87.5% of this book is well worth the read, but it is let down by the chapter on wrong doing and accountability where it slides into editorialising on some key points. This is frustrating because the book manages to present clearly, concisely if partially, big arguments and debunk several persistent demi-truths. It attempts and largely succeeds in being even handed and it is certainly thought provoking. It also generates a reasonable reading list from its citations and does not try to bury the reader in a welter of academic referencing. All round well worth engaging with but maybe a little more application of the "scepticism, rigour, respect for reason and evidence" it calls for on page 1 in its editing.