FREE Delivery in the UK on orders with at least £10 of books.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Winning in Traffic Court has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Winning in Traffic Court Paperback – 3 Jan 2004

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
£3.89 £3.89
£5.51 FREE Delivery in the UK on orders with at least £10 of books. In stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Win a £5,000 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card for your child's school by voting for their favourite book. Learn more.
  • Prepare for the summer with our pick of the best selection for children (ages 0 - 12) across Amazon.co.uk.

Win a £5,000 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card and 30 Kindle E-readers for your child or pupil's school.
Vote for your child or pupil(s) favourite book(s) here to be in with a chance to win.

Product details

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 2 reviews
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Useful if you live in Florida 29 July 2008
By Giacomo Holdini - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Since this book is written by an attorney, it would seem to be self-recommending. However, the editorial review is somewhat misleading when it states, "Concepts are valid in all states, and additional information is included for those with infractions in Florida." While the broadest of the concepts Stern discusses may have universal application, they comprise less than one third of the book's meager length. The remainder of the book is devoted to practical information relative to specific types of infractions (e.g., speeding tickets, radar, etc.) - information you might hope to find in a book written by an attorney. Unfortunately, this content is written strictly according to the statutes in Florida. Evidently, Florida has very strict requirements for establishing a prima facie case in traffic infraction trials, meaning the police have to jump through a lot of procedural hoops in order to prove you guilty. Stern makes it sound as though it is relatively easy to win in court if you simply know which questions to ask to show that the state is unable to prove its case. How much his information may apply in your state will obviously vary depending on which state you are in. I live in Oregon, where our wonderfully backwards traffic laws make the vast majority of Stern's information inapplicable. Consider the following excerpts, which I contrast with my own speeding trial experience as examples of the disparity between what Stern says versus what can (although not necessarily will) actually happen in court:

"It is not enough for the officer to orally he say he completed the course [in radar training] but a Certificate of the satisfactory completion of the course must be offered and accepted into the record. Failure to do so is sufficient to move the court to dismiss the case."

This may be the law in Florida, but in states where it is not, most judges simply accept the officer's testimony that s/he has had the necessary training without further proof. Judges consider police to be officers of the court, and generally accept what they say as fact, unless you can make a good case that what they are saying is not true. This applied at my trial, where the judge didn't bat an eye at the officer's testimony regarding his own qualifications.

"The officer must testify and produce a certificate or document that the [radar] unit was tested within the previous six months of the citation issued and found to be functioning properly. [...] Since the certificate is one of the essential proofs necessary to find guilt the case is dismissible for failure of the state to make out a prima facie case."

Again, maybe in Florida, but this is hardly the case in all states. At my trial, I made a foundational objection when the officer cited his radar reading as evidence without entering a certificate of calibration into the record. The judge overruled my objection and allowed the reading into evidence without any proof whatsoever that the gun had been properly tested by a qualified professional.

"In addition to the above requirements the officer must produce a 'written log' demonstrating that specified internal and external accuracy tuning fork checks of the device were performed by the officer both before and after each citation was issued for speeding. [...] The external tuning fork accuracy check must be made with certified tuning forks (plus or minus one mile per hour) furnished by the manufacturer."

In many states and jurisdictions, officers don't even keep written logs of their radar activities, let alone are required to submit such logs in court. In my case, the officer simply noted on the back of the ticket that he had performed a calibration check, without ever writing what the process of the check was, or its outcome, other than it was "OK." At trial, his testimony alone was sufficient to convince the judge his tests were adequate, and the officer was never required to submit any written verification of his radar activity. Moreover, under questioning, the officer was unable to say which tuning fork he used, whether or not it was properly calibrated and/or certified, and whether or not it was provided by the manufacturer of the radar gun he used in issuing my citation. Again, the judge found all of this acceptable.

The above are just three examples of many from Stern's book that, if you choose to follow them and you do not live in Florida, may cause you to end up flat on your face in court. Perhaps the state where you live has more well thought-out statutes than does Oregon, and perhaps more of Stern's information will apply. The point is, though, unless you live in Florida, you cannot take what Stern says for granted. You will have to do your own checking of state laws, and if you do not find a law that closely resembles the Florida laws Stern cites, odds are his informaton will do you no good. Moreover, at 48 pages, only 36 of which contain relevant textual content, you can guess just how much in-depth information is in this book - not very much. His approach, even to the concepts that "are valid in all states," is cursory. If you are buying a lot of different books on fighting traffic tickets, just to cover your bases, then go ahead and buy this book. You might still find something useful. If you only want one, steer clear of this, unless, of course, you live in Florida.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Very helpful hints 3 April 2010
By Wildflower - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
In San Bernardino County California, specifically in the city of Rancho Cucamonga in the vicinity of Victoria Garden shopping center on Daycreek Dr. The city decided to build, I think it's called a "roundabout" in the middle a a small street partioning one shopping center's entry/exit directly accross the street of the other entry/exit of the opposite shopping center.

It gets very dark in the early evening in the middle month of December and the street lighting was dim. I wanted to cross the street to the opposite shopping center but this circular planter/roundabout, which was foreign to me, was directly in front of my path and I didn't know what to do. There was an arrow sign planted in the circular planter in front of me pointing right turn, but in looking towards that direction, it looked like a dead end street and that's not what I wanted to do. I simply wanted to cross the street to the opposite shopping area.

When I exited to go across the street, I made a quick left and then a quick right turn to enter the opposite shopping center. Lo and behold! ...a police car spot light shined on me. Needless to say I got a ticket. I was very angry and upset because I felt they could have made the street signs more "user friendly." Cirtainly, they could have designed a counter clock directional arrow sign or else, painted a directional line on the street.

After reading this book, I called the Rancho Cucamonga Street Engineering Dept. to get aerial photos of this specific location. It was then, I was told by the engineer whom I spoke to, that this planter roundabout is the only one of its kind in the entire San Bernardino County and that it was an experimentation. In addition to the photos the city engineering dept. gave me, I also went back to the location in the same hour of night of the incident armed with my camera. I took several directional photos such as N/S/E/W to include building landmarks of the site. To make a long story short; ...from this book I learned; -to be well armed is to be prepared.

Immediately after my day in court, I went directly to an office supply store and bought an unaffordably expensive printer which turned out to cost me less than the cost of the traffic ticket.

Would I recommend this book? ...No if you are court savy and are well verse with the traffic laws, or if you're a lawyer. ...HELL YES! ...DEFINETLY! ....if you're a dummy like me and want to win your case. After all, Confusius says; -I think it's him, a picture speaks more than a thousand words.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know

Look for similar items by category