Napoleon and Wellington (Hardcover)

Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Gamble (Making History) by Andrew Roberts 4.4 out of 5 stars (5)  £5.99

Wellington: The Iron Duke by Richard Holmes 4.6 out of 5 stars (7)  £6.99

Waterloo [DVD] [1970] DVD ~ Rod Steiger 4.2 out of 5 stars (24)

Napoleon by F.J. McLynn 3.2 out of 5 stars (12)  £10.49

Wellington by Elizabeth Longford 4.2 out of 5 stars (4)  £5.99

› Explore similar items

Amazon.co.uk Review
After his provocative Eminent Churchillians and his magisterial, award-winning Salisbury, Andrew Roberts' Napoleon and Wellington moves further back into the past to examine those titans of early 19th-century Europe. One was revolutionary, one deeply conservative. One aimed to change everything, the other aimed to achieve nothing except to stop the other changing anything. Roberts pre-empts the obvious moan regarding this well-tilled field, by pointing out that this is the first book to examine exactly what the two men thought of each other, and revealing the fascinating contradiction between what they said in public and in private. Roberts' cautious, subtle reading of character, and the narrow focus on just two men--not a mention of Rifleman Harris here--gives the book a novelistic brio. Wellington could be every bit as vainglorious as Napoleon, but Napoleon was unforgiving. Wellington saved Napoleon from execution after Waterloo, but Napoleon left money in his will to the man who had tried to assassinate the Duke. And once Napoleon had gone, Wellington amassed endless trophies of his great enemy--including not one but two of the Emperor's mistresses. Roberts' wry comment: "To sleep with one of Napoleon's mistresses might be considered an accident, but to sleep with two might suggest a pattern of triumphalism..." English readers, who have long lived with the notoriously bitchy comment from another of Wellington's mistresses, that one of their greatest national heroes was, in bed at least, "a cold fish," will be delighted to hear a second opinion from one of these ex-Imperial bed-warmers, that compared to Napoleon, Wellington was "beaucoup le plus fort". So there. Roberts is witty as well as wise, with chapter titles such as "The War for Clio's Ear". And he ends on a provocative, characteristically Euro-sceptic note: Wellington may have won at Waterloo, but today's "politically united Europe led by a centralised (French-led) bureaucracy", represents a final triumph for the Napoleonic vision... touché. --Christopher Hart

Review
Roberts' study of the two greatest opposing generals of their age instantly recalls Alan Bullock's highly praised Hitler and Stalin. Here we also have two titans who, even though violently opposed, had much in common. This is a highly original revisionist study of the two men and some readers may be surprised by the fresh interpretation placed upon some well-known events. Napoleon praised Wellington's ruthlessness in private but criticised him as a mere "sepoy general" in public; Wellington in contrast publicly lauded the Corsican and his value on the battlefield, but in his correspondence criticised his military techniques. The British General saved Bonaparte from assassination after Waterloo, and Napoleon bequeathed money to the man who tried to kill the Duke (later Prime Minister). This animosity, mixed with admiration, charged the relationship between the two men and lies at the heart of this book. Fortunately Roberts makes light work of the contradictions. The legacy of both men has helped to shape modern Europe and, ultimately, it is this mixed achievement which makes this account so interesting.

See all Product Description

Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover

Search inside this book:

