or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
26 used & new from £3.99

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Why Truth Matters
 
See larger image
 

Why Truth Matters (Hardcover)

by Ophelia Benson (Author), Jeremy Stangroom (Author)
3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
RRP: £14.99
Price: £12.49 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £2.50 (17%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Only 2 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want guaranteed delivery by Wednesday, November 25? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
12 new from £6.10 13 used from £4.00 1 collectible from £3.99
12 Days of Christmas Sale in Books
Get up to 65% off some of our top titles. Shop now

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with Does God Hate Women? by Ophelia Benson

Why Truth Matters + Does God Hate Women?
Price For Both: £22.43

Show availability and delivery details

  • This item: Why Truth Matters by Ophelia Benson

    In stock.
    Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk.
    This item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions

  • Does God Hate Women? by Ophelia Benson

    In stock.
    Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk.
    This item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Does God Hate Women?

Does God Hate Women?

by Ophelia Benson
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £9.94
Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed

Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed

by Simon Blackburn
3.7 out of 5 stars (3)  £6.47
What's Left?: How Liberals Lost Their Way

What's Left?: How Liberals Lost Their Way

by Nick Cohen
4.1 out of 5 stars (33)  £6.47
How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic

How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic

by Madsen Pirie
3.6 out of 5 stars (11)  £5.98
50 Voices of Disbelief: Why We Are Atheists

50 Voices of Disbelief: Why We Are Atheists

by Russell Blackford
4.5 out of 5 stars (2)  £13.87
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 202 pages
  • Publisher: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd. (16 Feb 2006)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0826476082
  • ISBN-13: 978-0826476081
  • Product Dimensions: 19.8 x 13.6 x 2.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 312,870 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

Product Description

Product Description

A witty and eloquent debunking, grounded in solid philosophical scholarship, of the 'fashionable nonsense' that pervades modern culture and academia. Truth has always been a central preoccupation of philosophy in all its forms and traditions. However, in the late twentieth century truth became suddenly rather unfashionable. The precedence given to assorted political and ideological agendas, along with the rise of relativism, postmodernism and pseudoscience in academia, led to a decline both of truth as a serious subject, and an intellectual tradition that began with the Enlightenment. "Why Truth Matters" is a timely, incisive and entertaining look at how and why modern thought and culture lost sight of the importance of truth. It is also an eloquent and inspiring argument for restoring truth to its rightful place. Jeremy Stangroom and Ophelia Benson, editors of the successful butterfliesandwheels website - itself established to 'fight fashionable nonsense' - identify and debunk such nonsense, and the spurious claims made for it, in all its forms. Their account ranges over religious fundamentalism, Holocaust denial, the challenges of postmodernism and deconstruction, the willful misinterpretation of evolutionary biology, identity politics and wishful thinking. "Why Truth Matters" is both a rallying cry for the Enlightenment vision and an essential read for anyone who's ever been bored, frustrated, bewildered or plain enraged by the worst excesses of the fashionable intelligentsia.


About the Author

Jermey Stangroom is co-editor (with Julian Baggini) of The Philosophers' Magazine and the successful philosophy books, What Philosophy Is and Great Thinkers A-Z. He and Ophelia Benson are editors of www.butterfliesandwheels.com

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Why Truth Matters
69% buy the item featured on this page:
Why Truth Matters 3.9 out of 5 stars (7)
£12.49
Does God Hate Women?
18% buy
Does God Hate Women? 5.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£9.94
Bad Science
5% buy
Bad Science 4.5 out of 5 stars (205)
£3.57
Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed
4% buy
Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed 3.7 out of 5 stars (3)
£6.47

 

Customer Reviews

7 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.9 out of 5 stars (7 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
47 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars The false, the phoney, and the therapy, 29 Jan 2007
By Stephen A. Haines (Ottawa, Ontario Canada) - See all my reviews
(TOP 10 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   
The shocks of The Great War of 1914-1918 spawned a social movement known as "nihilism". Values once held meaningful were rejected by those who felt the conflict demonstrated such beliefs to be invalid. The Second World War may be considered the foundation for a similar movement arising in post-War France - "postmodernism". A close cousin of nihilism, the "French philosophy" strives to place all cultures on an equal footing. That equalitiy, moreover, is absolute - any declared stance must be granted equivalent respect with any other. Accompanied by many synonyms such as "cultural relativism" and "post-structuralism", the pestilence quickly spread in Western Europe where its symptoms are clearly seen in media presentations. More significantly, it became firmly established in the US, particularly in universities where it generated such programmes as "Women's [in a variety of spellings] Studies", "African Studies", all with a strong anti-Enlightenment and anti-science orientation. Benson and Stangroom here apply some vigorous therapy to counter the assault on rational thought. Although brief, this book is direct and incisive, clearly exhibiting the malaise infesting our universities and political institutions.

The purpose of this book is to re-establish that "truth" is indeed a valid concept. Postmodernism's contention that there are as many "truths" as there are tellers of it cannot be sustained. Benson and Stangroom, who founded the Website "butterfliesandwheels", explain that truth is empirically based and not a highly variant cultural phenomenon. Because our species appears to be the only one that can define truth, the authors address such fields as anthropology, evolutionary psychology, "women's ways of knowing" and various philosophies in describing how truth has been both supported and distorted.

