Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more


or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Colour:
Image not available

 
Start reading Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design [Paperback]

Michael Shermer
3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
Price: £9.03 & FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £10. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 8 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 21 Sep.? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £7.59  
Hardcover --  
Paperback £9.03  
Audio Download, Abridged £6.20 or Free with Audible.co.uk 30-day free trial

Frequently Bought Together

Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design + The Believing Brain: From Spiritual Faiths to Political Convictions – How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths. + Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time
Price For All Three: £26.51

Buy the selected items together


Product details

  • Paperback: 224 pages
  • Publisher: Holt Rinehart and Winston; Reprint edition (24 July 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0805083065
  • ISBN-13: 978-0805083064
  • Product Dimensions: 21 x 14.6 x 1.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 83,007 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Michael Shermer founded 'Skeptic' magazine and website (www.skeptic.com) and is a contributing editor, and columnist, for 'Scientific American'. Michael Shermer frequently appears on television and radio as a scientific expert.


Customer Reviews

3.6 out of 5 stars
3.6 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
40 of 42 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Essential reading for anyone interested in ID 8 Dec 2006
Format:Hardcover
Some background. Michael Shermer writes a column in Scientific American called Skeptic. He edits a journal called The Skeptic. He used to be a believer. He once wrote a book called Why People Believe Weird Things. He knows what he is talking about.

So he rightly got annoyed when the intelligent design concept began to make ground and he decided to write this thoughtful, intelligent and well written book. It is essential reading as an introduction to the against side in the on-going debate. He is not technical, not deeply scientific or philosophical: he just outlines the salient facts.

Most people reading this book will see the passion of someone who cares deeply about the truth (his earlier book spent much time concentrating on Holocaust deniers) and why the truth matters. He does not waste time praising ID for its insights - he just shows it up for what it is: a vacuous and empty attempt at bring the Christian God back into the classroom in the USA by smuggling it in under the transparent fleece of pseudoscience. Read it for yourself and you too will see. Unless, of course, you are not a skeptic in the proper sense: your mind is made up.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
25 of 27 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Aiming at a vacant target 15 Jan 2007
By Stephen A. Haines HALL OF FAME
Format:Hardcover
A new cottage industry has arisen in the US - writing books to counter the rise of Christian anti-science in that nation. Michael Shermer has an edge on many of his colleagues in dealing with the version of "creationism" known as "Intelligent Design" - he's been one of their number. This may give him the advantage of a wider outlook, but the question remains whether it makes him more effective in countering the movement. His proposal is conciliatory, but relies on creationists accepting facts, not fantasies or ideologies. It's a difficult task, but Shermer's long experience as a sceptic of fallacious notions supports his efforts. It also provides him with a polished writing style that should convince the most obscurantist holdout.

In his Prologue, Shermer clearly targets his audience - that segment of the US population who thinks the universe is less than ten thousand years old. He portrays the demographics that refine the numbers. So much so that you feel the publisher should have packed bookstores in the American South with extra copies. The author's own epiphany - "the scales fell from my eyes" - during his university days is his justification. If it can happen to him, it can happen with other evangelicals. He uses the history of thinking about natural selection and the various arguments against it to construct a dialogue. He lists the points creationists raise, then counters them effectively. That's not terribly challenging - his "case" after all, is one contending with an empty thesis entirely lacking any supporting evidence.

Evolution is a fact, he contends, and explains the nature of how research has verified Darwin's original concept. He notes the many challenges to detailed processes of natural selection, but insists these minutiae don't refute the theory.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
In "Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design" Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, reviews succinctly both the overwhelming evidence in support of contemporary evolutionary theory and the pseudoscientific religious nonsense known as Intelligent Design, and then, discusses "the real, unsolved problems in evolution". Shermer, for example, has ample space to describe briefly Ernst Mayr's theory of allopatric speciation, and its relationship to punctuated equilibrium, the evolutionary paleontological theory developed by American invertebrate paleontologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould. But he also devotes ample space to dissecting Intelligent Design concepts like William Dembski's "Law of Conservation of Information", noting its irrelevance to both current mathematical information theory and the transfer and accretion of information - via DNA - in living biological systems. He offers an elegant overview of the origins and history of the so-called "Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate", devoting ample time to the existence of the infamous "Wedge Document" and the trial proceedings of the Kitzmiller vs. Dover trial and, of course, the harsh verdict rendered by Federal Judge John E. Jones III against both Intelligent Design and the Dover Area School District board.

Shermer's terse tome is noteworthy for several reasons.
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
4.0 out of 5 stars Evolution is not Darwin, and vice versa 12 April 2011
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
There are a range of books from both science and from creation(isms) explaining their position and what is really required is a book that tries to speak beyond the converted as it were. In this goal Shermer's is as good as any although Kenneth R. Miller's position as a noted biologist, debunker of intelligent design and a person of faith positions him in prime real intellectual real estate in being able to really get people thinking and re-thinking about the issues of design, meaning and purpose.

I bought the book and it was good value. A criticism I have with Shermer is that along with a lot of evolutionary minded thinkers situational, contingent (and especially regarding humans) cultural factors are underplayed in the assertion that evolution is the process that can provide the dominant narrative for all life, including human life. Since 1859 there has been no accepted theory of culture from the evolutionary presective despite 10+ schools trying to generate such a theory of the social world of humankind. While this remains the case humans (in a very real sense) will be beyond the complete grip of the evolutionary model. Evolutionary theorists Boyd & Richerson have said that a failure for evolutionary theory to account for culture would undermine the entire Darwinian revolution. I think this is a gross over-exaggeration. The theory of evolution is the telling theory of biological and botanical evolution in the nature setting. Darwin noted several times that natural selection was much diminished in civilised societies but evolutionary theorists are quite defensive at the notion that evolutionary theory (strong in the nature setting) is another partial theory of the social world of humankind.
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Look for similar items by category


Feedback