Frequently Bought Together
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Product details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Reviews
From Amazon.co.uk
Alfred Hitchcock hadn't made a spy thriller since the 1930s, so his 1969 adaptation of Leon Uris's bestseller Topaz seemed like a curious choice for the director. But Hitchcock makes Uris's story of the West's investigation into the Soviet Union's dealings with Cuba his own. Frederick Stafford plays a French intelligence agent who works with his American counterpart (John Forsythe) to break up a Soviet spy ring. The film is a bit flat dramatically and visually, and there are sequences that seem to occupy Hitchcock's attention more than others. A minor work all around, with at least two alternative endings shot by Hitchcock. --Tom Keogh
Product Description
Un alto funzionario del servizio segreto sovietico, consegnatosi agli americani, rivela loro che i russi stanno fornendo missili a Cuba: alcuni documenti, sottratti alla delegazione castrista all'Onu, confermano la notizia. La CIA affida il compito di andare sul posto per un controllo all'agente francese André Devereaux, ufficialmente consigliere d'ambasciata, che simpatizza per gli americani ed ha, a Cuba, una preziosa informatrice, Juanita de Cordoba, vedova di un eroe della rivoluzione, ma avversaria dell'illiberale regime che è subentrato. La donna gli procura le prove che i missili ci sono, ma viene scoperta e uccisa mentre André riesce a tornare a New York e ad informare la CIA: una conseguenza della sua missione sarà il ritiro dei missili sovietici da Cuba. Intanto, un agente americano suo amico, rivela a André che tra gli alti funzionari francesi, a Parigi, c'è un gruppo di traditori, al quale è stato dato il nome di "Topaz", che passa ai sovietici informazioni militari ed è diretto da un misterioso individuo ,Colombine, ed ha sicuramente tra i suoi membri l'economista Henri Jarre, a conoscenza di molti documenti segreti della NATO. Recatosi a Parigi, André incarica il genero François, giornalista, di recarsi in casa di Jarre, per indurlo, con accorte domande, a tradirsi. Durante il colloquio, intervengono agenti sovietici e Henri viene ucciso. Riuscito a fuggire, François dà ad André un'informazione preziosa: un numero telefonico, trovato in casa di Jarre...
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
15 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
For resons best known to themselves, Universal UK have issued most of Alfred Hitchcock's 1960s/1970s films (The Birds, Marnie, Torn Curtain, Topaz, Frenzy) in pan-and-scan 1.33:1 ratio, although these films were originally shown in widescreen (1.85:1).
This is available via Region 1 imported discs - if your DVD player is multi-region - but surely the UK deserves a better service than this!
Come on, Universal UK - give us the same remastered widescreen versions that are available for the US market!!!
This is available via Region 1 imported discs - if your DVD player is multi-region - but surely the UK deserves a better service than this!
Come on, Universal UK - give us the same remastered widescreen versions that are available for the US market!!!
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
Topaz is widely regarded as one of Hitchcock's worst films, but while certainly problematic there's still a lot to admire in this spy thriller set against the Cuban missile crisis. Unfortunately, rather than the original theatrical version (to date only released on laserdisc in the 90s), the version on video and this DVD is of a longer preview version before the film was trimmed down to size. For the most part the `additions' are fairly minor - the Russian defector being coerced to give information, a party scene, possibly a longer version of a scene between Frederick Stafford and Dany Robin - although the only one that makes a real difference is the addition of the best of the three alternate endings (of one character wryly waving goodbye at the airport having got away with it). Unfortunately, aside from drawing matters out even more, it still has the same structural problems as before: the plot is all over the place, and the film is really over once it leaves Cuba, seeming to spend an inordinate amount of time tying up loose ends although in reality introducing a new plot that should have been there from the very beginning. And there's a lot of Hitchcock's technical laziness - Frederick Stafford doesn't convince in his last, poorly staged scenes, and Hitchcock doesn't help him, while the photograph on his desk is shoddy enough to be a kindergarten cut-and-paste for show-and-tell. Yet it's still an intriguing film despite its flaws, with a few strikingly memorable scenes, especially those played without dialogue - watching the New York hotel from the florist's shop, the dead woman's dress unfolding like the petals of a flower as she falls to the ground, the grim almost-silent tableaux where a torture victim whispers a name.... Read more ›
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
By IWFIcon
VINE™ VOICE
Format:DVD
...then this film would be largely forgotten today. As it is it would probably rank as one of the "least known" films of Hitchcock's cannon (certainly in terms of his "talkies") and whilst it does have a few moments that are of interest you would have to say it deserves it's status as a forgotten film.
It was a movie that Hitchcock was enthusiastic about in the first instance but Leon Uris' attempt to turn his own novel into a screenplay did not meet with Hitch's expectations and it's therefore very tempting to include Topaz in the list of films that Hitch lost interest in before ever really getting off the ground with it. It also has a place in another Hitchcock "list", that of the films which were not (or couldn't be) allowed to finish in a manner which pleased him. That said, the fact that the original ending was derided by test audiences and the studio insisted that the spy couldn't end the film unpunished, is perhaps the least of this film's worries.
Becuase at heart, it's simply a very dull film. We care little (if at all) about any of the characters mainly because most of them are so inherently unlikeable. And whilst it is possible that the plot line of spies and political crises between countries might have been topical at the time it all seems so dated now, not a criticism you can normally throw at a Hitchcock film.
