On the one hand I disliked the structure of this book. I wasn't interested, I confess, in the history of vampire lore and movies, I just wanted to know about the real Vlad. It took a while to get there and even then the structure was thematic so it remained problematic getting a thorough chronology. There are certainly things I still don't know, such as wives'/concubines' names and so on, but I found the review of the evidence interesting and useful and the wider historical context invaluable. The coverage of his military campaigning was good. The review of his nature was a surprise: the book had been very positive until that point.I suppose it is difficult to categorise him in terms of his psychosis and behaviour and I didn't find this section helpful. As for the theories as to how to impale ergonomically I came away not much the wiser, but I did come away with the strong impression that Vlad's crimes were exaggerated - aren't they always? No doubt the regular cross-references to Richard III were intended to imply this as well. I enjoyed it and found it more useful than not on balance.