I would be interested to know from the reviewer above which 'experts' have dismissed this book as 'propaganda'?
The author, Neill Lochery, is one of the most respected experts in this field working for a leading London university. To make such a simplistic comment as 'this is Israeli propaganda' underlines the very reason why this book is so necessary - to redress the balance of information available on this conflict.
Israel is persistently portrayed as an unprovoked aggressor in this conflict, a view the world at large seems happy to go along with. Lochery makes the, seemingly, unwelcome assertion that it is perhaps the way in which the conflict is reported that creates this impression. He suggests that often biased reportage has created a distorted view of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
He illustrates his argument with well-research episodes where the facts have been misrepresented by the media to emphasis Israel violence whilst portraying Palestine as an innocent. Lochery reminds us that there are two sides to this self-perpetuating cycle of violence and retribution in which neither side is free of blame.
No one can state with any authority what the truth of the matter is. However, both sides have a right to have their voices heard. It is up to the informed reader to make up his mind. And you cannot consider yourself informed if your mind is closed to what you do not want to hear. You cannot dismiss a book as bad just because it does not echo your own opinions.