Overall this is a fascinating and delightful look at cricket's leading spin bowlers, from the earliest spinners at Hambledon, through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, to Shane Warne, Muttiah Muralitharan and spinners in the Indian Premier League.
It is essentially a series of miniature case studies of each bowler, giving a flavour of his character and achievements, looking at his place in the development of spin bowling and analysing his technique - and is full of entertaining anecdotes. The technical analysis is perhaps the book's most distinctive quality and is clear and well done.
Two features of this technical analysis are particularly worth noting. The first is a series of diagrams showing how the various spinning deliveries - leg-break, googly, flipper, carrom ball, etc - are actually bowled. These are the best I've seen. The second is the author's research through early cricket literature and photography to identify examples of particular deliveries decades before they were generally thought to have been invented. This is fascinating and for the paperback edition it would be really handy if detailed page references could be added to help others examine the evidence.
I did wonder if the author really wanted to write a history of wrist spin and its associated mystery deliveries alone, rather than also cover finger spin. Leg spinners generally receive more extensive and insightful coverage than finger spinners - there are more pages on John Gleeson than Wilfred Rhodes, for example - and I would query why certain great finger spinners have been omitted altogether, perhaps most notably Colin Blythe.
My major reservation, though, is about the book's tone and its tendency to exaggerate its arguments. It really plays up the quirky and eccentric features of the great spinners with a "golly-gosh" flavour rarely far away. Spin bowlers are described as the "revolutionaries" of the game, which I would question. There are clearly revolutionary moments in the history of spin bowling but to brand spinners generally as revolutionaries seems wrong. And to dismiss all medium and fast bowling as having "all the romance of genital warts" is plain perverse.
These faults are particularly evident in chapter two "The Spinner's Spirit", where the author tries to draw more general conclusions about the nature of spin bowling. I suggest you buy the book and see what you think about these conclusions yourself, but I found them the least satisfactory aspect of the book. Too often a couple of examples are considered sufficient to "prove" a point when there is clearly much evidence to the contrary. To take just one example, in pursuit of the argument that spinners have a tendency to be "intellectuals" more than any other category of cricketer, it is put forward that Phil Edmonds "took a First from Cambridge". Maybe so, but then so did Mike Brearley, Peter Roebuck and Ed Smith...
Nevertheless, this is an enjoyable and thought-provoking book that is definitely worth reading. Recommended.