have greatly enjoyed reading and no doubt I will re-read again and again as it is so entertaining; it was a pleasure to read and I was particularly impressed with the way all of the images were integrated into the text. The Timeline is excellent in my opinion, both in its layout and content; the Letters themselves have obviously been expertly edited, are very interesting; you really start to fully understand the man himself from his lengthy correspondence. The late David Blow's R.S. Memoir of Max Perutz (albeit incomplete) is very good in my opinion, and makes for an excellent start to the book; I would have preferred to have been able to read the complete memoir, ie unedited.
I am sorry to say that the decision to exclude (quote) "the correspondence on the controversy that broke out over Jim Watson's revelation in The Double Helix that my father had shown Francis Crick a Medical Research Council report on the work of Rosalind Franklin" is fundamentally wrong, and the omission of it does 'spoil' the book. The editor having 'shot herself in the foot' goes on to try to support this odd decision with "The grounds for exclusion are that the lengthy and repetitive correspondence will now be published on the web and that it has had a considerable airing in a number of books." This argument simply does not convince me at all to justify their exclusion; given say the choice between all of the pages devoted to the "Habbakuk Project" (pp 123/124, quote "told...a number of times"), I would have preferred to read the above.
I would like to think that the very best discussion of this issue is Bob Olby's "Francis Crick: Hunter of Life's Secrets" in Chapter 9, pp 161/Chapter 10, pp 191/192; what a pity that Vivien Perutz when she wrote the Preface in July 2008, could not have 'predicted' this new scientific biography, due to be published on the 1st. of September!