To what does the title of this book refer? Together with Peter Mortensen, Dev Patnaik suggests at least a portion of the answer when posing several questions in the Introduction: "How can we nurture the instinct that all human beings have to walk in other people's shoes? How can we, in turn, create a wider sense of empathy to connect larger organizations to the world around them? And how can we leverage that widespread empathy to be an engine for growth and change?" It soon becomes obvious that after accumulating a wealth of real-world first-hand experience, Patnaik wrote this book to share what he observed and the lessons he learned from what he experienced.
It is unclear to me where (a) he set out to validate his faith in the power of empathy (i.e. "the ability to step outside yourself and see the world as others do") or (b) he arrived at that conclusion only after acquiring substantial empirical evidence. Either way, Patnaik asserts that that "the problem with business today is nit a lack of innovation; it's a lack of empathy." Moreover, for many of the world's greatest companies, [empathy] is an ever-present but rarely-talked about engine for growth." I agree to the extent that empathy is not defined in terms of warm and fuzzy feelings gushing out from the bleeding heart of a sappy sentimentalist.
In his book The Opposable Mind, Roger Martin explains how and why what he characterizes as "integrative thinking" can help us make much better decisions. That is, "the predisposition and the capacity to hold two [or more] diametrically opposed ideas" in one's head and then "without panicking or simply settling for one alternative or the other," be able to "produce a synthesis that is superior to either opposing idea." I think this is what Patnaik has in mind when urging his reader to "tap into the power that every one of us already has - the ability to reach outside of ourselves and connect with other people," to "see the world through the eyes of other people."
Patnaik and Mortensen carefully organize their material within three Parts. First, they makes a case for empathy (i.e. what it is...and isn't, why it is potentially so important to organizations and even countries as well as to individuals); then they explain how to create and sustain "Widespread Empathy" between and among people, whatever the nature and extent of perceived differences may be; and finally, they focus on the results of empathic values and behavior (i.e. e.g. circumspection and intelligence, social and economic impact, mutual trust and respect, increased appreciation of one's self as well as of others). Throughout the ten chapters that precede the book's conclusion, Patnaik and Mortensen demonstrate "how empathy can be a driving force to develop more prosperous, more ethical, and more enduring companies."
Then in the final chapter, they assert that empathy "also has the power to help us see how we can change for the better...Empathy can awaken us to the power that we have to change the course of everyday life. But only if we're willing to step outside of our own preconceptions and see the world through other people's eyes." To that I presume to add my own hope that others will also be willing to step outside their own preconceptions and see the world through our eyes. Perhaps all that is needed is setting a proper example. If not now, when?