or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime free trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn more
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
or
Get a £5.10 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card
Unto Others: Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Unto Others: Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior [Paperback]

Elliott Sober
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
RRP: £20.95
Price: £20.15 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £0.80 (4%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.
Only 4 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want guaranteed delivery by Thursday, June 7? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback £20.15  
Trade In this Item for up to £5.10
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Unto Others: Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £5.10, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.


Product details

  • Paperback: 406 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press; New edition edition (8 Sep 1999)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0674930479
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674930476
  • Product Dimensions: 22.9 x 15.2 x 2.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 717,126 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

Do people help others because they think they will get pleasure from doing so (hedonism), or because they have an ultimate desire to help another (true altruism)? Sober and Wilson argue that evolutionary biology can shed light on this problem. They do not say that human traits that evolved by individual selection are hedonistic and those that evolved by group selection are truly altruistic. Their argument is more subtle than that...[This book] will stimulate thought about important questions. -- John Maynard Smith Nature Unto Others, a collaboration between Elliott Sober, one of the founders of the modern philosophy of biology, and David Sloan Wilson, one of the most creative theoreticians in evolutionary studies, wades into this turbulent stream [of evolutionary biology ideology] at precisely the point where so many other adventurers have been swept away: the problem of the origin of altruistic behavior...At first sight Unto Others appears to be a reformulation of the now orthodox view of the evolution of altruism. It is, however, a great deal more subversive than that, for, if its alternative scheme is taken seriously, evolutionary biologists should stop characterizing the process as one in which genes drive organisms to develop particular characteristics that maximize their fitness...Unto Others is precisely that combination of radical reexamination of a system of explanation, an examination from the roots, with a rigorous technical analysis of both biological and epistemological questions that we all are supposed to engage in. What marks off their intellectual production is not its ideology but the seriousness with which they have taken the intellectual project. The hinge of Sober and Wilson's argument is a rejection of the prejudice that natural selection must operate directly solely on individuals. They point out that groups of organisms may also be the units of differential reproduction...A large part of Unto Others is taken up with a classic problem in philosophy and psychology that is analogous to the evolutionary question of whether the appearance of altruism at the individual level is really selfishness at the genic level. Is human altruism really egoism, or even pure hedonism, in disguise?...In the end, Sober and Wilson are entirely forthright in saying that they have consciously adopted a pluralistic perspective. -- R. C. Lewontin New York Review of Books Elliott Sober and David Sloan Wilson are clear that there are two notions of altruism, as well as two challenges to its possibility, stemming from quite different sources, but their wide-ranging book is intended to tackle both. They begin with biological altruism, offering their own perspective on how this puzzle should be resolved, and discussing the ways in which natural selection of social structures may have figured in the history of our species. In the second half of Unto Others, they turn to psychological altruism, arguing that debates between those who believe that human beings are sometimes other-directed and their sceptical opponents cannot be settled either by philosophical arguments or by psychological experiments... Sober and Wilson offer a distinctive approach to the problem of biological altruism, one that attempts to incorporate the accepted solutions within a unified theory. For two decades, Sober, an internationally prominent philosopher of biology, has provided welcome clarification of the concept of natural selection, while, for an even longer period, Wilson, a well-known theoretical biologist, has campaigned to rehabilitate one of the most vilified views about the nature of selection...[In this book] they have considerably clarified what is at stake in the debate about psychological altruism, and have demonstrated how an evolutionary perspective might bear on it. -- Philip Kitcher London Review of Books Unselfish action is a hallmark of humanity. We may sacrifice our lives for the good of our children, for the good of our nation, and sometimes even for the good of a stranger. What motivates such altruistic acts? To a biologist, this question has two very different answers. There is the proximate answer that explains our psychological reasons for acting altruistically, and there is the ultimate answer that explains how an unselfish act increases our Darwinian fitness relative to some selfish alternative. Through the two more-or-less independent sections of Unto Others, Sober and Wilson discuss both proximate and ultimate explanations. They use both sections to also emphasize their belief in the value of pluralistic hypotheses, with natural selection driven by multiple levels of causation and behavior driven by multiple desires... Sober and Wilson...have the laudable goal of stimulating research into levels of selection and motivation as applied to humans and their culture. -- Leonard Nunney Science [A] tour de force about the multitrack selection processes that have shaped life's creatures, including human behaviour, that dispels once and for all that peculiarly mystifying belief among gene selectionists that 'group selection' is risible and unworthy of intellectual consideration... Sober and D. S. Wilson are two of the leading thinkers in evolutionary biology who have made group selection respectable again and rescued altruism and many other supposedly counter-intuitive behavioural traits, from that contortionist potpourri of selfish-genery, inclusive fitness theory and game theory...[Unto Others] is a step in the right direction towards a truly new Darwinism. -- Gabby Dover Times Higher Education Supplement Unto Others is an important, original, and well-written book. It contains the definitive contemporary statement on higher-level selection and the evolutionary origin of cooperation. -- E. O. Wilson This provocative, important book outlines an evolutionary theory of altruism, examining past theoretical problems--in particular, how to distinguish altruism and selfish (or hedonistic) motives. Drawing deeply and judiciously on research in theoretical biology, social psychology, philosophy, and anthropology, Sober and Wilson--both long-standing and eminent participants in controversies about the evolution of altruism--make two major claims: first, that 'natural selection is unlikely to have given us purely egoistic motives,' second, that the much-maligned concept of group selection--the idea that natural selection sometimes operates at the level of the group--may be a mechanism for the evolution of ultruism...Readers will be impressed by the breadth of the analysis and, especially, the extraordinary clarity of the presentation. This will most likely be regarded as a landmark, if controversial, work. It is a testament to the authors' understanding and skill as writers that it is also fun to read. -- R. R. Cornelius Choice Unto Others, written by two eminent scholars, a philosopher (Elliott Sober) and a biologist (David Wilson) who have thought long and hard about unselfish cooperative behavior and group selection, is bound to have a long-lasting and strong influence on the field of evolutionary biology...In this book, philosophical and biological discourse are tightly woven together into an easy-to-read package. The major appeal of this book to those interested in he comparative and evolutionary study of behavior centers on the broad range of material that Sober and Wilson consider in arguing for group selection...All in all, Unto Others is a good read...I'm sure all readers will come away from this stimulating book having learned a lot and having had their own views challenged by this thoughtful and very timely essay. -- Marc Bekoff Ethology

