This item is not eligible for Amazon Prime, but millions of other items are. Join Amazon Prime today. Already a member? Sign in.

3 used & new from £0.01
See All Buying Options

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Tell a Friend
A Darwinian Left (Darwinism Today)
 
See larger image
 
A Darwinian Left (Darwinism Today) (Hardcover)
by Peter Singer (Author)
3.5 out of 5 stars  (2 customer reviews)

Availability: Available from these sellers.

3 used & new available from £0.01

Product details
  • Hardcover: 64 pages
  • Publisher: Weidenfeld & Nicolson (9 Sep 1999)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0297643363
  • ISBN-13: 978-0297643364
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 1,263,024 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)
    (Publishers and authors: Improve Your Sales)

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links (What is this?)
Evolution is a lie
www.prophecyandtruth.com    What does science evidence prove? Is evolution in the bible? 

Product Description
Amazon.co.uk Review
Marx approved of Darwin, up to a point. The Englishman's theories explained biological form scientifically, without recourse to a Creator. But the idea that evolution offered insights into psychology and social behaviour was anathema to the Left, whose belief that human nature was a mere "ensemble of social relations", would have terrible consequences. The Right, meanwhile, was quick to harness "survival of the fittest" to ideas of progress. Economic might was regarded as the overriding agent of social evolution; those disenfranchised in the rush for capital "deserved" to be left behind. Today, evolutionary maths has developed to the point where it can show how co-operation and altruism emerge in nature. Can the Left harness this new thinking to challenge the Right's proprietorial claims on what has been dubbed the single most important idea of the century? Peter Singer's book--part of a series of handsomely packaged essays on recent Darwinian thought--dwells far more on past errors than on the possibilities for a Left-wing future. He seems also to have swallowed rather uncritically some of the more reactionary pronouncements of the evolutionary psychologists. (For a useful corrective, see Lesley Rogers' Sexing the Brain.) Nevertheless, this little volume--a perfect stocking-filler for broadsheet readers of all political hues--offers much food for thought. "Properly understood, self-interest is broader than economic self- interest," Singer writes. "Public policy does not have to rely on self- interest in this narrow economic sense. It can, instead, appeal to the widespread need to feel wanted, or useful, or belong to a community." Thatcherites take note. --Simon Ings

Product Description
The application of Darwinian ideas to social and political thinking is one of the most controversial intellectual developments of our time, stirring up fierce debate among a wide range of people including scientists, social scientists, journalists, economists, psychiatrists, philosophers and lawyers. Darwinism Today is a series of short books that introduces readers to the cutting edge of these debates. Written by leading Darwinian scholars, the books show how issues as disparate as the nature of aggression and the definition of female beauty can be illuminated in unexpected ways by recent advances in evolutionary biology, and reveal the implications of such findings for society. In A Darwinian Left Peter Singer looks at why the left-wing is so contemptuous of these biological theories of behaviour. If humans are indeed born cooperators as research suggests, why does the right claim Darwinism as its own? The author traces the history of this intellectual divide and concludes that it is high time the left radically revised its outdated view of human nature. He shows how the insights of modern evolutionary theory can help to set realistic and realizable goals, reinvigorating left-wing thinking for the next millennium. This is a new vision of the political left from one of the leading moral philosophers of our time.

See all Product Description

Tag this product

 ( What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
Search Products Tagged with
 

 

Customer Reviews

2 Reviews
5 star: 50%  (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star: 50%  (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Naturalistic Fallacy anyone?, 7 Jan 2001
By A Customer
As laudable an aim as Singer has, to reconcile Darwinian thinking and the left, he commits the same fallacy of equating natural processes with social processes that the right has so often been criticised for.

This is highlighted in his use of the Prisoner's Dilemma and the work of Axelrod to show that there will always be cheaters in a system of cooperation. Now as an evolutionary game the Prisoner's Dilemma will indeed always evolve cheaters to exploit suckers but in the social world we are not talking about evolution at all but behaviour. Will there always be people who become cheaters if there are suckers to exploit? That is an open question of human nature unrelated to evolution as the time frame doesn't allow any effect on reproduction to become apparant (if, indeed, humans are still evolving in a classical Darwinian way).

In his rejection of Marxist and sociological ideas of society being the primary determinant in human social behaviour Singer throws out the baby with the bath water. Human nature is certainly not a tabla rasa but nor is it 100% genetically predetermined, we have to be careful not to push the emphasis too far the other way.

There is no doubting that evoutionary processes have lead to the development of mankind and the human brain. However much of our morality and social rules are embodied in our brain through our interactions with the social world rather than being purely predetermined genetically.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? YesNo (