I am a fan of Tintin but not a fanatic, yet now Hergés' cult status is gaining ever more momentum following the movie The Secret Of The Unicorn. The high priest of the cult is Michael Farr. His book - "Tintin: The Complete Companion" - is well illustrated and written, full of facts and conveys lots of enthusiasm. But he has such an adolescent crush on Hergé that goes beyond common sense when he scribbles " Tintin's voyage to the moon was prophetically accurate." (Page 165). Hergé is now being short listed as one of the great science fiction innovators, Arthur C Clarke with crayons.
Fun as they are, the two moon books are preposterously wrong. I'd like to know what exactly Hergé got right.
1) Hergé was anti American and anti capitalist yet it was the United States who put a man on the moon in full view of the world. Hergé located his stories in an East European state with an abundance of nasty secret police determined to hide the whole project.
2) Hergé failed to appreciate a moon landing would involve hundreds of thousands of people. Putting it all together was one of mans' most inspiring achievements. In Hergés's world professor Calculus invents a "secret" nuclear rocket motor BUT he is the only one that knows how it works!
3) Staggeringly inaccurate in the Hergé stories there were no cameras on the moon - to record and transmit to the earth. It was a secret - while the reality was the world stood sill in awe when Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon.
4) The Hergé rocket is devoid of any basic science. Both nuclear and conventionally powered the weight of motors, the radioactive shielding required, makes the whole concept ludicrous even in 1953. Rather than seeing the future he looked backwards to a Nazi V2. Perhaps nostalgia, Hergé was a punished for his wartime collaboration with the Germans.
5) Hergé clearly had not the faintest idea of the huge power required to lift a small amount of weight into orbit. This is basic schoolboy and slide rule science which he failed to grasp.
6) The Hergé rocket is spacious, control cabin; bedroom, dining room and kitchen. His vehicle is more an overcrowded bus than a space vehicle.
7) Hergé completely failed to predict that to get into orbit with an adequate payload a rocket would be in several stages as was the three stage moon landing vehicle. This was well appreciated when Hergé was colouring his cartoon books.
8) To get a moon rocket to work, to train the crew, a huge build up of testing and training was required. The Hergé crew are indeed motley bunch but is a cartoon. He did get right that dogs went into space, one of his few achievements.
9) The space suits - which Hergé gets particular plaudits for - are woefully inadequate. The gold fish bowl helmets would have offered no protection and the solar heat would have roasted their skulls.
10) My personal best failure of Hergés' ""prophetic"" mind was where did his lunar vehicle come from? A facsimile of a military tank (British Centurion at + 50 tons) even on the books' cover it is clearly far too large for the rocket! It was battery powered and had a self contained life support system. Yes - compare this to the actual lunar rover.
The myth remains that Hergé was ahead of his time and in the two moon books went to enormous lengths to get the details correct. The books actually show his limitations as a story teller (sinister rather than inspiring) and technically he was just lazy in failing to do some elementary science research. He does not deserve the adulation he has acquired. There is a lot of depression (Hergé had mental health issues) and repression in his stories (how many of his plots involve heroin and cocaine). If you want to go to the moon, enjoy great writing by intelligent men then try Jules Verne (1865) or H G Wells (1901).