Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Unwilling Germans?: The Goldhagen Debate
  
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Unwilling Germans?: The Goldhagen Debate [Hardcover]

Robert R. Shandley , Jeremiah Riemer
3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details.

Product details

  • Hardcover: 224 pages
  • Publisher: University of Minnesota Press (1 Jun 1998)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 081663100X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0816631001
  • Product Dimensions: 24.1 x 16.5 x 2.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 5,268,670 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Product Description

Synopsis

Daniel Johah Goldhagen's "Hitler's Willing Executioners" argued that Germans committed the unthinkable acts of the Holocaust not because they were forced to but out of the conviction that killing Jews was morally just. This work traces the intense and varied reception of his book.

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more


Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
By A Customer
Format:Paperback
This book collects some thirty essays and other materials on Daniel Goldhagen's controversial 1996 book, "Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust." Not every piece the reader might want to find is included here, but more than enough is presented to familiarize the reader with the chief objections to Goldhagen's theses raised by scholars and journalists, as well as the lines of defense offered by his supporters and Goldhagen himself. Although inherently somewhat repetitive, this book would prove rewarding to anyone interested enough in this arcane realm of Holocaust studies to be reading this review.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Unique perspective 13 Nov 1998
By A Customer
Format:Hardcover
I thought it was an extremely well written and researched debate. I liked Robert's perspective in the introduction the best. I've made the book a required reading for my class. Bravo on the unique perspective of one of the most controversail periods in World History.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
By A Customer
Format:Hardcover
The subtitle of this collection of articles is misleading. It's not a representation of the Goldhagen debate in Germany, but a thinly disguised apologia of Goldhagen's book "Hitler's Willing Executioners". First, a number of critical reviews of Goldhagen's work that have appeared in other German newspapers than the weekly DIE ZEIT are ignored or have been deliberately omitted. For example, the historian Hannes Heer wrote a piece for the daily 'die taz' titled "The Great Tautology" that pretty much trashed Goldhagen's book. Second, and more disturbing, several well-argued and balanced appraisals of "Hitler's Willing Executioners", that appeared in scholarly journals in time for a possible inclusion in this volume, are conspicuously absent. The reviews by Juergen Matthaeus in "Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte", Reinhard Ruerup in "Neue Politische Literatur", and Dieter Pohl in "Vierteljahreshefte fuer Zeitgeschichte" give Goldhagen credit where credit is due, but they also reveal repeated inconsistencies, undocumented assertions, and a selective reading of the primary sources and secondary literature. In all, this edition is a disappointment. For an overview of the Goldhagen debate it relies too heavily on statements by non-specialists and brief articles from a narrow range of newspapers.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!

Create a Listmania! list

Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback