When was the last time you saw a documentary that told you something you didn't already know?
Or that honestly made you think about an issue in a way you hadn't before?
Would you like to see such a film?
If so, then "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" is for you.
Of course, this series of three interrelated one hour programs isn't really a "documentary" at all as the term would usually be understood. It doesn't just pick what we would all automatically accept as a readily definable subject and then attempt to give us an impartial overview. Rather, this series would be far better described as a kind of video essay. It ranges over what would normally be viewed as widely disparate phenomena, unifying them via themes - indeed, we might even say theories - that emerge almost as a mosaic as successive phenomena are scrutinised through the film-maker's lens.
In the first episode, the life and philosophy of Ayn Rand are examined in parallel with the counter-culture of the 1960s, the utopian vision of the early computer pioneers, and the course of the American economy and body politic under the stewardship of Allan Greenspan and Bill Clinton.
In the second episode, cybernetic models of ecosystems, and in particular the idea that such ecosystems tend towards a stable equilibrium, are critiqued alongside the application of such ideas to human societies.
In the final episode,
The Selfish Gene idea popularised by Richard Dawkins is examined side by side with the Rwandan massacres so familiar to us all from decades of tragic news broadcasts from the former Belgian Congo. For those who are sensitive to such things, I should warn you that this episode does include one rather brutal shot of a dead baby obviously killed in just such a massacre.
If these episodes have a single unifying theme, it is the rejection of purely rational, machine models of nature, and of human nature and human affairs in particular. In many ways the series can be viewed as the direct spiritual descendent of the cult 1960s French sci-fi film
Alphaville.
Cinematic allusions aside, the present work is at its most emphatic in its rejection of the idea that we can somehow dispense with traditional moral philosophy and traditional politics; especially when this idea finds expression in the view that that we are all best off when government is simply done away with and individuals are left entirely to their own devices. It is important to stress that this idea is rejected with equal fervour irrespective of whether it is found emanating from the left or the right. The anarchist communes of the hippies and the deregulated markets of the economic rationalists both come in for equally harsh criticism.
Finally, although of course it's hardly the main point of the work, it is worth mentioning that this is a series with rather eclectic and exciting selections of title and background music.
As for myself, I would like to add one closing remark:
I give this series five stars because it is, I believe, a genuinely thoughtful and interesting piece of work. That doesn't necessarily mean that I completely agree with everything the film-maker had to say. I don't. And if only because of the sheer breadth of material covered, I'm guessing that most of you won't either. But boy, it's a film made by someone who's really thought about things and who truly has something to say for himself.
How many documentaries have you seen in your life that you could honestly say that about?
Theo.