Of all the classic horror movie staples, Hammer had perhaps their least success with Jekyll and Hyde, and Terence Fisher's 1960 effort The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll is a case in point. An original but nonetheless misconcieved departure from the premise of Robert Louis Stevenson's classic novella, this film isn't all that familiar to many Hammer fans, as since its initial release (on which it flopped quite badly, particularly in the US) it has very rarely received TV screenings, and hasn't been widely distributed on VHS or DVD. It features Canadian actor Paul Massie as a bearded, socially paralysed Henry Jekyll whose experiments with his dual nature unleash his alter-ego in the form of a handsome, smooth-talking, sociopathic Edward Hyde; there's actually as much of Stevenson's plot here as there was of Mary Shelley's and Bram Stoker's in Hammer's first Frankenstein and Dracula movies (1957, 1958), which also attempted to pare down the scope and scale of their sprawling source material via very economical screenplays. However, here Dr. Jekyll himself is the one and only character who survives the translation to film, which, like all movie versions of this story, forsakes the mystery set-up of the original book in favour of putting the Jekyll / Hyde character(s) centre stage from the start.
Massie is a serviceable lead, but it seems odd that the title role wasn't given to Christopher Lee, who had recently played the Frankenstein Creature, Count Dracula, and the Mummy for Fisher, and seemed ideally positioned to continue his run of great movie monsters. By now cheesed off that Hammer had denied him the leading parts in both The Hound of the Baskervilles and The Man Who Could Cheat Death (both 1959), he was similarly unimpressed to be offered a mere supporting role here too; however, as Paul Allen, Jekyll's libertine of a friend who falls victim to the murderous Hyde, Lee gives one of his most enjoyable performances anyway, acting Massie off the screen. Dawn Addams is also very good as Jekyll's wife, a far more conflicted and morally dubious character than was usually the case with Hammer's whiter-than-white heroines.
Fisher reportedly had little enthusiasm for this project (an attempt by producer Michael Carreras and screenwriter Wolf Mankowitz to elevate the status of Hammer's output with the critics), but you wouldn't know it from the finished film, which is one of the firm's most expensive-looking of the period, with great photography from Jack Asher, and some very effective editing. However, the movie is short on outright scares (there's nothing here to match the visual effects used to transform Fredric March's Jekyll in Rouben Mamoulian's definitive 1931 version), and for all its tinkering with Stevenson's original tale, Mankowitz's script doesn't really do the business (explanations of exactly what the scientist is trying to achieve are far more muddled here than in many other adaptations, and Hyde himself is finally revealed to be nothing more than a rapist with revenge on his mind). Even so, with Lee in the title role and the Paul Allen part handed over to, say, Oliver Reed (who turns up all too briefly as a nightclub pimp), this could have been a reasonable success, but as it stands, it's considerably weaker than Hammer's later (and even weirder) take on the tale, Dr. Jekyll and Sister Hyde (1971), which is today regarded as a minor fan favourite. As for Lee, he was to eventually have even less success with Jekyll and Hyde than Hammer did, as his only real shot at the part(s), Amicus' I, Monster (1970), was to emerge as another over-ambitious misfire.