Don't be fooled by the title and outline. While being sold as a biography, this book's place is in "tabloid investigative report"/"war crimes" category.
It is not a biography of Wernher von Braun "per se", neither is it the history of rocket development under his supervision. Rather it is a highly emotional attempt to prove that:
1) Wernher von Braun was a war criminal
2) he should have been put under trial, sentenced and serve the sentence
3) United States did wrong by bringing him in and using his skills and genius for US rocket program Period
The book presumably covers 30 years span from 1945 (von Braun arrival to US) to 1975 (his death). The developments of rocketry in this era are only a background for the author and never paid any serious attention. Mr. Pinzkiewicz 's real interest and effort are invested into collecting and presenting accusations against von Braun Nazi past in chronological order. The technical details of particular important developments of principal space programs are scarce, while "dirty clothes" and cover-up theories are inspected at length and with great interest.
The whole story of Moonship project from 1960 President Eisenhower directive to Apollo 11 landing in 1969 is covered in 9 pages(!). Wernher von Braun's one-time interchange with a French newspaper concerning his Nazi past takes 3 pages. Compare - 9 years of hard and complex work in 9 pages. Several days and several letters - 3 pages.
Even so - Mr. Pinzkiewicz seems never be able to get to any kind of consistent statement- either PRO or CONS. He never has the bravery to say "Wernher von Braun IS beyond reasonable doubt a war criminal based on this, this and that". Instead we have tabloid quality book - gossips, partial quotes, twisted interpretations - enough to plant a seed of doubt, but not substantial enough to be accused of a lie.
It is truly remarkable that in the whole book not a SINGLE document is ever quoted in full - a must for an investigative report, even trashy one.
Wernher von Braun was not an angel. His most productive years were during a cruel and controversial period of our history. If Mr. Pinzkiewicz tried to show this person as a ruthless, blood-thirsty, dishonest and manipulative individual with selfish agenda, then he fails miserably to convince me.
As I stated in the very beginning, perhaps not so bad in the category of "tabloid investigative report", but has little merit for anything else.