I can't forget the first time I saw an Ansel Adams photograph. It was the photograph of a boulder strewn field leading to Mt. Williamson in the Sierra Nevada and it stood, it seems to me, 10 feet tall, at the entrance to the Family of Man exhibition at New York's Museum of Modern Art. It's easy to understand why, even though some downplay Adams' art now, in the eyes of many, he was and is America's greatest landscape artist.
In 1963 he was commissioned to prepare a book commemorating the University of California's centennial which was published as "Fiat Lux: The University of California". Although only a small portion of the images captured were published, 1,761 pictures were presented to the University. "Unseen Ansel Adams: Photographs from the Fiat Lux Collection" presents a selection of 190 photographs from the collection.
The compositional eye of Adams is immediately apparent in the photographs, even when turned to topics that were not the essence of Adams' work. The serpentine trails of roads, whether at a massive freeway intersection or meandering through rice fields, are quite impressive. More surprising though are the portraits of faculty, staff and students that show why the master was able to earn the income from his commercial work that his landscape art didn't provide, at least in the early days of his career. My favorite photo is that of the Lick Observatory, with three domes arrayed in distance, sitting on a ridge, high above the clouds, with distant peaks. The observatory in the foreground is crisp with a full range of black and white while the mountains, in a narrow range of tones of gray, show the effect of aerial perspective.
But be warned. Not all of these images are drop-dead gorgeous. Adams carefully controlled his work and I suspect that is why there were many fewer images in the "Fiat Lux" book than here. That's not unusual; most serious photographers shoot many more images than they present to the world.
A second problem of the images is their range of light. Adams worked hard and long on some of his pictures, when he took them, when he developed them, and when he printed them, to extend the range of light from what the camera captures to what the human eye sees (and some might suggest, even beyond that.) He wanted the blackest blacks and the whitest whites and a full range of tonalities between. In this book, many of the blacks are blocked up and many of the whites are featureless. That may be due to the process of printing (the book indicates the images were digitally reproduced from film negatives) or, I would like to think, because Adams only slaved to capture the full range of light in those pictures he deemed worthy of revealing to the world.
Lovers of Adams may want to look at the original "Fiat Lux" book which is still available. Students of the master will certainly want to consider these images, even if only to see the high quality of what he did not consider worthy.