or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
47 used & new from £0.58
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Free Will: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
 
 
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book

Free Will: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) (Paperback)

by Thomas Pink (Author)
2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
RRP: £7.99
Price: £4.79 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £3.20 (40%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Want guaranteed delivery by Wednesday, November 11? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
31 new from £0.63 16 used from £0.58

Special Offers and Product Promotions

Frequently Bought Together

Free Will: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) + Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) + The Brain: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
Price For All Three: £14.33

Show availability and shipping details

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

by Susan Blackmore
4.3 out of 5 stars (9)  £4.77
The Brain: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

The Brain: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

by Michael O'Shea
4.0 out of 5 stars (4)  £4.77
Emotion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

Emotion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

by Dylan Evans
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £4.77
Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

by Simon Blackburn
3.3 out of 5 stars (3)  £4.78
Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

Dreaming: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

by J. Allan Hobson
3.3 out of 5 stars (3)  £4.79
› Explore similar items

Product details

  • Paperback: 144 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford Paperbacks (24 Jun 2004)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0192853589
  • ISBN-13: 978-0192853585
  • Product Dimensions: 16.8 x 10.7 x 1 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 171,641 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category:

    #5 in  Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Philosophy > Topics > Free Will & Determinism

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Product Description

Every day we seem to make and act upon all kinds of free choices - some of them trivial, and some so consequential that they may change the course of our life, or even the course of history. But are these choices really free? Or are we compelled to act the way we do by factors beyond our control? Is the feeling that we could have made different decisions just an illusion? And if our choices are not free, why should we be held morally responsible for our actions? This Very Short Introduction, written by a leading authority on the subject, looks at a range of issues surrounding this fundamental philosophical question, exploring it from the ideas of the Greek and medieval philosophers through to the thoughts of present-day thinkers. It provides a interesting and incisive introduction to this perennially fascinating subject.


About the Author

Thomas Pink is Lecturer in Philosophy at King's College, London. He works mainly in ethics, philosophy of mind and action, political philosophy, and philosophy of law. He also works on medieval and early modern philosophy. His publications include The Psychology of Freedom (CUP, 1996), and the edited collection (with Martin Stone) Theories of Human Action and the Will (forthcoming). He is also an associate editor of Mind.
Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(1)
See all 2 tags...

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Free Will: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
68% buy the item featured on this page:
Free Will: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) 2.0 out of 5 stars (7)
£4.79
Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
9% buy
Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) 4.3 out of 5 stars (9)
£4.77
Emotion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
8% buy
Emotion: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) 4.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£4.77
The Brain: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)
7% buy
The Brain: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) 4.0 out of 5 stars (4)
£4.77
Explore similar items
 

Customer Reviews

7 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:
 (3)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.0 out of 5 stars (7 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars AN EMBARASSMENT TO PHILOSOPHY AND TO THE VERY SHORT INTRODUCTION SERIES, 3 Nov 2007
I have read a large number of the Very Short Introduction series and am on the whole very impressed with them. Reading this particular book, however, I felt I was reading a very bad exam paper. The text is replete with the type of flawed argumentation one would expect from a keen but unpromising high school pupil. It was so bad that I was able to find at least one major flaw per page, often more. Some of the worst flaws include:

* Pink frequently assumes that because something need not be the case that it therefore is not the case.
* Pink fails to present a theory for freedom, relying instead on very poor attempts to undermine the counter-arguments to the case for freedom of the will, arguments he is either willfully distorting or has not understood.
* Pink makes the flawed assumption that theories of causal determinism are necessarily reductive.
* Pink's arguments against determinism, garrulous as they are, are not more sophisticated than 'we have free will because we perceive that we have it'.
* Pink's book is, as another reviewer has highlighted, highly repetitive. In fact, this is an understatement. It could not be more repetitive if it tried. This could easily have fitted onto 30 pages.
* Pink takes certain key terms for granted (e.g. 'we', 'self', 'free agent'), perhaps realising that their definition may undermine his rambling hypotheses.
* At times, Pink seems to assume that prior causation must mean that things are mapped out for the individual since before birth, rather than acknowledging the chaos and flux which is at play in causal relationships. This in itself is an example of the reductionism he readily criticizes elsewhere.
* Pink argues against the Hobbesian view that action is driven by prior desires with the awful counter-example of 'if I am out walking, and decide to take a break on a bench, then decide to get up and continue my walk, that decision is not driven by prior desires'. His notion of temporality is skewed here, for 'man wishes to get up and continue walk, gets up, continues walk' is sufficient to undermine his argument. Immediately prior is still prior.
* In trying to undermine the role of desires in action, he replaces this term with `motivation'. However, he fails to define `motivation' and fails to show how it is any different or any more amenable to freedom than `desire'.
* Et cetera ad nauseum...

