or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
40 used & new from £1.50
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
 
 
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book

Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) (Paperback)

by David DeGrazia (Author) "Acting on an anonymous tip in April 2001, Compassion Over Killing (COK), a Washington, DC-based animal rights organization, began investigating an enormous industrial hen house..." (more)
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
RRP: £7.99
Price: £4.78 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £3.21 (40%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Only 5 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want guaranteed delivery by Tuesday, November 10? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
26 new from £3.11 14 used from £1.50

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Frequently Bought Together

Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) + Animal Liberation + In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave
Price For All Three: £26.57

Show availability and shipping details

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Animal Liberation

Animal Liberation

by Peter Singer
5.0 out of 5 stars (7)  £9.98
In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave

In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave

by Peter Singer
5.0 out of 5 stars (2)  £11.81
Do Animals Have Rights?

Do Animals Have Rights?

by Alison Hills
3.4 out of 5 stars (5)  £5.48
The Case for Animal Rights

The Case for Animal Rights

by T Regan
£13.65
Animal Rights and Wrongs

Animal Rights and Wrongs

by Roger Scruton
2.7 out of 5 stars (3) 
› Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 144 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford Paperbacks (21 Feb 2002)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0192853600
  • ISBN-13: 978-0192853608
  • Product Dimensions: 16.8 x 10.6 x 1.2 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 173,075 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category:

    #33 in  Books > Science & Nature > Biological Sciences > Animal Sciences > Animal Rights

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Product Description

Do animals have moral rights? If so, what does this mean? What sorts of mental lives do animals have, and how should we understand welfare? By presenting models for understanding animals' moral status and rights, and examining their mental lives and welfare, David DeGrazia explores the implications for how we should treat animals in connection with our diet, zoos, and research. Animal Rights distinguishes itself by combining intellectual rigour with accessibility, offering a distinct moral voice with a non-polemical tone.


About the Author

David DeGrazia is Associate Professor of Philosophy at George Washington University in Washington, DC. He is the author of Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status (1996) and of numerous articles in philosophy and ethics journals He is also co-editor, with Thomas Mappes, of Biomedical Ethics (2001). Currently he is researching various topics at the intersection of personal identity theory and bioethics.
Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
Acting on an anonymous tip in April 2001, Compassion Over Killing (COK), a Washington, DC-based animal rights organization, began investigating an enormous industrial hen house owned by agricultural company ISE-America in Cecilton, Maryland. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
very short introductions
very short introduction
animal rights

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
74% buy the item featured on this page:
Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) 4.7 out of 5 stars (3)
£4.78
Animal Liberation
12% buy
Animal Liberation 5.0 out of 5 stars (7)
£9.98
In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave
8% buy
In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave 5.0 out of 5 stars (2)
£11.81
Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
4% buy
Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) 3.3 out of 5 stars (3)
£4.78
Explore similar items
 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars small, perfectly formed, 6 Nov 2003
I'd lend my copy this book to anyone even vaguely interested in the subject. I can't really assess how sound the philosophy behind the ideas in this book is, because i don't really know it, but as an outline of the main animal rights theories, its impeccable. DeGrazia has written more academic works, but this is very straightforward and accessible, it certainly made me think about animals in a different way.

Criticism - its not impartial. The author quickly states his own perspective and views, and these always seem to get the most covereage. He appears to sometimes dismiss criticism of animal rights a bit too flippantly. But overall, this is a very readable and interesting book.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
4.0 out of 5 stars Rights and Wrongs, 27 Jul 2009


The philosophy of "animal rights" has a bad reputation, largely because of the statements of animal rights activists such as Jerry Vlasak who advocated the assassination of scientists involved in animal research and Tim Daly who announced his support for petrol bombs, bombs under cars and shooting vivisectors on their own doorstep.

In recent times scientists working for companies involved in such research have been the victims of bomb hoaxes, harassment and threatening phone calls while, in December 2008, seven activists were found guilty of conspiracy to blackmail companies. Apparently, activists thought human rights were worth less than those of other animals. So much for their claim that the movement is based on "love and compassion."

Of course, it would be manifestly unfair to judge animal rights philosophy by the extreme activities of a few wingnuts, just as it is unfair to judge Islam by the events of 9/11, or Christianity by the murder of abortionists, but the idea of animal rights appears to have overtaken the concept of animal welfare, a concept which has been around for a long time. In common with many ideas the appeal of animal rights is couched in the language of reason but based on the practice of emotionalism. This book illustrates the point perfectly.

The underlying weakness of animal rights lies in its philosophical foundation. If Darwinism is correct and only the fit survive then the superiority of human beings over other animals is natural. However, Peter Singer, whose work, Animal Liberation (1975), argued on utilitarian grounds that as animals could feel pleasure and pain they should be considered as having "rights" is a nonsense to which many of the "moral" arguments evidenced in this short work attest. Animal Rights' philosophy treats dogs as equal with humans as opposed to the former deserving humanised treatment. The extremists boast they would rather save a bright dog at the expense of a retarded child.

As has been pointed out by critics, animal rights is a hotch-pot of unrelated streams of thought superimposed on the failed philosophy of liberalism with a pinch of Marxism thrown in to raise the emotional temperature. As Edward Skidelsky noted in a New Statesman article, " A right is an active possession, not a passive bequest. It is something you can assert or forgo; something you can defend or relinquish. Animals cannot fight for their rights, still less can they forgo them. To grant rights to animals would be to empty that term of what little meaning it still possesses". The relationship between humans and animals is inherently unequal. To pretend otherwise is to live in cloud cuckoo land.

However, while the philosophical arguments regurgitated in the book aren't worth the paper they are written on, the practical examples of the inappropriate treatment of animals, factory farming, animals in cages or killed for human pleasure, certainly are. Human beings have an obligation not to inflict cruelty on animals for its own sake. I'm not enamoured of keeping animals in zoos rather than letting them roam in the wild. I've never understood the mentality of fox-hunting since I read one hunter's stupid claim that, "the fox enjoys it". In addition, I cannot understand why anyone would want to drown the dog which is now looked after by my daughter. The dog has never explained it to me either.

There are some solid arguments produced in the book, particularly those on animal welfare. The question of whether experiments carried out on one species is to right way to find out if they will work on another requires an answer. Using animals to test cosmetics, in my view, constitutes an arrogance based on vanity not humanity. I agree wholeheartedly with the author (who is clear in where he stands on issues) that animals are not mere tools for the use of humans. Similarly, rational arguments for treating animals ethically has merit.

However, those ethics are the ethics of human beings not the rights of the animals themselves. Using the ends to justify the means has always been a political decision and animal rights is simply another re-statement of the supremacy of politics in all human relationships both with animals and with each other.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
5.0 out of 5 stars As an introduction, it is perfect, 16 May 2009
I used this as an introductory book, as it were, to animal ethics and theory in other books.

David DeGrazia, an authoritive author on animal rights literature, examines briefly three main issues that demand a reasoned perspective on animal welfare, and these are: animals for food (namely meat), keeping pets and zoo animals and animals research.

DeGrazia transcends over the two most principal ethical theories in this field: Utilitarianism and the "strong animal rights view" (mainly advocated by Tom Regan). He applies these theories to the areas in which animals are used above, and also uses the less used "sliding-scale model", a model which assesses the relative treatment of animals based on their cognitive, emotional and social complexity.

By doing so DeGrazia shows us that animals ought to be considered, and that there is more than one way of doing so.

Anyone interested in the animal rights debate, whether for or against, or someone endeavouring to start reading literature on animal ethics, you should read this book.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category

Look for similar items by subject



















i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.