I have to say I disagree with the other review for this book by "the magpie". It does not have dialogue as described in their review so I'm not entirely sure whether they've read the same book? I have a degree in History and I have to say that Plaidy does stick to the facts in general. It is important to remember that this is a work of fiction, it does not claim to be 100% factually correct.
This is the first in the Tudor series by Jean Plaidy. Beginning with the birth of Prince Arthur, it chronicles the reign of Henry VII. Plaidy guides us through the events of his reign - marches on London, pretenders to the throne, births and deaths and the arrival of the Spanish Infanta - Katherine of Aragon. She even manages to add a little on the events over the border in Scotland. At over 400 pages long, she really does pack in the detail and manages to make you actually care about some of the characters, such as Elizabeth Woodville and even Perkin Warbeck - a pretender to the throne.
I think Plaidy does particularly well in describing the precarious nature of Henry's rule. She also manages to simply describe the complicated family relationships, as well as the dynastic marriages and European politics. It would be easy for an author to become bogged down in the facts but the narrative seems effortless. Katherine of Aragon emerges as a particularly endearing character by the end of this novel and continues into Plaidy's next Tudor novel, "Katherine, the Virgin Widow"
It makes for a good, easy read, no "bodice ripping" as far as I could tell. In fact there are about 3 references to sex but no seductions etc. It is subtly understated in comparison to more modern novels, but still well worth reading.