£19.99
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Writing Beyond Race: Livi... has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Writing Beyond Race: Living Theory and Practice Paperback – 23 Nov 2012


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
£19.99
£10.81 £12.69
Note: This item is eligible for click and collect. Details
Pick up your parcel at a time and place that suits you.
  • Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
  • Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
How to order to an Amazon Pickup Location?
  1. Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
  2. Dispatch to this address when you check out
Learn more
£19.99 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 2 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

  • Writing Beyond Race: Living Theory and Practice
  • +
  • On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life
Total price: £36.98
Buy the selected items together

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

To get the free app, enter your e-mail address or mobile phone number.




Product details

Product Description

About the Author

A cultural critic, an intellectual, and a feminist writer, bell hooks is best known for classic books including Ain’t I a Woman, Bone Black, All About Love, Rock My Soul, Belonging, We Real Cool, Where We Stand, Teaching to Transgress, Teaching Community, Outlaw Culture, and Reel to Real. hooks is Distinguished Professor in Residence in Appalachian Studies at Berea College, and resides in her home state of Kentucky.


Inside This Book

(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0x9627b66c) out of 5 stars 5 reviews
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x962ad270) out of 5 stars bell hooks is awesome 4 Oct. 2013
By Victoria - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I love the theme in this book: Imperialist White Supremacy Capitalist Patriarchy. She has some interesting pieces of information from history that fit right into it
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x96676e4c) out of 5 stars Wonderful illustration of praxis 27 Jun. 2013
By Amazon Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
Book's series of essays illustrates how living beyond race takes awareness as well as action. I also enjoyed the movie critiques of Crash, The Help, and Precious.
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x96676d50) out of 5 stars Very well written!!! 20 Jun. 2013
By tfisher@amazon - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I really enjoy reading bell hooks, she's one of my favorite authors. In this piece, it can definitely be stated that she has delivered another engaging and provoking collection of essays. Her critiques of contemporary films like "Precious" and "Crash" are on point. I also think she wrote a really brilliant criticism of Rebecca Skloots new work on Henrietta Lacks. At times I have been disappointed with the editors and/or publishing companies who put out Ms. hook's work because there have often been careless typos and complete disregard for her publications. There were a few minor typos/grammatical mistakes with this piece as well. As a frequent reader of authors published by Routledge, I have learned to overlook this, but it can certainly be said that they did much better with this piece. In fact they seem to be getting better in general, and I hope they can keep it up. Overall this was an insightful and enlightening read, anyone who is a fan of bell hooks will be more than pleased.
1 of 6 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x97232d80) out of 5 stars typical hooks... 20 Nov. 2014
By Kelly Hassell - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
Not much to discover... Same bell hooks' tyrants on nebulous life issues. Must read to graduate course in ethnicity and reform, not a choice read.
11 of 34 people found the following review helpful
HASH(0x97349534) out of 5 stars Why was this written? 6 Oct. 2013
By Murray J Siskind - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
bell hooks is back, I guess. I say "I guess" because looking at her Amazon page it's clear that, although she has fallen off the radar as of late, she hasn't exactly stopped publishing. hooks was a big deal in the late 90s when I was in college, and you can see her (baleful) influence in web cultural criticism, which is riddled with familiar "hooksian" tropes ("white male capitalist patriarchy," etc.) as well as her familiar mix of sarcasm and political bellicosity.

Over 30 years, hooks' copious output has spanned feminist theory, cultural criticism, memoir, reflections on teaching, self-help. This book has a little bit of all of that. Bizarrely titled "Writing Beyond Race," the 18 essays in this book are very short and have very little to do with writing beyond race.

The titular chapter is 6 1/2 pages and shoved in the back of the book as the penultimate essay. Its lack of cohesion is symptomatic of the book as a whole. In the essay, hooks tells us that "Home is the only place where there is no race." She tells us she gets up in the morning and looks in a mirror. She sees a pimple. Details pile up. White supremacy diminishes the spirit. She lives in a predominately white community but stays inside to avoid racist whites. She quotes various writers on how to deal with write supremacy (none, unfortunately, work in real estate). With a page to go, hooks tells us she writes at home in a space "beyond race." One of her favorite books is Remembered Rapture. And that's it.

