This item is not eligible for Amazon Prime, but millions of other items are. Join Amazon Prime today. Already a member? Sign in.

13 used & new from £1.99
See All Buying Options

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Tell a Friend
The Hedgehog, the Fox and the Magister's Pox: Mending and Minding the Misconceived Gap Between Science and the Humanities
 
See larger image
 
The Hedgehog, the Fox and the Magister's Pox: Mending and Minding the Misconceived Gap Between Science and the Humanities (Hardcover)
by Stephen Jay Gould (Author)
2.5 out of 5 stars  (4 customer reviews)

Availability: Available from these sellers.

13 used & new available from £1.99
Other Editions: RRP: Our Price: Other Offers:
Hardcover (1) 10 used & new from £2.12
Paperback (Reprint) 11 used & new from £5.35
 
   

Product details
  • Hardcover: 274 pages
  • Publisher: Jonathan Cape (29 May 2003)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 022406309X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0224063098
  • Product Dimensions: 23.4 x 15.4 x 3.2 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 822,671 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)
    (Publishers and authors: Improve Your Sales)
  • Other Editions: Hardcover (1) |  Paperback (Reprint) |  All Editions


Product Description
Amazon.co.uk Review
Though this final book is not the most accessible of Stephen Jay Gould's meditations on science and culture, it is a complex and revealing look at one of the late paleontologist's great passions: the unity of human endeavour. The titular hedgehog and fox refer to the classic dichotomy of persistence opposed to agility of thought, which Gould uses as a backbone in comparing, contrasting and balancing science and the humanities. Unlike many scientists, he does not consider humanities (nor religion) to be inferior to his discipline.

Drawing liberally from Renaissance and Scientific Revolution sources, Gould shows that the perceived differences in the two cultures are mostly false. Readers of EO Wilson's Consilience will find many similarities here, though Gould emphatically rejects Wilson's conclusion that reductionism is an appropriate way to unite the two cultures and offers examples of when such an approach might fail.

If we discover that a majority of human cultures have favored infanticide under certain conditions, and that such a practice arose for good Darwinian reasons, shall we then claim that we have resolved the question of the rightness of such a practice with a "yea"?

This volume is presented by its editor almost unchanged from the manuscript Gould had finished shortly before his death. The result is a book with such unedited detail that its dense blend of history and philosophy is at times overwhelmingly difficult. Nevertheless, Gould's deeply held conviction that human understanding comes from every one of our cultural efforts shines through. --Therese Littleton, Amazon.com

Book Description
The latest book from the most celebrated popular science writer in the world. Gould uses the centuries-old conflict between science and the humanities - between the notion of relying solely on experiment and that of reason and imagination - to delve into burning scientific issues of the past and present.

See all Product Description


Tag this product

 ( What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
Search Products Tagged with
 

 

Customer Reviews

4 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star: 25%  (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star: 75%  (3)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Phew.....finished !, 24 Sep 2003
You're going to need a quiet corner to tackle this one.

One thing to make clear first - the manuscript for this book was written just before the author's death. It was published un-altered, and I suspect that the author would have taken a couple of iterations with an editor before committing it to print.

Gould's argumnet here is, bascially, that the physical sciences and the social sciences need to get it together a bit more. By sharing techniques across disciplines, we get arrive at much more insightful solutions.

I couldn't agree more.

But Gould seems to choose some odd examples throughout the book to demonstrate this point, which, I feel, don't fit the argument too well.

And the style of the writing is rich but rambling - it would sound good if delivered as spoken word in mad scientist lecture format, but in the written word it's a chore.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? YesNo (