This book is clearly aimed at the fairly advanced freerider/boarder. The descriptions of the pisted areas are very high level (ie they are generally of a similar length to the descripion of the "Park") and similarly the ski school recommendations are all focused on guiding rather than, for example, the best company to take a timid intermdiate up to the next level. In short if you are not a strong freerider there are much more helpful books. However, if you are then why would you need this book anyway? You will probably have been skiing countless times, been to many of the best resorts and had extensive first hand reports of most of the others.
For me interest was limited to looking at some of the photos (there are some excellent action shots) and seeing where I agreed or disagreed with the rankings. Aside from this it is entirely pointless.
I have two other significant gripes:
- the reproduction of one or two of the lift maps was abysmal. Either blurred (eg Cortina) or strangely truncated (St Anton); and
- given the focus of the book, the inclusion of one or two or the resorts in bizarre in the extreme. I have skied in Andorra and although it has much to commend it in terms of cost, given the focus of the book, unless this is the main criteria, there are many excluded resorts in the Alps which have a much stronger claim to be in the top 50. Similarly the inclusion of Swedish and Norwegian resorts would seem to be driven purely by achieving geographic diversity (eg Oppdal only manages a rating higher than 2 out of 5 on the snow reliability criteria)