or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
26 used & new from £0.99

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Gamble (Making History)
 
See larger image
 

Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Gamble (Making History) (Hardcover)

by Lisa Jardine (Adapter), Amanda Foreman (Adapter), Andrew Roberts (Author)
4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
RRP: £12.99
Price: £11.69 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £1.30 (10%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Only 2 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want guaranteed delivery by Tuesday, November 17? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
7 new from £2.12 18 used from £0.99 1 collectible from £11.68

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with The Battle: A New History of the Battle of Waterloo by Alessandro Barbero

Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Gamble (Making History) + The Battle: A New History of the Battle of Waterloo
Price For Both: £19.38

Show availability and delivery details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

The Battle: A New History of the Battle of Waterloo

The Battle: A New History of the Battle of Waterloo

by Alessandro Barbero
4.7 out of 5 stars (15)  £7.69
Napoleon and Wellington: The Long Duel

Napoleon and Wellington: The Long Duel

by Andrew Roberts
3.8 out of 5 stars (6)  £6.67
The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War

The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War

by Andrew Roberts
4.7 out of 5 stars (33)  £11.29
The Waterloo Companion: The Complete Guide to History's Most Famous Land Battle

The Waterloo Companion: The Complete Guide to History's Most Famous Land Battle

by Mark Adkin
4.9 out of 5 stars (18)  £28.00
Masters and Commanders: The Military Geniuses Who Led the West to Victory in World War II

Masters and Commanders: The Military Geniuses Who Led the West to Victory in World War II

by Andrew Roberts
4.3 out of 5 stars (13)  £5.97
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 160 pages
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd (7 Feb 2005)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0007190751
  • ISBN-13: 978-0007190751
  • Product Dimensions: 20.2 x 13.8 x 2.2 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 410,714 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in this category:

    #34 in  Books > History > Other Historical Subjects > Historians > Roberts, Andrew

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)
   Historic Napoleonic Games opens new browser window
www.MatrixGames.com  -  Napoleonic Strategy Games Learn History, Change History
  
 

Product Description

Review

Praise for Salisbury: Victorian Titan (Winner of the 1999 Wolfson Prize for History): 'Although constructed on a massive scale, Roberts's book is so beautifully written that one would not wish it a page shorter. It is unlikely ever to be superseded.' Vernon Bogdanor, Times Higher Education Supplement 'Salisbury deserves, and has found, a fine biographer, who has left no stone unturned in his researches, has written cogently and well about his subject, and provided not just a history of Lord Salisbury, but one of the best histories yet of Victorian Britain and her place in the world.' Simon Heffer, Daily Mail Praise for Napoleon & Wellington: 'It is one of Andrew Roberts's merits that, as well as being intelligent, hard-working and opinionated, he gets great fun out of his writing. His books are consequently not only genuinely important but also a pleasure to read.' Philip Ziegler, Daily Telegraph 'Well written and well organised, his study of the relationship between the emperor and the Duke of Wellington is as entertaining as it is instructive, and is original and judicious both as military and personal history.' Christopher Hibbert, The Sunday Times


Sunday Telegraph

'a concise, pacy and well-argued account that puts many of its predecessors...it represents a masterly synthesis of the latest scholarship"

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

5 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.4 out of 5 stars (5 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
38 of 48 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Compact but excellent account of Waterloo., 3 Mar 2005
By O. G. M. Morgan (Hants, England) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
"A slender volume" tends to be a derogatory way to refer to a book, but Andrew Roberts has proved that that need not be the case. Physically, his book is certainly small; if there is a smaller book among the many on the subject of Waterloo, I haven't encountered it. This is so well written, however, that the brevity of the book is no disadvantage. The events are recounted with admirable lucidity, but Roberts still finds space for numerous well-reasoned arguments. He does not set out with an axe to grind, as does Peter Hofschroer (with a degree of justice) and as do numerous French authors, desperately trying to prove that the French actually won the battle. He is properly dismissive of the kind of francophone pseudo-historian who is still unable to accept, one hundred and ninety years after the event, that the French were defeated, or that they deserved to be, but his tone is admirably balanced overall (Hofschroer gets a respectful reference). Roberts never explicitly tries to compare Wellington's generalship with Napoleon's, but does draw attention to the flaws in Napoleon's command on the day: late start, unsubtle tactics, assumption of British inferiority, failure to comprehend the significance of the fact that the Prussians were still very much in play, failure to shift his position, to see the battlefield from another vantage-point. There is an ingenious and actually quite plausible explanation of how the insanely conducted French cavalry charges began. I shan't spoil it here (you'll have to read the book). Admittedly, massed frontal charges were exactly how Napoleon conducted the whole battle, so he may well have ordered them, even if his defenders maintain that that is impossible. Roberts leaves space for some illuminating conclusions about the significance of the victory. Napoleon would almost certainly have been steamrollered by the Russians, even if he had won at Waterloo, but a war won by Russia would have led to a very different Europe in the nineteenth century. I don't think that you can have too many books about this fascinating and dreadful battle. Roberts himself pays tribute to Jac Weller, Ian Fletcher and Mark Adkin and is certainly not seeking to supersede their efforts. As far as modern-day analyses of the battle are concerned, however, you can't go wrong with Adkin's masterpiece and this gem from Andrew Roberts, with Hofschroer's works, perhaps, thrown in for a provocatively different perspective.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Compact but not Bijou, 20 Mar 2007
As a regular battlefield tour guide at the site Andrew Roberts's knowledge of the ground is apparent in this elegant little book. He introduces some interesting aspects of modern analysis, such as climatologist Dennis Wheeler's model of the weather system that deluged the battlefield with `apocalyptic' rainfall: the French guns could not operate effectively until the ground had dried appreciably, causing a serious delay that helped the Prussian army under Marshal Gebhardt von Blücher to come to the Duke of Wellington's assistance. For this battle was not won by the British alone.

However, the book has curious features such as the comment that the Dutch-Belgian component of Wellington's army was not as 'politically, ideologically or racially motivated' as the British. Race is not a factor normally associated with the Napoleonic Wars, and although Mr Roberts pays tribute to them: 'Never should the non-British and non-Prussian contribution to the victory be underestimated ... '; yet despite two-thirds of Wellington's army being non-British, these troops make little impact on the narrative. Anglo-centrism has long been a problem with Waterloo studies, and this book breaks no ground in that direction.

There are technical shortcomings as well, with unit names frequently garbled such as the '95th Rifle Brigade'. In fact the 95th Regiment of Foot (Riflemen) - or 95th Rifles as they were commonly known - ceased to be the 95th when they bacame The Rifle Brigade in 1816. Thus, despite a comment on the back by Paul Johnson that it 'should remain the authoritative account for many years', it falls a long way short of that. But it remains a good read, and should encourage further delving into this fascinating period.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Waterloo Sunset, 23 Feb 2009
Was warfare - of the type which had its last grand "Hurrah!" at Waterloo - the most Extreme Sport of its day? And did it appeal to precisely the type of psychology that enjoys the vicarious thrill of risking life and limb at the very edge of things? These are the questions that Andrew Roberts' book - Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Gamble - has left me with.

Generally speaking, I am not in the habit of reading the Appendices to books of history, but those for Waterloo do contain some particularly entertaining and illuminating letters, plus the famous "Waterloo Despatch" - the Duke's own account of the battle, written on the following day. The extraordinary thing - for me - was that I found the Duke's terse, spare and matter-of-fact relation of the military facts to be the most moving account of all. Even more so than Roberts'. And the Duke's account does indeed confirm how thoroughly he had read his ground and how wisely he had already secured the strategically advantageous points before the commencement of hostilities. This, in itself, contributed greatly to his success.

The book itself is an economical, fast-paced and highly informative account of the battle. It is clear that although both sides made mistakes during the course of the day, those made on the Anglo/Allied side were neither as numerous nor as fundamental as those made by the French. However, allowing La Haye Saint to fall into enemy hands so late in the day - for want of the right sort of ammunition or of the means to transport it to the strategic outpost - was, I think, a more serious error on the part of the Anglo/Allied side than perhaps Roberts is inclined to admit. This could very well have turned the battle in Napoleon's favour and - as things stood - it placed a very nearly intolerable stress upon the Anglo/Allied front line.

Another serious error was the Union Brigade's disobeying of orders and continuing - with disastrous consequences for itself - to charge after D'Erlon's men in retreat. This particular error put me in mind of the reason for the British defeat at Hastings in 1066. They lost because - through a lack of discipline - they broke ranks and pursued the apparently retreating Norman knights down the hillside. A moment of rashness which had nation-losing consequences for themselves and which explains why the British Army has always been big on discipline, order and steadiness in the ranks.

This book has certainly made me curious to read more about Wellington's career before the Waterloo Campaign - and most particularly in the Peninsular War.


Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Last battle of the 18th century
I know, Waterloo was fought in 1815 but Andrew Roberts explains the reference and meaning. I read this book very slowly over a period of around three weeks despite its length... Read more
Published 2 days ago by Arthur King

5.0 out of 5 stars A concise read!
This book is excellent for its concise approach to a comples subject.

I like his new explanation for the start of the French Cavalry charges commencing but also for... Read more
Published 20 months ago by Mr. D. F. Pearson

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

   


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.