Certain figures loom large in their presentation, Jacques Derrida, Richard Rorty and Sandra Harding, among others. The authors show how "cultural relativism" has attempted to discredit research in human behaviour with the objective of achieving "political correctness". In anthropology, for example, the episode of Napoleon Chagnon's work among the Yamomano of South America being falsely challenged raised a storm of controversy in the discipline. Although Chagnon was finally vindicated, the controversy brought suspicion on the science and besmirched Chagnon permanently. A related circumstance lies in the pronouncements of Sandra Harding that empirical evidence can have a gender bias and that a "feminist empiricism" should replace long-standing work. Harding, who still teaches at UCLA, has produced a population of graduate students who have fanned out to their own teaching posts and public affairs roles. Among other criticisms, the authors point out that even Harding admits her "philosophy" leads to a wide range of "ways of knowing". Women have indeed been excluded from science, but revising the methodologies isn't going to grant women more places at the lab bench. For all Harding's rhetoric, "E" still equals "mc2".

These examples indicate how knowledge, long and often painfully gained, can be cast aside in the name of some minority's demand for "respect". The authors make it clear that tearing down established knowledge and the methods of attaining it does not enhance or restore elements of society who feel they are victims of injustice. Part of the work of empirical research is to examine those injustices and right them. Their cause, however, isn't due to truth being false, but being misused. The fascisti mis-applied Charles Darwin's idea of "survival of the fittest", but that, the authors insist, doesn't reflect a flaw in the basic premise. The danger in not knowing how to make the distinction only results in repeating that kind of history under a new guise. Such distortions are being perpetrated in North American universities on a daily basis and carried into the public realm.

Postmodernism, the authors contend, is more than just a "philosophy". It is an assault on knowledge itself. By contriving the results of research into "tools of oppression", the postmodernists conveniently overlook not only how science works, but who is actually doing the "oppressing". Bench scientists aren't imposing social conditions resulting from their work. Science, no matter how haltingly and hesitantly, is the one means to establish what is valid. Its answers are authoritative because they can be proven correct or not. To undermine those answers through treating them as options instead of data, is simply to falsify the results. The Enlightenment began as a means of overcoming false mythologies. It's depressing to see how a new wave of such mythologies has required a re-starting of Enlightenment principles to overcome it. That long-held standard will prove the needed therapy. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]
Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars A good point of view but a frustrating read, 4 Aug 2007
By Mr. Stuart Bruce "DonQuibeats" (Cardiff, UK) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)      
This review is from: Why Truth Matters (Paperback)
Apologies in advance to academics wanting a review as thorough as Stephen A Haines' below.

This book came up on my Amazon recommended list after I read books on the subject of the modern relevance (or irrelevance) of religion, by Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Lewis Wolpert, so I gambled on it and was mostly disappointed.

I'd have to disagree with some of the other reviews and say that the readability and accessibility of this book varies from chapter to chapter. In places it is very strong, particularly when it considers 'hot topics', for example the teaching in Mormon-run American schools or the money ploughed into pro-smoking 'scientific' research.

However I found that for my un-academic tastes, too much of this book was ungrounded philosophy for academia's sake- considering a bunch of other recent books on postmodern philosophy and criticising them. It feels like part of the ongoing treadmill, in which future publications will quote and criticise "Why Truth Matters" and collectively they all keep themselves in a job without coming to any conclusions that have any real impact to the casual reader.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
28 of 48 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A Thoughtful, Well-Written Book, 17 May 2006
By Roger (Wales) - See all my reviews
Why Truth Matters is a book that deserves to reach a wide audience. It is a thoughtful book that is also accessibly written without patronising the reader.

The main thesis of the book is that the notion of Truth as an important human goal has been subject to unwarranted denigration in recent times. As the authors note, it is rare - although not unheard of - for the epistemic and/or human value of Truth and Turth-seeking to be openly confronted. More common are side comments and general attitudes that appear to draw from varying - and not necessarily consistent - prevailing strands in social and political thought. Yet these comments and attitudes are not typically underpinned intellectually to any substantial extent.

One of the main virtues of Why Truth Matters is that it does not try to over-reach itself. It does not claim to offer the full and final word on profound epistemological issues. But it does argue - very cogently - that whatever positions are taken on many of these matters, Truth remains an abiding, central human value. Living as we do in what Susan Haack once appropriately described as an 'era of preposterism', that is a valuable message
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars Exploring the concept of truth
Why Truth Matters by Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom, Continuum, 2006, 212 ff.

Exploring the concept of truth
By Howard A. Read more
Published 2 months ago by Dr. H. A. Jones

2.0 out of 5 stars More than truth
The premise of the book, that `wishful thinking and denial had replaced a rational acceptance of grim truth', is gateway to 181 pages of in-depth corrective. Read more
Published 15 months ago by SL Boyes

5.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant
Readable, informative and absorbing. A terrific defense of reason and clear thinking. Should be assigned to all students!!
Published on 28 May 2006 by Jane

5.0 out of 5 stars Sharp, witty and intelligent.
This is an excellent take down of the kind of vague mumbo jumbo pseudo-intellectual trash that is often hard to argue against, for the pure fact no-one knows what is being said! Read more
Published on 16 May 2006 by solent56

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject








i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.