Product Description

No matter what we do, however kind or generous our deeds may seen, a hidden motive of selfishness lurks - or so science has claimed for years. This book tells readers differently. The authors demonstrate that unselfish behaviour is in fact an important feature of both biological and human nature. Their book provides a panoramic view of altruism throughout the animal kingdom - from self-sacrificing parasites to insects that subsume in the superorganism of a colony to the human capacity for selflessness - even as it explains the evolutionary sense of such behaviour. Explaining how altruistic behaviour can evolve by natural selection, this book gives credence to the idea of group selection that was originally proposed by Darwin but denounced as heretical in the 1960s. It takes an evolutionary approach in explaining the ultimate psychological motives behind unselfish human behaviour. Developing a theory of the proximate mechanisms that most likely evolved to motivate adaptive helping behaviour, the authors show how people and perhaps other species evolved the capacity to care for others as a goal in itself.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful
By A Customer
Format:Hardcover
For more than a generation now, students of evolutionary biology have been taught that natural selection is a process that works on individuals. Where there is a conflict between the good of the individual and the good of the community, the selfish almost always prevails. There are good theoretical reasons to believe this should be so. Most of the work that has been done in the last century to turn Darwin's theory into a quantitative science seems to point in that direction. Individual selection should be fast and efficient; group selection slow and unreliable. Yet the biological world that we see seems to fly in the face of this conclusion. So much of the adaptation we see in the natural world looks like it benefits the community or the species, often at the expense of the individual. So the pure individual selectionists (99% of evolutionary biologists today) have had to concoct a series of excuses, kluges, and workarounds. There are a multitude of reasons! that what looks like a group adaptation is really an individual adaptation. Most of our community has unthinkingly adopted the view that the "selfish gene" perspective holds a key to understanding the "illusion" of group selection. Wilson has been working for 20 years to reform this situation, and to restore common sense. If it looks like a group adaptation, it probably is a group adaptation. No surprise here - except to that 99% of the academic community who has been raised to think that "group selection" is a dirty word - something like "Lamarckism" or "Creationism". Wilson's book is just the kick in the pants that the 99% of us need. It is readable, yet meticulously documented. He traces the history of our prejudice against group selection, and exposes the faulty logic in those kluges and workarounds. Group selection really is necessary to explain what we observe in nature. Then, he goes on to offer us the th! eoretical foundation we need to make group selection plausi! ble. There are mechanisms overlooked by the quantitative theorists that make group selection a far more viable process than they give it credit for. If you're a lay person, you may think "of course - what's the big deal." But if you're an academic evolutionist educated in the last 30 years, you need this book; your thinking about altruism and fitness of communities will be changed forever. All this is in the first half of the book. The second half, presumably contributed by Sober, is much less focused and scientific, more apt to dwell on definitions and philosophical distinctions. The attempt to connect the sound conclusions of the book's first half to attitudes about human cultures is both more speculative and somehow less ambitious and important than the book's first half.
Was this review helpful to you?
10 of 18 people found the following review helpful
The Groupies' world 4 July 2004
By Stephen A. Haines HALL OF FAME TOP 500 REVIEWER
Format:Hardcover
Some American scientists will stretch to amazing extremes in their efforts to overcome Darwin. Gould, one of the worst in this regard, set a tone of erosion of natural selection with "punk eek" or "evolution by jerks." Sober and Wilson, less original than Gould, have attempted to resurrect a long-outdated thesis with this work. As they candidly admit in their Introduction, "group selection" as an evolutionary mechanism, was declared moribund over thirty years ago. However, the remainder of the book is an attempt to revive the corpse. In their view, "altruism", although poorly defined by the authors, shifts natural selection from Darwin's original premise, to group interaction leading to optimal survival. It's a feeble effort, self-refuted on nearly every page.

