Il Farnace is one of Vivaldi's last operas and undoubtedly one of the three or four towering masterpieces he wrote in that genre. It is, therefore, very surprising that it has been recorded so seldom and none of those recordings, including the one under discussion, has fully been of a musical stature that the work merits. Of the two previous recordings, the one first released by Jordi Savall and then, for some mysterious reason, chosen to be repackaged by Naïve in their very reputable Vivaldi series, is a tawdry modernization that cannot be taken seriously by anyone interested in baroque opera. The other, done in Graz and almost impossible to find, is a thoroughly respectable rendition of the 1731 version of the opera; buy it if you can find it, and you will have a well sung and historically correct interpretation of undoubtedly the most beautiful version Vivaldi's masterpiece, but little more. Everyone does a good job, but you won't be swept away either by the singing or what it tells you about Vivaldi.
This newest recording, however, is both ravishing and problematic. Mr. Cencic has most likely the most beautiful voice of any counter tenor that has been recorded. Just hearing his voice alone is worth the price of the disc. The rest of the cast is also very, very good. The interpretation is more or less within the bounds of a historically correct rendition of an early XVIII century Venetian opera. So much for this disc's good points.
The disc's problematic areas are not so serious as to ruin your enjoyment, but they should be taken into consideration: For some bizarre reason, the producers of this disc chose Vivaldi's 1739 version, which, since the manuscript is incomplete, had to be supplemented by borrowings from other versions. More serious than the lacunae, however, is that the revisions that Vivaldi made for the 1739 version hardly improved the work. Perversely, Vivaldi removed one of the most beautiful arias of the 1731 version, "Gelido in ogni vena." Luckily, the producers of the disc saw fit to include it in an appendix at the end of the opera, so we get to hear Mr. Cencic's exquisite rendition of the aria. But it would have been better had we been able to have heard it as part of the opera itself.
My other criticism is that Mr. Fasolis and even Mr. Cencic miss no opportunity to insert baroque ornamentation, much of which reaches the limits of what could be considered good taste. There is a tendency to use the opera as a vehicle for amazing technical bravura instead of exploring the beauties of Vivaldi's music itself. But on the other hand, such excesses were also a part of XVIII century Venetian opera.