Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Uses of Argument
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Uses of Argument [Paperback]

Stephen Edelston Toulmin
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover £58.90  
Paperback £18.04  
Paperback, 1 Jan 1958 --  
Unknown Binding --  
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details.
There is a newer edition of this item:
The Uses of Argument The Uses of Argument 5.0 out of 5 stars (1)
£18.04
In stock.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product details

  • Paperback: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press (1 Jan 1958)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0521092302
  • ISBN-13: 978-0521092302
  • Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.2 x 1.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,246,249 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

'An interesting and provocative discussion of the philosophical issues about the nature of logic.' Nature

'A book designed to awaken philosophers out of a nightmare - the nightmare brought on by an over-rich banquet upon logico-mathematical ideals.' The Humanist

Product Description

Traditionally, logic has been claimed to be 'the science of rational argument', but the relevance to our everyday disputes of the formal logician's results has remained unclear. The abstract character of traditional logic cuts the subject off from practical considerations; Mr Toulmin enquires why this is so, and shows how an alternative conception can be of more general value. Starting from an examination of the actual procedures in different fields of argument - the practice, as opposed to the theory, of logic - he discloses a richer variety than is allowed for by any available system. He argues that jurisprudence rather than mathematics should be the logician's model in analysing rational procedures, and that logic should be a comparative and not a purely formal study. These suggestions lead to conclusions which many will consider controversial; though they will also be widely recognized as interesting and illuminating. This book extends into general philosophy lines of enquiry already sketched by Mr Toulmin in his earlier books on ethics and the philosophy of science. The ordinary reader will find in it the same clarity and intelligibility; and the professional philosopher will acknowledge the same power to break new ground (and circumvent old difficulties) by posing fresh and stimulating questions.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
A man who makes an assertion puts forward a claim-a claim on our attention and to our belief. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
(2)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

1 Review
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
5.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A very insightful read, 17 July 2007
By 
C. Bergenholtz (Aarhus, Denmark) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Uses of Argument (Paperback)
This is a fantastic book. I am a philosophy graduate and ph.d. student - to my knowledge this is the best book on arguing and reasoning ever written. The book is thus worth reading for several purposes; if you just want to be better at understanding and providing arguments in life in general, or if you are a student and want to write better essays and papers. It provides practical examples, and a model for understanding arguments. The model is simple and straightforward, simply because it accurately describes what a good argument is in the western world.

Toulmin critizes the analytical tradition. As Toulmin says, there are very few genuinely pure analytical arguments in real life; it is much more messy. The analytical standard (pure logic) is thus often meaningless. An analytical based doubt does not necessarily make sense. As Aristotle once wrote (could have been Toulmins words):

...it is a mark of the trained mind never to expect more precision in the treatment of any subject than the nature of that subject permits; for demanding logical demonstrations from a teacher of rhetoric is clearly about as reasonable as accepting mere plausibility from a mathematician...

The basic relevant terms (when it comes to arguments and reasoning), according to Toulmin are: Claims, qualifiers, warrants, backing and rebuttal. You make CLAIMS based on DATA that involve some kind of QUALIFER (always, sometimes, hardly etc.), but in order to be credible you have to be able to provide WARRANTS for your claim. And you might have to provide BACKING for your warrant. For instance: Peter is born on the Faroe Islands (data). Since a person born there is usually is a danish citizen given the danish laws (warrant), then, presumably (qualifier), unless his parents are foreigners or Peter has changed citizenship (rebuttals), Peter will be a danish citizen (claim / conclusion). Thus, the claim can be questioned both by questioning the data or the warrant.

Another interesting example relates to the term "can not". Toulmin shows that it can mean so many different things: a) You can not lift this object, it is too heavy. b) You can not talk about a fox's tail, it is a linguistic error. c) You can not refer to a male sister, it does not make sense. d) You can not smoke in here, it is forbidden. e) You can not just turn your back on your son, it is morally wrong. f) You can not calculate the exact square root of 2, it is mathematically impossible. g) You can not ask for the weight of fire, it is a conceptual contradiction. The "can nots" refer to many different things. For instance, you actually could smoke where it is forbidden, while you never could provide the square root of two. The criteria are thus very different, from context to context.

I could provie quite a few further interesting analysis and examples fromt he book. My claim would be that a regular student could improve him/herself one grade by reading and understanding this book.

PS: Toulmin thus explains the following problem, that is stated in Lewis Caroll's "What the Tortoise said to Achilles":

The Tortoise says:
(A) Things that are equal to the same are equal to each other.
(B) The two sides of this triangle are things that are equal to the same.
(C) If A and B are true, Z must be true.
(Z) The two sides of this Triangle are equal to each other.
"You should call it D, not Z," said Achilles. "It comes next to the other three. If you accept A and B and C, you must accept Z."
"And why must I?"
"Because it follows logically from them. If A and B and C are true, Z must be true. You don't dispute that, I imagine?"
"If A and B and C are true, Z must be true," the Tortoise thoughtfully repeated. "That's another hypothetical, isn't it? And, if I failed to see its truth, I might accept A and B and C, and still not accept Z, mightn't I?
"You might," the candid hero admitted...(1895)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.8 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)

40 of 43 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A classic--in argument, rhetoric, and philosophy, 29 April 2005
By Dr. Steven M. Weiss - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Uses of Argument (Paperback)
Stephen Toulmin's The Uses of Argument distinguishes itself as a work of importance in three different yet related fields. As philosophy it offers a compelling critique of analytic methods for looking at arguments, showing the limitations of a philosophical system that excludes discussion of ethical and practical issues. As rhetorical theory it was, along with Perelman's New Rhetoric, to reinvigorate Aristotle's topics within philosophical and practical argument. As argumentation theory, it models and maps arguments, providing a basic vocabulary for establishing claims, in terms of "warrants," "grounds," and "backing."

Toulmin is a gifted and engaging writer. He often lays out a concept in incomplete form, though, making one wonder exactly what he meant. You have to look at other things he's written much later to see a fuller exposition of an idea that is tantalizing in its original instance. He, for example, discusses "argument field" in Uses of Argument, but provides little explication of the term. You have to read his much later Human Understanding to begin to get a fuller picture of the idea.

Toulmin has often changed directions intellectually, so his work might not universally appeal to someone interested in argument or rhetoric. Nevertheless, his knowledge and writing style make him a consistently entertaining philosophical showman, much in the tradition of Bertrand Russell. He has also written one of the best books ever about Wittgenstein.

He has made significant contributions to epistemology and the philosophy of science.

15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Reasoning for Everyman--Beyond Aristotle and Mills, 8 Feb 2008
By C. J. Clavadetscher "quickshot carl" - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Uses of Argument (Paperback)
Toulmin presents a highly utilitarian approach to the construction of real arguments for real people. This is not Copi's classic formal logic text. This is applied reasoning, as timely now as when authored. [A current standard body effort to establish reasoning templates for computer software assurance cases relies heavily on Toulmin.] No syllogisms, epicheiremes, sorites. Merely a rock solid easily understood and easily and effectively applied two-part six element structure for making arguments that optimize the case. Worth every penny. A true classic.

42 of 50 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Brillant book, giving new insights on our use of reason, 25 Oct 1999
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Uses of Argument (Paperback)
It is a book you won't forget. Far from being boring or too technical, it is filled with examples, often funny, that help you to understand better the way our reasoning works. The classical categories are here related to our daily use of reason and the 'human face' of logic is brillantly presented.
 Go to Amazon.com to see all 4 reviews  4.8 out of 5 stars 
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback