There's been a lot of press coverage and corresponding expectations connected to this book. I read a bit in both the Irish News and Belfast Telegraph and Tim Pat Coogan's review in the latter paper and what nobody seems to have done is write an expectation-free account of what the reader actually gets, so I'll try to do that here.
The first half of the book is devoted to material from interviews with the late IRA member Brendan Hughes and the second part to similar material from interviews with the late UVF member and later PUP politician David Ervine, both against a backdrop of Maloney's commentary which to his credit effectively gives the historical background without detracting from the voice of either protagonist.
Hughes' account provides graphic memories of growing up in sectarian inner-city Belfast with an abundance of telling detail. He provides wonderful details of the early provisionals in Belfast and detailed accounts of his own paramilitary activity. His accounts of Adams' involvement in the IRA confirm what everybody in N.Ireland already knows (and which Adams apparently doesn't admit for "legal" reasons). There are fascinating revelations on the people "disappeared" by the IRA where the story of Jean McConville is somehow outdone in terms of poignancy by that of Patrick Crawford: abandoned by his mother as a newborn, brought up in care and probably subjected to abuse, and then killed in prison at 22 by the IRA in a death dressed up as suicide. This section includes allegations of Adams having his own "personal squad" (Moloney) or "flying column" (Hughes). Hughes' narrative also gives a fascinating account of his escape from jail, inside details of divisions within the IRA and in-depth accounts of the hunger strikes and all that led up to them.
Hughes' narrative overshadows that of Ervine and this is at least partly due to Ervine's refusal to talk about his own paramilitary activity. What he does talk about is what led him into the UVF and he provides a fascinating account of growing up in East Belfast with a conformist mother and an intellectually curious father without formal education (but with the strength of character to tell a patronising Paisley where to get off). Ervine's critical exploration of the complexities and contradictions of Irish history should serve as a shining example to people of all persuasions to go beyond the ignorance and simplistic prejudices which even now sadly prevail in N.Ireland. He provides a brutally honest (UVF) perspective on sectarian killings and bombings including the massacre at Dublin and Monaghan, gives a clear (if well-known) loyalist perspective on Paisley and offers fascinating insights into protestant working-class consciousness and class antagonisms within the unionist camp. He has strong views on Billy Wright and gives a lot of inside detail on the complex maneuverings of the peace process.
In short, the two voices in this book have much of interest to say and it is encouraging that for all the strength of convictions of both Hughes and Ervine, both men show the intelligence and humanity to transcend sectarianism.