6 Reviews 5 star:  (2) 4 star:  (3) 3 star:    (0) 2 star:    (0) 1 star:  (1)           Average Customer Review 3.8 out of 5 stars (6 customer reviews)		Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews   9 of 9 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars If you have even the most cursory interest in either subject, 1 Oct 2005 By  J. Myers "gelatinelens" (Tyne and Wear, England) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)    This review is from: Napoleon and Wellington: The Long Duel (Paperback) Roberts sets out his ideas in a lucid and impartial fashion, allowing events to speak for themselves. Beginning with a brief outline of the two men's similarities - we then discover the fateful steps which demand that their fates must intersect. Waterloo is the venue of that junction - with Wellington's star still in its ascendancy, and Napoleon's upon the wane. On the day, Roberts shows us Wellington as a man who's militaristic skills have been honed directly by confrontation with the best marshals and generals Napoleon had previously mustered against him in Spain. Napoleon himself described the Peninsular War as a 'school for British soldiers'. Wellington is obsessed with tiny details, and so respectful of Napoleon's tactics, that he anticipates wide flanking manoeuvres and plans pre-emptive measures against them. Napoleon, by contrast, is a man in ill health. Perhaps unaware of the number of Wellington's true force, delegating responsibility to a level that he has never before adopted. A man of previously great strategies, wearily repeating himself - the best of his army lost in Russia, three years earlier. On the day, Roberts shows us Wellington as the man prepared. The aftermath of Waterloo sees a profound change in both men. Napoleon, wrongly believing Wellington responsible for his exile, becomes bitter and mean-spirited towards the man he once respected. So petty that he even bequests 10,000 francs to Wellington's failed assassin. Wellington, the man actually responsible for Napoleon's continued existence, becomes a somewhat ghoulish collector of Napoleonic ephemera - and spends the rest of his life referencing his greatest battle, either as a 'party piece' or correcting the mistakes of an antagonistic press. Roberts paints an equally vivid portrait of the environments these two men inhabited. Napoleon, becoming an icon within his own lifetime, invulnerable to criticism - controlling the domestic press. Whilst Wellington is often undone by the actions of his own countrymen - whether it be the leaked dispositions of British troops or Napoleon deriving ceaseless encouragement from his British 'fan club' of Whigs. Ultimately, Wellington seems well aware of his subordinate place in history. And, astonishingly, in the later years of his life, even questions the benefit of Napoleon's removal - over the continuance of the Bourbon thrones. Such is the power of Robert's writing, the reader may ask themselves the same question. Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)   15 of 16 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Interesting Viewpoint of Napoleon and Wellington, 16 May 2002 By A Customer The popular viewpoint of these famous foes is that Napoleon totally underestimated Wellington therefore his defeat at Waterloo was inevitable. Author Roberts examines their relationship in great detail and his conclusions regarding their opinion of one and other will startle most readers. Although most of what's written here is of a highly conjectural nature, there is little doubt that there was much more of a psychological battle brewing between these rivals than most historians will care to admit. Was Napoleon's "bad-mouthing" of Wellington merely "sour grapes" after Waterloo? Roberts points out that Napoleon was certainly saved from execution after the battle by Wellington, but the Duke probably had alterior motives besides humanitarian reasons. Roberts gets some good mileage out of the fact that the Europe of today is much more in line with the vision that Napoleon had two-hundred years ago. Wellington's old-school aristocracy is merely a remnant of the past now. That shouldn't prejudice the reader, however, to favor the Emperor over the Duke. Wellington did have the distinct advantage of out-living Napoleon by nearly forty years although his own political career as Prime Minister of Great Britain was less than successful. Political and military accomplishments aside, Wellington made it a point during his long life to at least publicly admire Napoleon "the general" even if he regarded the ex-Emperor's reforms with distaste. To his credit, despite all the honors and glory heaped upon Wellington after Waterloo, he never bragged about the victory or used it, either publicly or privately, to insult the vanguished prisoner on St. Helena. His real true opinion of Napoleon, like Napoleon's own viewpoint, will never be known. Roberts at least gives us an insider's view on what might have been. It makes one inevitably sorry that these two titans of the 19th Century never had the opportunity to sit down for a nice long chat. Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)   12 of 14 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Fairly easy to read comparison of the 2 'great' men., 20 Jan 2002 By  finburg@eggconnect.net (United Kingdom) - See all my reviews One of the most helpful pieces of information in this dual Biography is the date by date list of key events in the lives of the protagonists which forms a useful and easy to follow reference at the front of the book. The information is handled well and with a degree of challenge to the popular views of the great men. For instance it seems that there was some respect between each regarding their respective military abilities despite all the propoganda and the post event rationalisations. It did leave me wondering whether Wellington was able to learn from all his involvement in the great events of the time, the subjct of another book, perhaps? As for the Emperor he 'lost' but eventually ended up with a much more impressive funeral and final resting place in Paris. Roberts also offers us a tempting glimpse of the sexual morality of the 2 great men, both were inveterate womanisers and Wellington went out of his way to collect Napoleon's former lovers when he was in Town! The final conclusion is thought provoking, Napoleons vision of a European state, run by a central legistlative body, dominated by the French,with a central HQ 15 miles from Waterloo! Mon Dieu, Wellington would be turning in that elegant final resting place in St Pauls. Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this) Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review › See all 6 customer reviews...		Ad feedback   Most Recent Customer Reviews 4.0 out of 5 stars The Clash of Reputations Andrew Roberts has the two qualities essential to the historian: academic substance and a good literary style. Read more Published 4 months ago by Oliver Twist 5.0 out of 5 stars Very good partly because it goes beyond Waterloo Napoleon and Wellington: the Long Duel is a very interesting work by Andrew Roberts. I have read a number of his works and this is certainly up there with the best of them. Read more Published 15 months ago by HBH 1.0 out of 5 stars Poor attempt to add a new flavour to this well troden subjec Andrew Roberts has attempted to link the lives of Wellington and Napoleon by examining their personalities and tastes. Read more Published on 27 Jan 2002 by Roderick B. Jones Search Customer Reviews Only search this product's reviews › See all 6 customer reviews...

Books for summer: A list by Sam P   My Favourite Films: A list by "jordan_perryuk"   Napoleonic Wars: A list by Mr Thomas McDonnell Create a Listmania! list

Search Listmania!

• Books > Biography > Historical > 1701-1900
• Books > Biography > Historical > Countries & Regions > Europe
• Books > Biography > Political
• Books > History > Europe > Enlightenment, Revolution & Empire 1751-1900
• Books > History > Other Historical Subjects > Historians > Roberts, Andrew

• Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
• I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
• I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.