Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A reasonable introduction with weak worked examples, 30 Oct 2003
This review is from: What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development (Paperback)
At first I was pleased with this Book, but as I progressed through the Chapters I got progressively more disappointed. In conclusion, I think the comments on the back page say it all "provides a good grounding" - I'd rate it 'average to good' - but certainly not 'excellent'. What lets it down are the pitiful worked examples. They are key to explaining the concepts, but the choices are terrible. They focus on Inventory Control, but I wonder if the author has ever done any real analysis in this arena? In Chapter 4 a few examples are introduced, that reappear throughout the book, for example : (a) "Suppliers S1 and S4 are always in the same City" - and this is reaffirmed as 'being not all unrealistic' (b) "Suppliers in Athens can move only to London or Paris" (c) "Average shipment quantities never decrease" but in my 25 years experience in systems design I could never imagine these rules as being acceptable in their own right, never mind as 'classics' to be used in training/education? When one finds poor examples like this, it always make me wonder whether there's other topics in the book that in my naivety I am accepting hook, line & sinker, and others readers more familiar than me would similarly find to be in error? I suppose I'll never know. So I still need to read further about the topic in case I've been misinformed; so if you're going to buy one book about business rules - then this isn't the one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Just The Essence: A good brief read, 11 Feb 2004
This review is from: What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development (Paperback)
With this short, mostly non-technical, book Date tries to show that the essence of the business rules approach is that of "declarativeness". He also strives to uncover many of the shortcomings of current SQL products and shows that the business rules approach is no more than an evolutionary step in terms of fully harnessing the potential of the relational model. The writing style is not that of Date's best, but the book is mainly meant to be non-technical and brief. The important thing is the message the book is trying to deliver. The book is by no means a thorough treatment of the subject and it is not meant to be so.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
30 of 34 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not revolutionary, not new, not a book---but praised as such, 15 May 2000
By Hans Argenton - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development (Paperback)
Chris Date wrote this book to explain "what this new technology called business rules is all about". In fact, this book is not a book---it is the augmented script of a live presentation printed in big letters---, and the technology is not new: It is declarative programming for data repositories. Nevertheless, Date aims at the widest possible audience, and so this manager's guide (as he calls it) would be a good thing were it not so absolutely black-and-white painted: Procedural code is bad, declarative code is good---being true, this is not new and not without its own problems. Rules are certainly a very good idea for data-centered business applications with the traditional short transactions and hence short and isolated operations on that data; however, with an increasing number of rules, their semantics as a whole becomes more and more difficult, and for recursive rules with negation, you have to choose the one you like from several possibilities. So, even declarative semantics can be very hard to understand. There is a saying from the field of knowledge-engineering: "Rules are the assembly language of AI". And that's exactly why I am so critical of that book (and give it two stars only): It makes the impression that 2 to 4 simple If-then rules are enough to capture the semantics of complex business applications. Furthermore, Date states that he is actually talking about system development! Remember the Prolog logic programing language? Not quite declarative and yet good mainly for rapid prototyping. I admire Date's Relational Database Writings and his Introduction to Database Systems very much---each earns 5 stars in my opinion---; so I am the more disappointed that he published such a booklet, which is much too simplistic in its reasoning. We had declarative programming and deductive databases 10 years ago; unfortunately, they did not prevail. Maybe, this is Chris Date's way to give these ideas a new chance.
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Yes, I agree. Now what?, 5 April 2001
By Robert Barnes - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development (Paperback)
In this short (about 120 pages) book, Date makes a persuasive case that the future of programming is in rule-based programming. If, instead of writing procedural code, we simply described the business rules of our data model and the development system then determined when to apply the rules, and how to do so efficiently, we could achieve an order-of-magnitude increase in development productivity. I enjoyed reading this book (it didn't take long), but I found myself thinking "Yes, I agree totally, now what?" I am not sure who the book is aimed at. Is it aimed at software vendors such as IBM, Oracle, and Microsoft, to suggest the kind of tools that they should be offering the rest of us, or is it aimed at people like me, involved in developing systems within a typical commercial environment? If the latter, then beyond emphasizing that we should strive to put as much as possible in our data model (for example, creating a view instead of accessing a base table filtered by a WHERE clause), it's not clear what we should do to follow Date's advice. How should my development practices change as a result of reading this book? I don't know.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Inadequate new value for the reader., 28 Nov 2001
By Larry R - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: What Not How: The Business Rules Approach to Application Development (Paperback)
To me the content of this book is not more than I would expect in a magazine article or something from an op-ed page. As with anything from Chris Date, it seems to mostly be pointing out how miserably the "relational" database vendors have implemented the One True relational model introduced by Codd and championed by Date. Beyond that, it makes the point that "business rules", the semantic layer typically bolted ad hoc onto a "relational" database with triggers and "application" layers, are better enforced as some sort of constraints expressed as part of a more formal "data model" of the database. Beyond that the book does not seem to say much, and I do not see that it offers the reader anything more than opinions. I personally agree that "relational" databases like Oracle, DB2, SQLServer, PostgreSQL, etc., do not really provide a "relational" database in the sense that Chris Date thinks of "relational", and I agree that it would be better to shift some "business rule" enforcement towards the database. But I do not think these things are likely to happen as described in this book anytime soon, and in any case I do not think this book offers anything to current or future users of any databases which is not offered much better by other books.
|
|
|