peninsula for many years, his enemy would not give up.
There are detailed accounts of the rise and re-election of various Roman consuls and generals, the authoritarian nature of the elected elite, and the various factions which ruled Rome. I found it interesting that those plebs who did achieve elective office and military leadership, sometimes found that while their ascent was meteoric, their lack of privileged family backround could prove their undoing when events moved against them.
It has been said that history is written by the victors, and the book is significantly less descriptive and detailed when dealing with Carthaginian affairs. However I think the spirit of the Romans shines through, their ability to describe their own society, their sheer self-belief led to their creating and leaving detailed accounts of themselves and their society in a way which was unmatched among their neighbouring societies.
Overall this is an excellent survey of the events, and contains significant pointers for a deeper study of the various elements.
|
|
|
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
An informed, accessible introduction, 19 Sep 2004
Adrian Goldsworthy provides an entertaining and accessible account of the Punic Wars, which those with no classical education should find an interesting read. Goldsworthy himself points out the fact that the British education system would have rendered this account unnecessary fifty years ago, but the decline of Latin as a school subject has left a generation (at least) unfamiliar with this long conflict. Goldsworthy attempts to identify the facts of the battles as distinct from the conjecture, and is at pains to point out the limits of knowledge today (even with the benefits of archaeology to help lift some of the uncertainty). He also makes it clear that we must regard the sources as being tainted from the victor's perspective - for of course no Punic accounts of the conflicts survive. He uses general knowledge of the period to explain the context in which the wars were taking place, and how the changes in technology led to changes in the way in which war was being carried out. This well-rounded account is supplemented with maps of the several of the battles, facilitating comprehension. However, there are no diagrams or pictures of other aspects of the time (a reproduction of a Trireme, for instance would have been a useful supplement to the lengthy descriptions of the text). This omission aside, the book is a good general read, going beyond a simple recitation of events, which serves to put the wars in an appropriate context.
|
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
Probably the best book about the Punic wars, 6 Jun 2009
Saying that this is the best book on the subject is quite assumptive, seeing as I haven't read any other book regarding the Punic wars, but the book was just so entertaining and well written, that I can't imagine there being a superior one out there.
Adrian Goldsworty is the perfect balance between an author and a scholar, which is a balance that makes for educated and researched history, presented in a well written and interesting fashion. I've already ordered two more books from him and I'm eagerly looking forward to them.
The large scale of the three wars and the fragmented sources makes it a hard subject to tackle, but even harder to present it in a cohesive and entertaining way. Instead of presenting all the facts in a chronological order he divides the wars into categories, like in the first war is divided into, land battles and navy battles, and the second war into Italy, Spain, Africa and Greece\Macedonia. This is a great way to present the story and makes it easy to follow regardless of the multitude of battles going on simultaneously all over the Mediterranean.
As all good historians he is critical of his sources and doesn't assume to be sure about anything in this ca. 2300 year old war. If there's a dubious story from any of the sources he'll point it out and where there's lack of any good sources he informs you that this section is only conjecture on his part. He never tries to rewrite history or distort facts to tell his own story, you'll receive an objective and faithful presentation throughout the book.
Highly recommended to anyone interested in Roman history or ancient warfare in general.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|