All in all, Pink has produced something that is an embarassment to philosophy. He shouldn't be teaching at a university, let alone publishing books. I suggest he goes back to school to learn the very basics of philosophy. Whether you come from the determinist, compatibilist or libertarian camp, this book has only one thing to offer: an example of how not to argue a case for the freedom of the will.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars too much opinion, too little introduction, 5 May 2006
By Chiana (London, UK) - See all my reviews
I have read many of the books in the (generally excellent) Very Short Introduction range, and this is the first that has prompted me to write a review of any kind. Unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons...

For an introduction, I think this is more likely to turn people away from what is in my experience a wonderfully thought provoking subject. The author briefly introduces the key concepts, but then blends in their more detailed explanations with his own personal bias and synthesis; this distorts the meaning of terms, and muddies the debate. If you couple this with his tortured style of prose it becomes in some places both boring and unreadable.

I would recommend anyone interested in the subject to try and find a good anthology of classic texts, to better understand the positions of Hobbes, Hume, Kant and others, which are not as intimidating to the intelligent general reader as many would suppose.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
10 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars A confusing initiation, 16 Feb 2006
By Oliver Lea "Oli Lea" (Portsmouth, England) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This book is easy enough to follow (if you read certain paragraphs twice and can keep up with the typically philosophical endless repetition of the same words in one sentence) and does, I feel give you a good introduction into the subject.

I was a total fresh-face to the subject when I started reading this, and whilst I did feel I was being well informed about the field, there were two things that threw me a little.

The first was that Thomas Pink made it clear that he dissented from the views of most philosophers today about free will. On the whole I liked this, since his conclusion was that free will does exist, and we all like to believe that!

But the biggest thing was the image of the Free Will Problem I had once I had finished the book. Is it just me, or do philosophers seem to have opened up a field to examine something we think we know by common sense (ie, that we DO freely make decisions), and made it immensely complicated, in doing so reaching the conclusion that decisions are not freely made (ie, the Hobbesian view)? And this book comes along and engages with the Hobbesian view, changing it so that free will is possible, but ultimately resting it's conclusion on what we knew by common sense in the first place?

I did come away feeling that the free will problem was something of an unecessary problem. The only way in which is seems to become a valid problem to me is in the medieval context of "how can we have free will if God knows what all our future actions are going to be"? But this subject isn't really engaged, which is understandable given the book's scope.

I enjoyed the book, but I must admit I find the field of Free Will Philosophy a lot less interesting now that I've read it.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

2.0 out of 5 stars Not as compelling an introduction as other Philosophy titles in this series
Pink's book does act as an short and compelling introduction... the question is as to what it introduces. Read more
Published 2 months ago by T. L. Krawec

2.0 out of 5 stars confused presentation of confused thinking
Unfortunately, I can only agree with previous commentators in that this is a rather poor example of the otherwise usually excellent VSI series. Read more
Published 5 months ago by Sebastian Heid

2.0 out of 5 stars Muddled and repetitive
Compared to the other Very Short Introductions I have read, this one is a let-down. For one thing, one would have thought that due to shortage of space, unnecessary repetitions... Read more
Published on 23 Jun 2007 by Hobby Philosopher

3.0 out of 5 stars Crossed Wires
I think this is a good introduction, but not necessarily in the way the author intended it. Thomas Pink suggests there is a 'free will problem' within English language philosophy... Read more
Published on 29 May 2006 by C. H. D. Vermont

Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums

Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category

Look for similar items by subject













i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.