- Hardcover: 288 pages
- Publisher: Ian Allan Publishing; 1st ed edition (29 Oct 1998)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0711026335
- ISBN-13: 978-0711026339
- Product Dimensions: 23.1 x 15.2 x 3 cm
- Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (21 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 321,701 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
In this follow up to The Riddle of the Titan ic, Robin Gardiner goes further into the scandal of the sink ing not only with more evidence on the insurance scam, but a lso with more evidence proving the collusion of the British Government in the cover-up. '
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
the ship that never sank?,
By
This review is from: "Titanic": The Ship That Never Sank (Hardcover)
This book was recommended to me by the editor of a nautical magazine who said that it caused him to think! The thesis is certainly startling and the author has assembled an impressive list of facts to suggest that it was not the Titanic that went down but her sister ship. I do not have the knowledge or the expertise to determine the truth of this theory. All I can say is that it is a remarkably good read and whatever the truth of the matter one cannot but admire the diligence of the author for putting together so much information. Yes,it is a conspiracy theory but should not be dismissed without all the points made in the book being refuted by a reputable authority.
T Waite.
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting theory - short on evidence,
By A Customer
This review is from: "Titanic": The Ship That Never Sank (Hardcover)
An entertaining read. Gardiner's theory seems far fetched at first but he does give some very plausible motives and reasons for swapping the two ships. However historical conjecture is one thing, but when it comes to hard physical evidence, Gardiner really doesn't have any. He hints at several clues found on the wreck that support his theory, but fails to elaborate on them or even quote his sources. The theory tends to fall down due to the author's lack of detailed knowledge of the differences between the two ships - they differed in many more details than he lists. The whole process of switching identities is vastly underestimated by Gardiner. He makes it sound simple, but in reality it would have been an enormous task. Unlike many Titanic historians I approached this book with an open mind. The final verdict - a good read, but I don't buy Gardiner's theory.
17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Absurd conclusions reached by questionable methodology,
By A Customer
This review is from: "Titanic": The Ship That Never Sank (Hardcover)
I suppose I deserved this - I bought the first book, and should have known better. 'Once fooled, shame on you. Twice fooled, shame on me.' Gardiner explains away all the huge gaps in his theory with the catch-all caveat that it's a developing theory, therefore holes are acceptible. I imagine that's why he exonerated Captain Lord from any responsibility in the first book, but has him 'in' on the conspiracy in the second. He makes some laughable gaffs - I particularly enjoyed his conclusion that Sixth Officer James Paul Moody was an 'Olympic Class Sprinter' due to reports that he was on both the port and starboard sides of the boatdeck at the same time. This was based on the now thoroughly discredited lifeboat launch times from the British Inquiry. If he had used the revised timeline, he would have seen that Moody's reported actions make perfect sense as he progressed from port to starboard. Less amusing was his effort at character assasination with Harold Lowe - based entirely on the accounts of Minahan and Collyer, at least one of whom is dubious in the extreme. He completely ignores the many glowing accounts of Lowe's character and actions in favour of cheap and glib revisionism. Attempting to learn about the Titanic from this drivel is the equivalent of trying to understand the complexities of the JFK assasination by watching Oliver Stone's movie, or learning about the American Civil War by watching the movie 'Belle Starr' Follow the advice of Brian Ticehurst of the British Titanic Society....
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews |
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
