Some American scientists will stretch to amazing extremes in their efforts to overcome Darwin. Gould, one of the worst in this regard, set a tone of erosion of natural selection with "punk eek" or "evolution by jerks." Sober and Wilson, less original than Gould, have attempted to resurrect a long-outdated thesis with this work. As they candidly admit in their Introduction, "group selection" as an evolutionary mechanism, was declared moribund over thirty years ago. However, the remainder of the book is an attempt to revive the corpse. In their view, "altruism", although poorly defined by the authors, shifts natural selection from Darwin's original premise, to group interaction leading to optimal survival. It's a feeble effort, self-refuted on nearly every page.
Sober and Wilson offer two major themes: "Evolutionary Altruism" and "Psychological Altruism". The first part nods to the critics of group selection with some deftly selected quotes made to appear as if surrendering to the notion after all. This is a creationist ploy unexpected in a book purporting to be a serious scientific presentation. The authors attempt to temper the old view of group selection with what they term "multilevel selection theory" which they claim offers "new insights". These insights remain vague or missing altogether. Relying on human-based premises makes it immediately suspect. Using our societal standards to explain the behaviour of insects is not insight - it's misapplication of biology.
The second part, by its very title, shifts the focus to humans alone. Psychology of the remainder of the animal kingdom has so far eluded study. The authors focus on the contrast between "hedonism" and "altruism." These would appear self-explanatory, but in the hands of the authors, you are left in great doubt about their intent. Biologically, they concede these are not absolutes. Hence, we are given thoughts on "desires", "thoughts" and "beliefs" which fail to assemble into anything coherent.
Altruism bothered Darwin. In a world of individual "fitness" within an environment, survival and reproduction seemed the sole driving forces. Although "survival" has taken on a wider definition than in Darwin's day, Sober and Wilson seem to have missed the news. They even go so far as to categorise Darwin as "the first group selectionist"! Although the authors confront the reader with ponderous chapter titles ["Motives As Proximate Mechanisms"], appearing to have deep insights, a moment's reflection would have demonstrated to the authors that their thesis is untenable. No matter how much it bothered Darwin himself, altruism isn't fundamental to evolution's process. Their repeated example, the brain worm, is a prime example instead of kin selection which gives the appearance of altruism [the brain worm sibling group sacrifices one of their number that the remainder can propagate. They are 75% genetically the same].
What is most disturbing about this book is using our species to assess all life. If altruism is an evolutionary issue, why do the authors frame their concept on the human condition? They reveal their secret toward the end of the book in discussing "morality". Sober and Wilson struggle to place "morality" as an issue standing apart from natural selection, yet disclose it lies at the foundation of their presentation. There are many good questions offered for thought in this book, but no valid conclusions to adhere to. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]