As ever it's Hitchcock so it's not completely a wash-out, but the great death scene of Juanita (the delectable Karin Dor) and the moment when Rico Parra (John Vernon) hears something from a woman holding her dying husband in her arms (which features great use of sound and near-silence) are the only two to spring to mind and that's not nearly enough to save what it, all things told, a complete dog of a film.... Read more ›
It was a movie that Hitchcock was enthusiastic about in the first instance but Leon Uris' attempt to turn his own novel into a screenplay did not meet with Hitch's expectations and it's therefore very tempting to include Topaz in the list of films that Hitch lost interest in before ever really getting off the ground with it. It also has a place in another Hitchcock "list", that of the films which were not (or couldn't be) allowed to finish in a manner which pleased him. That said, the fact that the original ending was derided by test audiences and the studio insisted that the spy couldn't end the film unpunished, is perhaps the least of this film's worries.
Becuase at heart, it's simply a very dull film. We care little (if at all) about any of the characters mainly because most of them are so inherently unlikeable. And whilst it is possible that the plot line of spies and political crises between countries might have been topical at the time it all seems so dated now, not a criticism you can normally throw at a Hitchcock film.
As ever it's Hitchcock so it's not completely a wash-out, but the great death scene of Juanita (the delectable Karin Dor) and the moment when Rico Parra (John Vernon) hears something from a woman holding her dying husband in her arms (which features great use of sound and near-silence) are the only two to spring to mind and that's not nearly enough to save what it, all things told, a complete dog of a film.... Read more ›
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
Hitchcock himself loathed this and wanted to make a movie about a serial killer in 60's New York called Kaliedoscope. Just think of how that would have turned out? Instead the studio forced Hitch into this political movie, with dire results.
This coming from a fan of Hitchcock who has almost all of his films.
True there are some wonderful scenes here, the telephone exchange, the death of the woman late on in the movie and the first twenty or so mins are quite a treat.
Try as I might to like this film, I simply cannot and I have asked myself that if this was not a Hitchcock movie would it really be remembered today? I think not. The master has made at least 30 brilliant movies, this is simply not one of them. The movie gets two stars largely due to Hitch's direction.
This coming from a fan of Hitchcock who has almost all of his films.
True there are some wonderful scenes here, the telephone exchange, the death of the woman late on in the movie and the first twenty or so mins are quite a treat.
Try as I might to like this film, I simply cannot and I have asked myself that if this was not a Hitchcock movie would it really be remembered today? I think not. The master has made at least 30 brilliant movies, this is simply not one of them. The movie gets two stars largely due to Hitch's direction.
By garden roses
Format:DVD|Amazon Verified Purchase
Have bought to add to my collection of Hitchcock Classics, Saving for when I can settle down on my own to enjoy without interruptions.
9 of 13 people found the following review helpful
By L. Davidson
VINE™ VOICE
Format:DVD
It is hard to believe that Alfred Hitchcock was involved in "Topaz". It is most unlike the rest of his work. "Topaz" is nothing more than a run of the mill, dull and cliched spy thriller. The acting is wooden,the dialogue and characterisation uninspired and the film is bereft of any action and build up of suspense. The storyline itself sounds quite promising ; the Cuban Missile Crisis, Soviet spy rings in French intelligence, defectors, suicides and illicit love affairs all feature and there are a variety of glamourous locations used for the film such as Copenhagen ,Washington ,New York ,Cuba and Paris. However "Topaz" remains curiously flat and prosaic throughout its excessively long running time of two and a half hours. Perhaps this is to do with the absence of a charismatic actor ,like James Stewart or Cary Grant, playing the key role of Devereux, or maybe Hitchcock's heart just wasn't in the film. "Topaz" certainly isn't up to his usual standards.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
›
Go to Amazon.com to see all 53 reviews
3.5 out of 5 stars
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
2.0 out of 5 stars
Hitch Does 007 (Badly)
This 1969 effort by one of cinema's greatest film-makers is really something of an embarrassment for Leytonstone's finest. Read more
Published 4 months ago by Keith M
2.0 out of 5 stars
very average
Topaz (1969) Adapting from his own bestseller, Leon Uris wrote the original screenplay for this cold war spy story. Read more
Published 15 months ago by Profr R. Cohenalmagor
4.0 out of 5 stars
Serious Hitchcock.
This is a really good thinky-hitchcock film - no birds, no killers, but engaging and complex.
Doesn't deserve bad press, it's visually stunning and massively plot... Read more
Doesn't deserve bad press, it's visually stunning and massively plot... Read more
Published on 23 May 2011 by lomesa
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very good spy film ...
It may not be among Hitchcock's best films, but taken as a stand alone piece of work this is a very good spy film. Read more
Published on 13 April 2011 by Mr. D. Pyke
4.0 out of 5 stars
Splendid combination of genuine spy-suspense and the cuban revolution
Although this film is not one of the best considered of A.Hitchcock, it is clearly one that could be defined as one of the best, in those days, handling the cold-war spy-games. Read more
Published on 15 Feb 2011 by manolo menendez
4.0 out of 5 stars
Trapped by the Iron Curtain
After the cold war in East Germany in "Torn Curtain", Hitchcock had to deal with the big bad wolf, the USSR. Read more
Published on 6 Feb 2009 by Jacques COULARDEAU
2.0 out of 5 stars
No, this will not do!
This film proves that I am right! When I see the other reviews I see the disappointments upon seeing this film. Even with its 3 alternate endings! Read more
Published on 18 July 2008 by Ogun Eratalay
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