Did you catch that? She "writes beyond race." Me neither.

None of the other essays are any more interesting. hooks indulges in her Kardashian instinct for oversharing, letting us know that she calls her house the "sugar shack," that she met a white male who is nice, that her mother has suffered memory loss.

The cultural criticism isn't any more better. Chapter 6 is purportedly a book review of Manning Marable's biography on Malcolm X. Criticizing it severely--it's a "tabloid expose"--hooks accuses Marable of trying to "assassinate" Malcolm, in large part because Marable conveys the anecdote that Malcolm had had a gay experience once, which had been first reported by a white writer, Bruce Perry, in 1991. The essay totally falls apart at this point--just like it did in 1994, in hooks' Outlaw Culture, when she first wrote about Malcolm in relation to Spike Lee's film. The careful reader will note the differential treatment hooks gives the Perry rumor in the two books. In 1994, it was "the height of white supremacist patriarchal arrogance" for Perry to expose Malcolm's gay experience because "it should have been obvious to anyone familiar with street culture" that Malcolm had committed "unspeakable acts" (163). In other words, if you knew anything about Malcolm you knew he had probably taken a cock; and only an arrogant white male would think he was telling you something you didn't already know. But now, almost 20 years later, although Perry has been "discredited" (based on what, hooks doesn't say, other than Betty's denials!), hooks alleges that mentioning Malcolm might be gay is an effective attack to "depoliticize" him. Which is it? If it was obvious that "street culture" included gay sex (as it apparently was in 1994 when criticizing white male patriarch Perry), then how can Marable's making explicit what hooks claims is already implicit in Malcolm's autobiography be an effective way to depoliticize him?

I was disturbed by the Marable essay. Although hooks claims that calling Malcolm gay "creates havoc," she doesn't take the next step: clarify that homophobia and racism are overlapping systems of domination and that fighting homophobia therefore becomes necessary anti-racist work. Even if the Perry rumor is false (and it no doubt is), it nevertheless shows how effective homophobic attacks can be. The way to resist them is to fight homophobia. I would have expected an "intersectionality" theorist like hooks to have pointed that out. Instead her take-away is "we must rigorously interrogate sources of information."

The book's low points, however, are the two "dialogues" hooks has--not with herself, thankfully--but with filmmaker Gilda Sheppard about the movies Crash and Precious. For those of us who don't agree with Routledge that hooks' collection of film criticism, Real to Reel (1996), is a "classic," these dialogues are particularly painful. First, both hooks and Sheppard speak in the same jargon ("reinscribed into a plantation economy" etc.). They also speak in block quotes that sometimes run over a page in length. I hope an oxygen tank was available. At this point in her career, hooks should dialogue with someone whose politics are different than hers, so actual knowledge might be created from the friction.

These "dialogues," however, make manifest a perennial problem with hooks' writing: namely, her focus on ephemera. That dissertation on Toni Morrison never made it to a publisher; instead, hooks has dedicated her career as a cultural critic mostly to pop, trash, and sleaze, much of it instantly forgettable. You have to wonder why she is offering now, in 2013, a review of the movie Crash, which came out almost a decade ago. Although it won an Academy Award, no one talks about it. It isn't a new classic.

Almost 15 years ago Michele Wallace warned hooks that she was wasting her talents on trash; and the intervening years have definitely proven Wallace right. Since the mid-1990s, the web has grown up so that it now provides the instant pop cultural analysis of the kind hooks made her name with, thus rendering her irrelevant. Also, technological innovation (such as the rise of digital film and Netflix) has allowed new, exciting filmmakers to create work and distribute it. Perhaps now, in her twilight, hooks could use some of her remaining name recognition to bring these young artists to the public's attention instead of trashing crappy Hollywood movies no one cares about. hooks always claimed she was looking for new and better representations; maybe she can get out of the sugar shack and go find them.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback