Most Helpful Customer Reviews
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
The layout is a nightmare for the average enthusiast, 7 Mar 2010
This review is from: abc Rail Guide 2010 (Ian Allan ABC) (Hardcover)
First impressions are very good. A great hardback cover (the size matches the 'Traction Recognition' book),great colour images and a decent amount of information. However the drawbacks make it tedious to say the least. For the well seasoned and dedicated rail enthusiast, this maybe fine. The amateur/average enthusiast is going to be dissapointed. Instead of putting all of a particular class of locomotive together (as you would expect), they have been split-up into 'train operating companies'. The outcome is that any one class of loco might be owned by a number of different companies, so you have to flick through page after page to track them all down. As if this was not enough, the pages are 'glossy',which makes underlining or highlighting a messy affair. Also considering that this is an A5 size book, the print is no bigger than that of an A6 pocket rail book. Its a lovely book thats been made over-complicated for the average user.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Bees Knees!, 4 May 2010
This review is from: abc Rail Guide 2010 (Ian Allan ABC) (Hardcover)
For those rail enthusiasts who mourn the passing of the Combined Volume this book is a fantastic replacement full details of locos,units,coaching stock and some maintenance and research stock,the book gives full details and vital information essential to the modern rail enthusiast,i delighted with my copy,if i have one criticism it is that it does not contain a full list of London Underground rolling stock,had it done so baring in mind it includes tram operators it would be the perfect book,that said i give it 9 out of 10 for the information it provides!
A essential read for the modern day enthusiast,i recommend it!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Nice idea but could be better, 8 May 2010
This review is from: abc Rail Guide 2010 (Ian Allan ABC) (Hardcover)
It is good to see the 'abc' from Ian Allan back in print. The layout - predominantly by train operating companies (TOCs)- rather than class of locomotive/EMU/DMU is novel but problematic. Updating and checking classes is quite difficult.
A better approach would be to list all of the details and numbers of each class as in the past but to have a new section which lists the TOCs and their rolling stock by unit, carriage and loco number only- thus eliminating the need to repeat basic details many times over (how many times is the weight and length of Class 170 DMU cars repeated?).
The inclusion of imperial locomotive and carriage lengths and widths is bizarre - most of the rolling stock has been built in the metric age and has not had an imperial ruler anywhere near it!
By removing all of the antediluvian imperial units this will free up more space to include some other useful distinguishing information such as coupling type (which is missing).
There are many errors with liveries - assumptions have been made that units have been reliveried just because they have changed TOC. For example six months after publication many of the Clas 321s are still in their original Silverlink livery and not as indicated. And what has happened to Class 90 - 90016? It is missing from all of the lists!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|