Run on Windows 7
Processor i7 3.2GHz
12GB RAM
Twin 1GB ATI Radeon HD5870
All setings on FSX racked up to Maximum.
Although many airports are much more faithfully reproduced, I don't consider the terrain to be really THAT much superior to the FSX across the board.
Living in Bristol it would be nice to see the world famous Clifton Suspension Bridge, not what appears to be a lump of soil over the Avon Gorge. On many bridges it IS still possible to fly underneath, as long as you ignore water "coming up to" the bridge on the approach. But doing this is not what this programme is about, and it certainly increases the "load time" of the flight, without in my opinion increasing the detail to the extent that the expenditure is fully justified, some areas of the country are much better, some are not really that much different. One example is the approach to Bristol airport, this looks like it's perched on a sort of cliff in the middle of the countryside, not just on a hill. It's not a waste of money, but don't expect too much.