Sober and Wilson offer two major themes: "Evolutionary Altruism" and "Psychological Altruism". The first part nods to the critics of group selection with some deftly selected quotes made to appear as if surrendering to the notion after all. This is a creationist ploy unexpected in a book purporting to be a serious scientific presentation. The authors attempt to temper the old view of group selection with what they term "multilevel selection theory" which they claim offers "new insights". These insights remain vague or missing altogether. Relying on human-based premises makes it immediately suspect. Using our societal standards to explain the behaviour of insects is not insight - it's misapplication of biology.

The second part, by its very title, shifts the focus to humans alone. Psychology of the remainder of the animal kingdom has so far eluded study. The authors focus on the contrast between "hedonism" and "altruism." These would appear self-explanatory, but in the hands of the authors, you are left in great doubt about their intent. Biologically, they concede these are not absolutes. Hence, we are given thoughts on "desires", "thoughts" and "beliefs" which fail to assemble into anything coherent.

Altruism bothered Darwin. In a world of individual "fitness" within an environment, survival and reproduction seemed the sole driving forces. Although "survival" has taken on a wider definition than in Darwin's day, Sober and Wilson seem to have missed the news. They even go so far as to categorise Darwin as "the first group selectionist"! Although the authors confront the reader with ponderous chapter titles ["Motives As Proximate Mechanisms"], appearing to have deep insights, a moment's reflection would have demonstrated to the authors that their thesis is untenable. No matter how much it bothered Darwin himself, altruism isn't fundamental to evolution's process. Their repeated example, the brain worm, is a prime example instead of kin selection which gives the appearance of altruism [the brain worm sibling group sacrifices one of their number that the remainder can propagate. They are 75% genetically the same].

What is most disturbing about this book is using our species to assess all life. If altruism is an evolutionary issue, why do the authors frame their concept on the human condition? They reveal their secret toward the end of the book in discussing "morality". Sober and Wilson struggle to place "morality" as an issue standing apart from natural selection, yet disclose it lies at the foundation of their presentation. There are many good questions offered for thought in this book, but no valid conclusions to adhere to. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]

Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Funny how the 'selfish' gene has become a religion, whose followers cannot tolerate any questioning of its central dogma. Sober demonstrates mathematically in this book that, under certain conditions, the genes for unselfish behaviour - supposing they exist - will spread through a species if groups with more unselfish members expand at the expense of those that have fewer. Hardly earth shaking, yet the faithful have risen up to denounce this diabolical heresy. In any case, the conclusion does not apply to humans unless we suppose that human unselfishness is produced by genes rather than culture - a very big assumption. An excellent book, but the style is not very accessible.
Was this review helpful to you?

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback


Amazon.co.uk Privacy Statement Amazon.co.uk Delivery Information Amazon.co.uk Returns & Exchanges